Estimation of cardiac QTc intervals in people prescribed antipsychotics: a comparison of correction factors.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2022-06-16 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253221104947
Teodora Andric, Karl Winckel, Timothy David Tanzer, Samantha Hollingworth, Lesley Smith, Katherine Isoardi, Olivier Tan, Dan Siskind
{"title":"Estimation of cardiac QTc intervals in people prescribed antipsychotics: a comparison of correction factors.","authors":"Teodora Andric,&nbsp;Karl Winckel,&nbsp;Timothy David Tanzer,&nbsp;Samantha Hollingworth,&nbsp;Lesley Smith,&nbsp;Katherine Isoardi,&nbsp;Olivier Tan,&nbsp;Dan Siskind","doi":"10.1177/20451253221104947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) QT interval is associated with cardiac events and increased mortality. Antipsychotics can prolong the QT interval. The QT interval requires correction (QTc) for heart rate using a formula or QT-nomogram. The QT and QTc can be calculated automatically by the ECG machine or manually; however, machine-measured QT(c) intervals may be inaccurate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the mean QTc and proportion of prolonged QTc intervals in people taking antipsychotic medicines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational retrospective chart review and data analysis of all consecutive patients taking antipsychotics, with an ECG record, admitted to the psychiatric unit of a large tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, between 1 January 2017 and 30 January 2019. We investigated the mean QTc of people taking antipsychotics to determine differences using (a) machine <i>versus</i> manual QT interval measurement and (b) QTc correction formulae (Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges and Rautaharju) and the QT-nomogram. We also determined the number of people with a prolonged QTc using different methods and compared rates of prolonged QTc with antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 920 included people, the mean (±SD) machine-measured, Bazett-corrected QT interval (recorded from the ECG) was 435 ms (±27), significantly longer (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than the mean manually measured corrected QT intervals with Fridericia 394 ms (±24), Framingham 395 ms (±22), Hodges 398 ms (±22) and Rautaharju 400 ms (±24) formulae. There were significantly more people with a prolonged QTc using machine-measured QT and the Bazett formula (12.0%, 110/920) when compared with manually measured QT and the Fridericia formula (2.2%, 20/920) or QT-nomogram (0.7%, 6/920). Rates of QTc prolongation did not differ between people taking antipsychotic polypharmacy compared with monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine-measured QTc using the Bazett formula overestimates the QTc interval length and number of people with a prolonged QTc, compared with other formulae and the QT-nomogram. We recommend manually measuring the QT and correcting with the Fridericia formula or QT-nomogram prior to modifying antipsychotic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/bb/10.1177_20451253221104947.PMC9210090.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253221104947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) QT interval is associated with cardiac events and increased mortality. Antipsychotics can prolong the QT interval. The QT interval requires correction (QTc) for heart rate using a formula or QT-nomogram. The QT and QTc can be calculated automatically by the ECG machine or manually; however, machine-measured QT(c) intervals may be inaccurate.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the mean QTc and proportion of prolonged QTc intervals in people taking antipsychotic medicines.

Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective chart review and data analysis of all consecutive patients taking antipsychotics, with an ECG record, admitted to the psychiatric unit of a large tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, between 1 January 2017 and 30 January 2019. We investigated the mean QTc of people taking antipsychotics to determine differences using (a) machine versus manual QT interval measurement and (b) QTc correction formulae (Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges and Rautaharju) and the QT-nomogram. We also determined the number of people with a prolonged QTc using different methods and compared rates of prolonged QTc with antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy.

Results: Of 920 included people, the mean (±SD) machine-measured, Bazett-corrected QT interval (recorded from the ECG) was 435 ms (±27), significantly longer (p < 0.001) than the mean manually measured corrected QT intervals with Fridericia 394 ms (±24), Framingham 395 ms (±22), Hodges 398 ms (±22) and Rautaharju 400 ms (±24) formulae. There were significantly more people with a prolonged QTc using machine-measured QT and the Bazett formula (12.0%, 110/920) when compared with manually measured QT and the Fridericia formula (2.2%, 20/920) or QT-nomogram (0.7%, 6/920). Rates of QTc prolongation did not differ between people taking antipsychotic polypharmacy compared with monotherapy.

Conclusion: Machine-measured QTc using the Bazett formula overestimates the QTc interval length and number of people with a prolonged QTc, compared with other formulae and the QT-nomogram. We recommend manually measuring the QT and correcting with the Fridericia formula or QT-nomogram prior to modifying antipsychotic therapies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗精神病药物患者心脏QTc间期的估计:校正因子的比较。
背景:心电图(ECG) QT间期延长与心脏事件和死亡率增加有关。抗精神病药物可延长QT间期。QT间期需要使用公式或QT-nomogram来校正心率(QTc)。QT和QTc可由心电图机自动计算或人工计算;然而,机器测量的QT(c)间期可能不准确。目的:探讨服用抗精神病药物人群的平均QTc及QTc间隔延长比例。方法:我们对2017年1月1日至2019年1月30日在澳大利亚布里斯班一家大型三级医院精神科住院的所有连续服用抗精神病药物并有心电图记录的患者进行了观察性回顾性图表回顾和数据分析。我们调查了服用抗精神病药物的人的平均QTc,以确定使用(a)机器与手动QT间期测量和(b) QTc校正公式(Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges和Rautaharju)和QT nomogram的差异。我们还确定了使用不同方法延长QTc的人数,并比较了抗精神病药物单一治疗和多种药物治疗延长QTc的比率。结果:920名受试者中,机器测量的经Bazett校正的QT间期(心电图记录)的平均值(±SD)为435 ms(±27),显著延长(p)。结论:与其他公式和QT nomogram相比,使用Bazett公式的机器测量QTc高估了QTc间期长度和QTc延长的人数。我们建议在调整抗精神病药物治疗之前,手动测量QT并使用Fridericia公式或QT-nomogram进行校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Use of an injection of aripiprazole given once every 2 months (Abilify Asimtufii®) in people with bipolar I disorder: a Plain Language Summary of Publication. Exploring the clinical factors affecting lithium dose and plasma level and the effect of brand. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and its comparison with high-frequency stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Risperidone ISM®: review and update of its usefulness in all phases of schizophrenia. Incorporation of a specialist mental health clinical pharmacist within a primary care network: patient referrals, prescribing decisions, and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1