Cross-sectional survey of barriers and opportunities for engaging backyard poultry producers and veterinarians in addressing poultry health.

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES New Zealand veterinary journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1080/00480169.2022.2128461
S S Greening, M C Gates
{"title":"Cross-sectional survey of barriers and opportunities for engaging backyard poultry producers and veterinarians in addressing poultry health.","authors":"S S Greening,&nbsp;M C Gates","doi":"10.1080/00480169.2022.2128461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the current level of engagement between backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians in New Zealand; to understand the opportunities and barriers for improving access to poultry health care; and to gauge the interest of backyard poultry keepers in participating in a voluntary national poultry health information system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Backyard poultry were defined as any bird species kept for non-commercial purposes. Separate cross-sectional surveys were administered to backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians in New Zealand over 12-week periods starting 22 March 2021 and 03 May 2021 respectively. The veterinarian survey was advertised in the monthly update e-mail from the Veterinary Council of New Zealand, while the survey for backyard poultry keepers was advertised on various online platforms that focus on raising backyard poultry. Results for quantitative variables were reported as basic descriptive statistics, while qualitative free-text responses from open-ended questions were explored using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 backyard poultry keepers and 35 veterinarians completed the survey. Almost half (56/125; 44.8%) of backyard poultry keepers reported that they had never taken their birds to a veterinarian, with common reasons being difficulty finding a veterinarian, cost of treatment, and perceptions that most visits result in the bird being euthanised. The majority (113/125; 90.4%) of backyard poultry keepers reported that a general internet search was their primary source for poultry health advice. However, it remains unclear if owners were satisfied with the advice found online, as many cited that having access to reliable health information would be an incentive for registering with a poultry health information system. Of the veterinarian responses, 29/35 (82.9%) reported treating an increasing number of poultry in the last 5 years, although many (27/35; 77.1%) suggested they would be hesitant to increase their poultry caseload due to concerns over their lack of knowledge and confidence in poultry medicine; a lack of clinic resources to treat poultry; concerns over the cost-effectiveness of treatments; and a general feeling of helplessness when treating poultry, with most consultations being for end-stage disease and euthanasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study highlight opportunities for increased engagement between backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians, including making available accurate poultry health information and providing veterinarians with improved training in poultry medicine. The results also support the development of a poultry health information system in New Zealand to further enhance health and welfare in backyard poultry populations.<b>Abbreviations:</b> MPI: Ministry for Primary Industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19322,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand veterinary journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2022.2128461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: To assess the current level of engagement between backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians in New Zealand; to understand the opportunities and barriers for improving access to poultry health care; and to gauge the interest of backyard poultry keepers in participating in a voluntary national poultry health information system.

Materials and methods: Backyard poultry were defined as any bird species kept for non-commercial purposes. Separate cross-sectional surveys were administered to backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians in New Zealand over 12-week periods starting 22 March 2021 and 03 May 2021 respectively. The veterinarian survey was advertised in the monthly update e-mail from the Veterinary Council of New Zealand, while the survey for backyard poultry keepers was advertised on various online platforms that focus on raising backyard poultry. Results for quantitative variables were reported as basic descriptive statistics, while qualitative free-text responses from open-ended questions were explored using thematic analysis.

Results: A total of 125 backyard poultry keepers and 35 veterinarians completed the survey. Almost half (56/125; 44.8%) of backyard poultry keepers reported that they had never taken their birds to a veterinarian, with common reasons being difficulty finding a veterinarian, cost of treatment, and perceptions that most visits result in the bird being euthanised. The majority (113/125; 90.4%) of backyard poultry keepers reported that a general internet search was their primary source for poultry health advice. However, it remains unclear if owners were satisfied with the advice found online, as many cited that having access to reliable health information would be an incentive for registering with a poultry health information system. Of the veterinarian responses, 29/35 (82.9%) reported treating an increasing number of poultry in the last 5 years, although many (27/35; 77.1%) suggested they would be hesitant to increase their poultry caseload due to concerns over their lack of knowledge and confidence in poultry medicine; a lack of clinic resources to treat poultry; concerns over the cost-effectiveness of treatments; and a general feeling of helplessness when treating poultry, with most consultations being for end-stage disease and euthanasia.

