Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251396255
Charles Dodds, Rachelle Dawson, Alexander Lim, Susannah Tye, Fatima Nasrallah
Novel interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) leverage the psychoactive properties of psychedelic compounds, such as ketamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and psilocybin, which may overcome limitations of conventional treatments. Through the modulation of pathways involved in synaptic plasticity, psychedelic interventions are believed to enhance the mechanisms underlying memory processing and extinction. Multi-modal approaches to patient care can use existing treatments in combination with psychedelics to improve the efficacy of current psychotherapies, producing rapid and lasting improvement to chronic physiological and psychological symptoms. Modern methods for predicting treatment response will allow clinicians to personalise psychedelic interventions to the individual, capitalising on quantitative evidence to provide precision medical care. This review serves to identify limitations of the current treatment paradigm for PTSD, highlight how emerging psychedelic interventions may offer a solution to these considerations and explore the promise of precision medicine approaches for the future of PTSD treatment.
{"title":"Novel psychedelic interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and their promise for precision medicine.","authors":"Charles Dodds, Rachelle Dawson, Alexander Lim, Susannah Tye, Fatima Nasrallah","doi":"10.1177/20451253251396255","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251396255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) leverage the psychoactive properties of psychedelic compounds, such as ketamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and psilocybin, which may overcome limitations of conventional treatments. Through the modulation of pathways involved in synaptic plasticity, psychedelic interventions are believed to enhance the mechanisms underlying memory processing and extinction. Multi-modal approaches to patient care can use existing treatments in combination with psychedelics to improve the efficacy of current psychotherapies, producing rapid and lasting improvement to chronic physiological and psychological symptoms. Modern methods for predicting treatment response will allow clinicians to personalise psychedelic interventions to the individual, capitalising on quantitative evidence to provide precision medical care. This review serves to identify limitations of the current treatment paradigm for PTSD, highlight how emerging psychedelic interventions may offer a solution to these considerations and explore the promise of precision medicine approaches for the future of PTSD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251396255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145709318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251396253
Carina Joy Donegan, Dimitri Daldegan-Bueno, Rachael L Sumner, Anna Forsyth, Will Evans, Nicholas R Hoeh, Frederick Sundram, David Menkes, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Lisa Reynolds
Background: Depressive disorders affect approximately 280 million globally, with many finding treatments ineffective or limited by side effects. Growing evidence suggests that psychedelic therapies may help alleviate depressive symptoms. Among these, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) microdosing shows promise for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, research on LSD microdosing in clinical populations remains limited.
Objectives: This study aimed to understand the experiences of individuals participating in an open-label trial of LSD microdosing for MDD.
Design: Open-label pilot trial in target population (MDD; phase IIa).
Methods: Seventeen participants with MDD completed an 8-week LSD microdosing regimen, dosing twice weekly. Following the intervention, participants underwent semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Themes were grouped into five categories: enhanced self-determination, increased connectedness, improved cognitive processing, better emotional well-being, and negative effects.
Conclusion: Reported effects appeared to reinforce one another; that is, self-determination led to feeling more connected, which enhanced cognitive processing and ultimately improved emotional well-being and reduced depressive symptoms. However, this effect was not universal; some individuals reported negative effects or no significant improvement from microdosing LSD. This variability may be due to individual differences in response, insufficient dosage, or the treatment's lack of effectiveness for some individuals. The presence of side effects highlights the need for a careful titration protocol, while the lack of symptom improvement in some cases reinforces that microdosing is not a guaranteed solution, and expectations should remain realistic. The absence of a placebo control represents a key limitation as it precludes attribution of observed changes specifically to LSD.
Trial registration: ANZCTR, ACTRN12623000486628. Registered on 12 May 2023 (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385758).
