Anatomical bone structure differences in patients with hemophilic arthropathy of the knee.

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2022-08-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_59_2022
Mehmet Ekinci, Turgut Akgül, Ufuk Arzu, Serkan Bayram, Taha Furkan Yağcı, Önder Kılıçoğlu
{"title":"Anatomical bone structure differences in patients with hemophilic arthropathy of the knee.","authors":"Mehmet Ekinci,&nbsp;Turgut Akgül,&nbsp;Ufuk Arzu,&nbsp;Serkan Bayram,&nbsp;Taha Furkan Yağcı,&nbsp;Önder Kılıçoğlu","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_59_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The anatomical differences of the bony structure of the knee joint in patients with hemophilia were evaluated, and the results were compared with the knees of patients with primary gonarthrosis and no arthrosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study reviewed 41 knees in 21 patients (with an Arnold-Hilgartner classification of Stages 4 and 5 hemophilic arthropathy) who underwent total knee arthroplasty in single center. Two control groups including 21 asymptomatic patients (42 knees) and 21 primary knee osteoarthritis patients (42 knees) were formed to compare the measurements with hemophiliacs. Femoral mediolateral width, femoral anteroposterior width, femur and tibia diaphysis width, adductor tubercle-joint line distance, tibial plateau width, and medial and lateral tibia plateau width were measured separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Femoral mediolateral width was significantly narrow comparing with healthy individuals and primary knee osteoarthritis group. Tibial plateau was similar to asymptomatic group but significantly narrow compared with primary knee osteoarthritis group. With the correlation, the tibial plateau measurements and medial and lateral plateau were significantly narrow at hemophilic arthropathy group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The slope was less in hemophilic patients as compared with asymptomatic individuals (<i>P</i>: 0.001). Hemophilic patients had larger femoral aspect ratios than asymptomatic group but there were no observable differences with the primary osteoarthritis group. For the tibial aspect ratios, hemophilic had a smaller ratio than the primary osteoarthritis group but there were no significant differences with the asymptomatic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hemophilic knee has a mismatch between femoral and tibial side while comparing with the other groups.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, cross-sectional study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/a0/JCIS-12-46.PMC9479580.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_59_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The anatomical differences of the bony structure of the knee joint in patients with hemophilia were evaluated, and the results were compared with the knees of patients with primary gonarthrosis and no arthrosis.

Material and methods: This study reviewed 41 knees in 21 patients (with an Arnold-Hilgartner classification of Stages 4 and 5 hemophilic arthropathy) who underwent total knee arthroplasty in single center. Two control groups including 21 asymptomatic patients (42 knees) and 21 primary knee osteoarthritis patients (42 knees) were formed to compare the measurements with hemophiliacs. Femoral mediolateral width, femoral anteroposterior width, femur and tibia diaphysis width, adductor tubercle-joint line distance, tibial plateau width, and medial and lateral tibia plateau width were measured separately.

Results: Femoral mediolateral width was significantly narrow comparing with healthy individuals and primary knee osteoarthritis group. Tibial plateau was similar to asymptomatic group but significantly narrow compared with primary knee osteoarthritis group. With the correlation, the tibial plateau measurements and medial and lateral plateau were significantly narrow at hemophilic arthropathy group (P < 0.05). The slope was less in hemophilic patients as compared with asymptomatic individuals (P: 0.001). Hemophilic patients had larger femoral aspect ratios than asymptomatic group but there were no observable differences with the primary osteoarthritis group. For the tibial aspect ratios, hemophilic had a smaller ratio than the primary osteoarthritis group but there were no significant differences with the asymptomatic group.

Conclusion: Hemophilic knee has a mismatch between femoral and tibial side while comparing with the other groups.

Level of evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节血友病患者的解剖骨结构差异。
目的:评价血友病患者膝关节骨结构的解剖差异,并与原发性关节病和无关节病患者的膝关节进行比较。材料和方法:本研究回顾了21例接受单中心全膝关节置换术的患者的41个膝关节(Arnold-Hilgartner分期为4期和5期血友病)。将21例无症状患者(42个膝关节)和21例原发性膝关节骨性关节炎患者(42个膝关节)作为对照组,与血友病患者进行比较。分别测量股骨内外侧宽度、股骨前后宽度、股骨胫骨骨干宽度、内收肌结核-关节线距离、胫骨平台宽度、胫骨平台内侧和外侧宽度。结果:股骨内外侧宽度较健康人及原发性膝骨关节炎组明显变窄。胫骨平台与无症状组相似,但与原发性膝骨关节炎组相比明显缩小。血友病组胫骨平台测量值、内外侧平台测量值明显变窄(P < 0.05)。与无症状个体相比,血友病患者的斜率更小(P: 0.001)。血友病患者的股骨宽高比大于无症状组,但与原发性骨关节炎组无明显差异。对于胫骨宽高比,血友病组比原发性骨关节炎组小,但与无症状组无显著差异。结论:与其他组相比,血友病膝关节股骨侧与胫骨侧不匹配。证据等级:四级,横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
期刊最新文献
Granulomatous mastitis following stereotactic core-needle biopsy: A case report. Multimodal imaging findings of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: A case report. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of intracranial and extracranial meningioma with perineural spread through the foramen rotundum: A case report. Roadmap to success: Blueprint for enterprise-wide deployment of a point-of-care ultrasound platform, inclusive of governance, policy, education, credentialing, and quality assurance. Facet joint septic arthritis: A review of cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1