Population Segmentation Using a Novel Socio-Demographic Dataset.

Online journal of public health informatics Pub Date : 2022-08-11 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5210/ojphi.v14i1.11651
Elisabeth L Scheufele, Brandi Hodor, George Popa, Suwei Wang, William J Kassler
{"title":"Population Segmentation Using a Novel Socio-Demographic Dataset.","authors":"Elisabeth L Scheufele, Brandi Hodor, George Popa, Suwei Wang, William J Kassler","doi":"10.5210/ojphi.v14i1.11651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Appending market segmentation data to a national healthcare knowledge, attitude and behavior survey and medical claims by geocode can provide valuable insight for providers, payers and public health entities to better understand populations at a hyperlocal level and develop cohort-specific strategies for health improvement. A prolonged use case investigates population factors, including social determinants of health, in depression and develops cohort-level management strategies, utilizing market segmentation and survey data. Survey response scores for each segment were normalized against the average national score and appended to claims data to identify at-risk segment whose scores were compared with three socio-demographically comparable but not at-risk segments via Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to identify specific risk factors for intervention. The marketing segment, New Melting Point (NMP), was identified as at-risk. The median scores of three comparable segments differed from NMP in \"Inability to Pay For Basic Needs\" (121% vs 123%), \"Lack of Transportation\" (112% vs 153%), \"Utilities Threatened\" (103% vs 239%), \"Delay Visiting MD\" (67% vs 181%), \"Delay/Not Fill Prescription\" (117% vs 182%), \"Depressed: All/Most Time\" (127% vs 150%), and \"Internet: Virtual Visit\" (55% vs 130%) (all with p<0.001). The appended dataset illustrates NMP as having many stressors (e.g., difficult social situations, delaying seeking medical care). Strategies to improve depression management in NMP could employ virtual visits, or pharmacy incentives. Insights gleaned from appending market segmentation and healthcare utilization survey data can fill in knowledge gaps from claims-based data and provide practical and actionable insights for use by providers, payers and public health entities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":" ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473328/pdf/ojphi-14-1-e1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v14i1.11651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appending market segmentation data to a national healthcare knowledge, attitude and behavior survey and medical claims by geocode can provide valuable insight for providers, payers and public health entities to better understand populations at a hyperlocal level and develop cohort-specific strategies for health improvement. A prolonged use case investigates population factors, including social determinants of health, in depression and develops cohort-level management strategies, utilizing market segmentation and survey data. Survey response scores for each segment were normalized against the average national score and appended to claims data to identify at-risk segment whose scores were compared with three socio-demographically comparable but not at-risk segments via Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to identify specific risk factors for intervention. The marketing segment, New Melting Point (NMP), was identified as at-risk. The median scores of three comparable segments differed from NMP in "Inability to Pay For Basic Needs" (121% vs 123%), "Lack of Transportation" (112% vs 153%), "Utilities Threatened" (103% vs 239%), "Delay Visiting MD" (67% vs 181%), "Delay/Not Fill Prescription" (117% vs 182%), "Depressed: All/Most Time" (127% vs 150%), and "Internet: Virtual Visit" (55% vs 130%) (all with p<0.001). The appended dataset illustrates NMP as having many stressors (e.g., difficult social situations, delaying seeking medical care). Strategies to improve depression management in NMP could employ virtual visits, or pharmacy incentives. Insights gleaned from appending market segmentation and healthcare utilization survey data can fill in knowledge gaps from claims-based data and provide practical and actionable insights for use by providers, payers and public health entities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用新颖的社会人口数据集进行人口划分。
将市场细分数据应用到全国医疗保健知识、态度和行为调查以及按地理编码分类的医疗索赔中,可为医疗服务提供者、支付者和公共卫生机构提供宝贵的洞察力,从而更好地了解超本地水平的人群,并制定针对特定人群的健康改善策略。一个长期用例调查了抑郁症的人群因素,包括健康的社会决定因素,并利用市场细分和调查数据制定了群组级管理策略。通过非参数曼-惠特尼 U 检验,将每个细分市场的调查回复分数与全国平均分数进行归一化处理,并将其添加到理赔数据中,以确定高风险细分市场,并将其分数与三个社会人口统计学上具有可比性但不属于高风险的细分市场进行比较,以确定需要干预的特定风险因素。新熔点 (NMP) 营销群体被确定为高风险群体。在 "无力支付基本需求"(121% vs 123%)、"缺乏交通"(112% vs 153%)、"水电供应受到威胁"(103% vs 239%)、"延迟就诊"(67% vs 181%)、"延迟/不配药"(117% vs 182%)、"情绪低落:全部/大部分时间"(127% 对 150%)和 "互联网:虚拟就诊"(55% 对 130%)(均为 p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Population Digital Health: Continuous Health Monitoring and Profiling at Scale. Rank Ordered Design Attributes for Health Care Dashboards Including Artificial Intelligence: Usability Study. Attitudes of Health Professionals Toward Digital Health Data Security in Northwest Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study. Contact Tracing Different Age Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Study From South-West Germany. Data Analytics to Support Policy Making for Noncommunicable Diseases: Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1