{"title":"What is it like to microdose LSD for depression? a thematic analysis of participant interviews from an open-label trial.","authors":"Carina Joy Donegan, Dimitri Daldegan-Bueno, Rachael L Sumner, Anna Forsyth, Will Evans, Nicholas R Hoeh, Frederick Sundram, David Menkes, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Lisa Reynolds","doi":"10.1177/20451253251396253","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251396253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive disorders affect approximately 280 million globally, with many finding treatments ineffective or limited by side effects. Growing evidence suggests that psychedelic therapies may help alleviate depressive symptoms. Among these, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) microdosing shows promise for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, research on LSD microdosing in clinical populations remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to understand the experiences of individuals participating in an open-label trial of LSD microdosing for MDD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open-label pilot trial in target population (MDD; phase IIa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen participants with MDD completed an 8-week LSD microdosing regimen, dosing twice weekly. Following the intervention, participants underwent semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes were grouped into five categories: enhanced self-determination, increased connectedness, improved cognitive processing, better emotional well-being, and negative effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reported effects appeared to reinforce one another; that is, self-determination led to feeling more connected, which enhanced cognitive processing and ultimately improved emotional well-being and reduced depressive symptoms. However, this effect was not universal; some individuals reported negative effects or no significant improvement from microdosing LSD. This variability may be due to individual differences in response, insufficient dosage, or the treatment's lack of effectiveness for some individuals. The presence of side effects highlights the need for a careful titration protocol, while the lack of symptom improvement in some cases reinforces that microdosing is not a guaranteed solution, and expectations should remain realistic. The absence of a placebo control represents a key limitation as it precludes attribution of observed changes specifically to LSD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ANZCTR, ACTRN12623000486628. Registered on 12 May 2023 (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385758).</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251396253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145709303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251397590
Tiago Machado, Alexandra S L Rodrigues, João Costa
{"title":"Comment on: Effect of psilocybin therapy on suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths in people with psychiatric diagnoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tiago Machado, Alexandra S L Rodrigues, João Costa","doi":"10.1177/20451253251397590","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251397590","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251397590"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12678717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-25eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251397593
Jim van Schie, Peter Lucassen, Tom Birkenhäger, Sjoerd van Belkum, Mariska Bot, Suzanne Ligthart
Background: Many antidepressant users experience the process of stopping as challenging because of withdrawal symptoms. Support factors, such as patients experiencing empathy from their healthcare providers, potentially contribute to successful discontinuation.
Objectives: To examine the relation between experienced empathy and successful antidepressant discontinuation.
Design: Part of a larger prospective cohort study in major depressive disorder patients using sertraline or citalopram recruited through university medical centres and connected general practitioners, pharmacies and mental health institutions. The larger study aimed to identify factors associated with remission and patients' experiences with discontinuing antidepressants.
Method: Patients were followed for 24 months. We measured objective and subjective discontinuation success. Subjective discontinuation was measured with the Discontinuation Success Scale, a scale with three subscales (subjective feeling of success, positive and negative effects of discontinuation). Empathy was measured with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. To analyse the association between perceived empathy and discontinuation success, we used regression analyses.
Results: Of 918 participants in the larger study, 235 attempted discontinuation and 153 could be included in the analysis. About two-thirds of the participants were successful in discontinuing antidepressant medication. We did not find an association between perceived empathy and objective discontinuation success. Perceived empathy was positively associated with subjective success and negatively associated with the negative effects of discontinuation.
Conclusion: Although we could not demonstrate an association of perceived empathy and objective discontinuation, we consider the finding of a relation between subjective success as relevant because a successful experience regarding antidepressant discontinuation may positively influence the initiation of future attempts.
