Bacitracin for Injection Recall: Impact on Immediate Breast Implant Surgical Outcomes

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.1155/2022/1389539
Abigail R. Tirrell, Jenna C. Bekeny, Eshetu A. Tefera, David H. Song, Kenneth L. Fan
{"title":"Bacitracin for Injection Recall: Impact on Immediate Breast Implant Surgical Outcomes","authors":"Abigail R. Tirrell,&nbsp;Jenna C. Bekeny,&nbsp;Eshetu A. Tefera,&nbsp;David H. Song,&nbsp;Kenneth L. Fan","doi":"10.1155/2022/1389539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Triple-antibiotic irrigation of breast implant pockets is a mainstay of infection prophylaxis in breast reconstruction and augmentation. The recall of bacitracin for injection due to risk of anaphylaxis and nephrotoxicity in January 2020, a staple component of the irrigation solution, has raised concern for worsened postoperative sequelae. This study aimed to investigate pre- and post-recall implant-based breast surgery to analyze the impact of bacitracin in irrigation solutions on infection rates. <i>Methods</i>. All implant-based breast reconstruction or augmentation surgeries from January 2019 to February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. In a regression discontinuity study design, patients were divided into pre- and post-recall groups. Patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes including infection rates were collected. Differences in complication rates were compared between groups and with surgical and patient factors. <i>Results</i>. 254 implants in 143 patients met inclusion criteria for this study, with 172 implants placed before recall and 82 placed after recall. Patients in each cohort did not differ in age, BMI, smoking status, or history of breast radiation or capsular contracture (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). All breast pockets were irrigated with antibiotic solution, most commonly bacitracin, cefazolin, gentamycin, and povidone-iodine before recall (116,67.4%) and cefazolin, gentamycin, and povidone-iodine after recall (59,72.0%). There was no difference in incidence of infection (6.4% vs. 8.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.551) or cellulitis (3.5% vs. 3.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.959) before and after recall. Implant infection was associated with smoking history (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and increased surgical time (<i>p</i> = 0.003). <i>Conclusions</i>. Despite the recent recall of bacitracin from inclusion in breast pocket irrigation solutions, our study demonstrated no detrimental impact on immediate complication rates. This shift in irrigation protocols calls for additional investigations into optimizing antibiotic combinations in solution, as bacitracin is no longer a viable option, to improve surgical outcomes and long-term benefits.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/1389539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Triple-antibiotic irrigation of breast implant pockets is a mainstay of infection prophylaxis in breast reconstruction and augmentation. The recall of bacitracin for injection due to risk of anaphylaxis and nephrotoxicity in January 2020, a staple component of the irrigation solution, has raised concern for worsened postoperative sequelae. This study aimed to investigate pre- and post-recall implant-based breast surgery to analyze the impact of bacitracin in irrigation solutions on infection rates. Methods. All implant-based breast reconstruction or augmentation surgeries from January 2019 to February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. In a regression discontinuity study design, patients were divided into pre- and post-recall groups. Patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes including infection rates were collected. Differences in complication rates were compared between groups and with surgical and patient factors. Results. 254 implants in 143 patients met inclusion criteria for this study, with 172 implants placed before recall and 82 placed after recall. Patients in each cohort did not differ in age, BMI, smoking status, or history of breast radiation or capsular contracture (p > 0.05). All breast pockets were irrigated with antibiotic solution, most commonly bacitracin, cefazolin, gentamycin, and povidone-iodine before recall (116,67.4%) and cefazolin, gentamycin, and povidone-iodine after recall (59,72.0%). There was no difference in incidence of infection (6.4% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.551) or cellulitis (3.5% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.959) before and after recall. Implant infection was associated with smoking history (p < 0.001) and increased surgical time (p = 0.003). Conclusions. Despite the recent recall of bacitracin from inclusion in breast pocket irrigation solutions, our study demonstrated no detrimental impact on immediate complication rates. This shift in irrigation protocols calls for additional investigations into optimizing antibiotic combinations in solution, as bacitracin is no longer a viable option, to improve surgical outcomes and long-term benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注射用杆菌肽召回:对即刻乳房植入手术结果的影响。
背景:乳房植入物口袋的三抗生素冲洗是乳房重建和隆胸感染预防的主要手段。由于过敏反应和肾毒性风险,注射用杆菌肽于2020年1月被召回,这引起了人们对术后后遗症恶化的担忧。杆菌肽是灌洗液的主要成分。本研究旨在调查假体乳房手术前后,分析冲洗液中杆菌肽对感染率的影响。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年2月期间所有基于假体的乳房重建或隆胸手术。在非连续性回归研究设计中,患者被分为回忆前组和回忆后组。收集患者人口统计资料、手术细节和包括感染率在内的结果。比较两组间并发症发生率的差异以及手术和患者因素。结果:143例患者中254例种植体符合本研究的纳入标准,其中172例在召回前放置,82例在召回后放置。每个队列的患者在年龄、BMI、吸烟状况、乳房放射史或乳房包膜挛缩史上没有差异(p > 0.05)。所有乳袋均用抗生素溶液冲洗,召回前以杆菌肽、头孢唑林、庆大霉素和聚维酮碘冲洗最多(116例,67.4%),召回后以头孢唑林、庆大霉素和聚维酮碘冲洗最多(59例,72.0%)。召回前后感染发生率(6.4%比8.5%,p=0.551)和蜂窝织炎发生率(3.5%比3.7%,p=0.959)无差异。种植体感染与吸烟史(p < 0.001)和手术时间增加有关(p=0.003)。结论:尽管最近因乳袋冲洗液中含有杆菌肽而被召回,但我们的研究表明对即时并发症发生率没有不利影响。由于杆菌肽不再是一种可行的选择,这种灌溉方案的转变要求对优化溶液中的抗生素组合进行额外的研究,以改善手术结果和长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
The Risk of Haematoma and Venous Thrombosis Associated With Thromboprophylaxis Use in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review The Relationship Between Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of 22 Cases of Tubular Breast Carcinoma Switching to Tumescent Dissection in Mastectomy Management of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Effectiveness of a Steroid-Free Regimen Using Tinospora cordifolia—A Single-Institution Experience Intralesional Steroid Injections for Management of Granulomatous Mastitis: A Systematic Review of Treatment Protocols and Clinical Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1