Conclusion: The results of this study highlight opportunities for increased engagement between backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians, including making available accurate poultry health information and providing veterinarians with improved training in poultry medicine. The results also support the development of a poultry health information system in New Zealand to further enhance health and welfare in backyard poultry populations.Abbreviations: MPI: Ministry for Primary Industries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让后院家禽生产者和兽医参与解决家禽健康问题的障碍和机会的横断面调查。
目的:评估目前新西兰后院家禽饲养者和兽医之间的接触水平;了解改善获得家禽卫生保健的机会和障碍;并评估后院家禽饲养者参与自愿国家家禽健康信息系统的兴趣。材料和方法:后院家禽被定义为非商业目的饲养的任何鸟类。分别从2021年3月22日和2021年5月3日开始,在为期12周的时间内对新西兰的后院家禽饲养者和兽医进行了单独的横断面调查。兽医调查在新西兰兽医委员会每月更新的电子邮件中进行宣传,而对后院家禽饲养者的调查则在各种专注于饲养后院家禽的在线平台上进行宣传。定量变量的结果被报告为基本的描述性统计,而开放性问题的定性自由文本回答则使用主题分析进行探索。结果:共有125名散养家禽饲养者和35名兽医完成调查。几乎一半(56/125;44.8%)的后院家禽饲养者报告说,他们从未带他们的家禽去看兽医,常见的原因是很难找到兽医,治疗费用高,以及认为大多数访问导致鸟类被安乐死。多数(113/125;90.4%)的后院家禽饲养者报告说,一般的互联网搜索是他们获得家禽健康建议的主要来源。然而,目前尚不清楚饲主是否对网上找到的建议感到满意,因为许多人表示,获得可靠的健康信息将是在家禽健康信息系统注册的一个激励因素。在答复的兽医中,29/35(82.9%)报告在过去5年中治疗的家禽数量有所增加,尽管许多(27/35;77.1%)表示,由于担心缺乏对家禽医学的知识和信心,他们对增加家禽病例数量犹豫不决;缺乏治疗家禽的诊所资源;对治疗成本效益的关注;在治疗家禽时普遍感到无助,大多数咨询都是针对晚期疾病和安乐死。结论:本研究的结果强调了增加后院家禽饲养者和兽医之间接触的机会,包括提供准确的家禽健康信息和向兽医提供家禽医学方面的改进培训。研究结果还支持新西兰家禽卫生信息系统的发展,以进一步提高后院家禽种群的健康和福利。缩写:MPI:第一产业部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand veterinary journal
New Zealand veterinary journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Veterinary Journal (NZVJ) is an international journal publishing high quality peer-reviewed articles covering all aspects of veterinary science, including clinical practice, animal welfare and animal health. The NZVJ publishes original research findings, clinical communications (including novel case reports and case series), rapid communications, correspondence and review articles, originating from New Zealand and internationally. Topics should be relevant to, but not limited to, New Zealand veterinary and animal science communities, and include the disciplines of infectious disease, medicine, surgery and the health, management and welfare of production and companion animals, horses and New Zealand wildlife. All submissions are expected to meet the highest ethical and welfare standards, as detailed in the Journal’s instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
Repeatability of whole herd lameness scoring: an analysis of a New Zealand dataset. Theileria orientalis Ikeda infection detected in red deer but not dogs or horses in New Zealand. The effect of three different preservatives on the numbers and types of bacteria, Brix percentage, pH and nutritional composition of bovine colostrum sourced from New Zealand dairy farms. Biomechanical comparison of bone staple fixation methods with suture material for median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone models. Behavioural response to gastrointestinal parasites of yearling dairy calves at pasture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1