{"title":"The role of empathy in antidepressant withdrawal.","authors":"Jim van Schie, Peter Lucassen, Tom Birkenhäger, Sjoerd van Belkum, Mariska Bot, Suzanne Ligthart","doi":"10.1177/20451253251397593","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253251397593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many antidepressant users experience the process of stopping as challenging because of withdrawal symptoms. Support factors, such as patients experiencing empathy from their healthcare providers, potentially contribute to successful discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the relation between experienced empathy and successful antidepressant discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Part of a larger prospective cohort study in major depressive disorder patients using sertraline or citalopram recruited through university medical centres and connected general practitioners, pharmacies and mental health institutions. The larger study aimed to identify factors associated with remission and patients' experiences with discontinuing antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were followed for 24 months. We measured objective and subjective discontinuation success. Subjective discontinuation was measured with the Discontinuation Success Scale, a scale with three subscales (subjective feeling of success, positive and negative effects of discontinuation). Empathy was measured with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. To analyse the association between perceived empathy and discontinuation success, we used regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 918 participants in the larger study, 235 attempted discontinuation and 153 could be included in the analysis. About two-thirds of the participants were successful in discontinuing antidepressant medication. We did not find an association between perceived empathy and objective discontinuation success. Perceived empathy was positively associated with subjective success and negatively associated with the negative effects of discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although we could not demonstrate an association of perceived empathy and objective discontinuation, we consider the finding of a relation between subjective success as relevant because a successful experience regarding antidepressant discontinuation may positively influence the initiation of future attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251397593"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647550/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145640215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251392817
Aleksander Kwaśny, Wiesław Jerzy Cubała, Alina Wilkowska
Background: Intravenous ketamine is effective in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD) with dosing typically based on actual body weight (ABW).
Objective: This study examined whether alternative normalization formulas are associated with treatment response.
Design: A retrospective exploratory analysis of a naturalistic registry for short-term ketamine use.
Methods: A total of 22 TRBD inpatients received short-term intravenous ketamine. Doses were recalculated using the Boer and Devine formulas for lean body mass (LBM) and ideal body weight (IBW), and the Mosteller formula for body surface area (BSA). Calculated doses were compared with ABW dosing in responders and nonresponders.
Results: Using the Mosteller formula, BSA-normalized doses ranged from 17.63-23.09 mg/m2 in nonresponders and 15.73-23.89 mg/m2 in responders. LBM- and IBW-based recalculations at 0.5 mg/kg yielded lower relative doses, particularly among nonresponders, suggesting potential underdosing.
Conclusion: These preliminary findings do not support alternative dosing formulas over ABW, but replication in larger controlled studies is warranted.
{"title":"Ketamine dosing formula in treatment-resistant bipolar depression.","authors":"Aleksander Kwaśny, Wiesław Jerzy Cubała, Alina Wilkowska","doi":"10.1177/20451253251392817","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251392817","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous ketamine is effective in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD) with dosing typically based on actual body weight (ABW).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined whether alternative normalization formulas are associated with treatment response.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective exploratory analysis of a naturalistic registry for short-term ketamine use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 22 TRBD inpatients received short-term intravenous ketamine. Doses were recalculated using the Boer and Devine formulas for lean body mass (LBM) and ideal body weight (IBW), and the Mosteller formula for body surface area (BSA). Calculated doses were compared with ABW dosing in responders and nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the Mosteller formula, BSA-normalized doses ranged from 17.63-23.09 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in nonresponders and 15.73-23.89 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in responders. LBM- and IBW-based recalculations at 0.5 mg/kg yielded lower relative doses, particularly among nonresponders, suggesting potential underdosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings do not support alternative dosing formulas over ABW, but replication in larger controlled studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251392817"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145557954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251377191
Diana McHerron, Michaela Barber, Rachel Ham, Paul Liknaitzky, Adrian Carter, John Gardner
Background: Physical touch is often included as a supportive or therapeutic tool in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), involving instrumental forms of physical contact, supportive touch and somatic techniques. However, participants under the influence of psychedelics have reduced capacity to provide consent, are more suggestible and may experience and interpret therapeutic touch in ways they did not expect prior to taking the drug. Yet little research has been conducted on the considerations and approaches to therapeutic touch in clinical trials of PAT.
Objectives: This study explored the experiences and perspectives of PAT researchers on the use and consent to therapeutic touch in clinical trials of PAT.
Design: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
Methods: Sixteen PAT researchers involved in clinical trials of PAT were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The reporting of this study conforms to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist (COREQ).
