Development of a Planning for Aging and Frailty Questionnaire.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Research in Gerontological Nursing Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.3928/19404921-20220830-02
Erica Frechman, Harleah G Buck, Mary S Dietrich, Cathy A Maxwell
{"title":"Development of a Planning for Aging and Frailty Questionnaire.","authors":"Erica Frechman,&nbsp;Harleah G Buck,&nbsp;Mary S Dietrich,&nbsp;Cathy A Maxwell","doi":"10.3928/19404921-20220830-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a gap in understanding adults' readiness to plan for adaptions across the aging trajectory. The purpose of the current psychometric project was to develop and test the Planning for Aging and Frailty Questionnaire. Clinical experience and extant literature formed the basis for creating items measuring planning for aging. Content validity was established with gerontology and health service research experts. Face validity testing was conducted through two cognitive interviewing and debriefing sessions at a senior center. All survey questions resulted in a content validity index ≥0.80 from experts. Face validity testing involved successful completion of the survey by 12 adults followed by cognitive interviewing/debriefing, resulting in minor changes. The 21-item Planning for Aging and Frailty Questionnaire demonstrates good initial validity and can be used to measure readiness in planning for aging and personal experiences and experiences with others. Further testing with additional usage is warranted. [<i>Research in Gerontological Nursing, 15</i>(5), 239-244.].</p>","PeriodicalId":51272,"journal":{"name":"Research in Gerontological Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Gerontological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20220830-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a gap in understanding adults' readiness to plan for adaptions across the aging trajectory. The purpose of the current psychometric project was to develop and test the Planning for Aging and Frailty Questionnaire. Clinical experience and extant literature formed the basis for creating items measuring planning for aging. Content validity was established with gerontology and health service research experts. Face validity testing was conducted through two cognitive interviewing and debriefing sessions at a senior center. All survey questions resulted in a content validity index ≥0.80 from experts. Face validity testing involved successful completion of the survey by 12 adults followed by cognitive interviewing/debriefing, resulting in minor changes. The 21-item Planning for Aging and Frailty Questionnaire demonstrates good initial validity and can be used to measure readiness in planning for aging and personal experiences and experiences with others. Further testing with additional usage is warranted. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 15(5), 239-244.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“长者及体弱多病计划”问卷的编制。
在了解成年人是否准备好计划适应整个老龄化轨迹方面存在差距。目前的心理测量项目的目的是开发和测试老龄化和虚弱的计划问卷。临床经验和现存文献构成了编制老年计划测量项目的基础。内容效度由老年学和卫生服务研究专家共同建立。面部效度测试在老年中心通过两次认知访谈和述职会议进行。所有调查问题均得到专家的内容效度指数≥0.80。面部效度测试涉及12名成年人成功完成调查,随后进行认知访谈/汇报,导致轻微的变化。21项老龄化和衰弱计划问卷显示出良好的初始效度,可以用来衡量计划老龄化和个人经历以及与他人的经历的准备程度。进一步的测试和额外的使用是有保证的。老年护理研究,15(5),239-244。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Gerontological Nursing is a forum for disseminating peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, cutting-edge gerontological nursing research and theory to investigators, educators, academicians, clinicians, and policymakers involved with older adults in all health care settings. The Journal accepts manuscripts reporting research, theory, integrative and systematic reviews, instrument development, and research methods with the aims of improving the wellness and quality of care of the older adult population. Theory papers should advance gerontological knowledge, and integrative reviews should provide an analysis of the state of the science and provide direction for future research.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Risk Factors for Falls in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Erratum for "Factors Contributing to Well-Being in Japanese Community-Dwelling Older Adults Who Experienced Spousal Bereavement". Feasibility of a Culture-Based Multicomponent Cognitive Training Program for Older Adults With Dementia. Hospital at Home: An Example of Research Needed to Shape Policy. Mechanisms Underlying the Use of Abusive and Neglectful Behaviors in Dementia Caregiving: The Role of Caregiver Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1