Results: Three themes were uncovered through reflexive thematic analysis: (1) flexible frameworks, (2) therapeutic alliance and (3) boundary management. Researchers discussed consent challenges across the broad spectrum of physical contact existing in PAT protocols at the time. Researchers indicated that consent to therapeutic touch should be established prior to the dosing sessions and continually managed throughout the course of treatment. Flexibility in consent protocols enabled researchers to interpret and approach consent through the development of a strong therapeutic alliance; however, flexibility could also lead to challenges in boundary management. Researchers emphasised the need for greater ethical guidance in instances where trial participants change their established preferences during dosing sessions, and limits on expanding consent after drug administration.
Conclusion: Clear guidelines for obtaining consent, managing changing preferences and training on the management of boundary transgressions were viewed as essential for ethical research and practice of PAT.
{"title":"The ethical use of therapeutic touch in psychedelic-assisted therapy: a qualitative study of researcher perspectives and experiences.","authors":"Diana McHerron, Michaela Barber, Rachel Ham, Paul Liknaitzky, Adrian Carter, John Gardner","doi":"10.1177/20451253251377191","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251377191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical touch is often included as a supportive or therapeutic tool in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), involving instrumental forms of physical contact, supportive touch and somatic techniques. However, participants under the influence of psychedelics have reduced capacity to provide consent, are more suggestible and may experience and interpret therapeutic touch in ways they did not expect prior to taking the drug. Yet little research has been conducted on the considerations and approaches to therapeutic touch in clinical trials of PAT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored the experiences and perspectives of PAT researchers on the use and consent to therapeutic touch in clinical trials of PAT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen PAT researchers involved in clinical trials of PAT were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The reporting of this study conforms to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were uncovered through reflexive thematic analysis: (1) flexible frameworks, (2) therapeutic alliance and (3) boundary management. Researchers discussed consent challenges across the broad spectrum of physical contact existing in PAT protocols at the time. Researchers indicated that consent to therapeutic touch should be established prior to the dosing sessions and continually managed throughout the course of treatment. Flexibility in consent protocols enabled researchers to interpret and approach consent through the development of a strong therapeutic alliance; however, flexibility could also lead to challenges in boundary management. Researchers emphasised the need for greater ethical guidance in instances where trial participants change their established preferences during dosing sessions, and limits on expanding consent after drug administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clear guidelines for obtaining consent, managing changing preferences and training on the management of boundary transgressions were viewed as essential for ethical research and practice of PAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251377191"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618852/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145542549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251394127
Ahmed Elmosalamy, Idil Tarikogullari, Liliana Patarroyo-Rodriguez, Gwen Wilson, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Simon Kung, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh
Background: Depression affects approximately 5.7% of adults worldwide, and around one-third of these individuals develop treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (IV) ketamine and esketamine (administered IV or intranasally (IN)) are novel treatment options for TRD; however, only IN esketamine currently holds FDA approval.
Objectives: Compare the acute effectiveness of IV ketamine with esketamine (IV or IN) in adults with TRD.
Design: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of head-to-head studies. Response and remission at study end point were co-primary outcomes, expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored the impact of diagnosis, study type, and publication format; heterogeneity was quantified with I2.
Data sources and methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, APA Psycinfo, and Scopus were searched from inception through 19 March 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults with unipolar or bipolar depression directly comparing IV ketamine with esketamine and reporting response or remission.
Results: Screening 1089 records identified eight studies (n = 978). Seven observational studies (n = 915) comparing IV ketamine with IN esketamine were included in the meta-analysis, while one randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing IV formulations was summarized qualitatively. Pooled response from six studies gave OR = 1.26 (95% CI, 0.92-1.71; p = 0.15) and remission from seven studies gave OR = 1.31 (95% CI, 0.93-1.86; p = 0.12), both nonsignificantly favoring IV ketamine with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses excluding bipolar depression or abstract-only reports yielded similar effect estimates, reinforcing the robustness of the findings. Evidence across three studies for faster onset with IV ketamine ranged from significant in one study to modest trends in two.
Conclusion: Based on the currently available comparative evidence, which is almost entirely observational, IV ketamine and IN esketamine show comparable acute response and remission rates, though IV ketamine may act faster. Large head-to-head RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
Trial registration: The study protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/5jzev.
背景:抑郁症影响全球约5.7%的成年人,其中约三分之一的人患有难治性抑郁症(TRD)。静脉注射氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮(静脉或鼻内给药)是治疗TRD的新选择;然而,目前只有艾氯胺酮获得了FDA的批准。目的:比较静脉注射氯胺酮和静脉注射氯胺酮治疗成人TRD的急性疗效。设计:对头对头研究进行Mantel-Haenszel随机效应meta分析。研究结束时的缓解和缓解是共同的主要结局,用95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)表示。亚组分析和敏感性分析探讨了诊断、研究类型和出版格式的影响;异质性用i2量化。数据来源和方法:MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, APA Psycinfo, Scopus检索自成立至2025年3月19日。符合条件的研究纳入了患有单极或双相抑郁症的成年人,直接比较静脉注射氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮,并报告反应或缓解。结果:筛选1089份记录,确定了8项研究(n = 978)。meta分析纳入了7项比较静脉氯胺酮与静脉氯胺酮的观察性研究(n = 915),并对1项比较静脉氯胺酮处方的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了定性总结。6项研究的综合反应OR = 1.26 (95% CI, 0.92-1.71; p = 0.15), 7项研究的缓解OR = 1.31 (95% CI, 0.93-1.86; p = 0.12),均无显著性倾向于IV氯胺酮,异质性可忽略不计(I 2 = 0%)。敏感性分析排除双相抑郁症或仅摘要报告得出类似的效果估计,加强了研究结果的稳健性。三项研究的证据表明,静脉注射氯胺酮起效更快,其中一项研究的证据显著,而另两项研究的证据则较为温和。结论:根据目前可获得的比较证据,这些证据几乎完全是观察性的,静脉注射氯胺酮和静脉注射氯胺酮具有相当的急性反应和缓解率,尽管静脉注射氯胺酮可能更快起作用。需要大规模的头对头随机对照试验来证实这些发现。试验注册:研究方案在开放科学框架(OSF)上注册,网址为https://osf.io/5jzev。
{"title":"Intravenous ketamine versus esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Elmosalamy, Idil Tarikogullari, Liliana Patarroyo-Rodriguez, Gwen Wilson, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Simon Kung, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh","doi":"10.1177/20451253251394127","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251394127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression affects approximately 5.7% of adults worldwide, and around one-third of these individuals develop treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (IV) ketamine and esketamine (administered IV or intranasally (IN)) are novel treatment options for TRD; however, only IN esketamine currently holds FDA approval.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the acute effectiveness of IV ketamine with esketamine (IV or IN) in adults with TRD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of head-to-head studies. Response and remission at study end point were co-primary outcomes, expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored the impact of diagnosis, study type, and publication format; heterogeneity was quantified with <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, APA Psycinfo, and Scopus were searched from inception through 19 March 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults with unipolar or bipolar depression directly comparing IV ketamine with esketamine and reporting response or remission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening 1089 records identified eight studies (<i>n</i> = 978). Seven observational studies (<i>n</i> = 915) comparing IV ketamine with IN esketamine were included in the meta-analysis, while one randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing IV formulations was summarized qualitatively. Pooled response from six studies gave OR = 1.26 (95% CI, 0.92-1.71; <i>p</i> = 0.15) and remission from seven studies gave OR = 1.31 (95% CI, 0.93-1.86; <i>p</i> = 0.12), both nonsignificantly favoring IV ketamine with negligible heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). Sensitivity analyses excluding bipolar depression or abstract-only reports yielded similar effect estimates, reinforcing the robustness of the findings. Evidence across three studies for faster onset with IV ketamine ranged from significant in one study to modest trends in two.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the currently available comparative evidence, which is almost entirely observational, IV ketamine and IN esketamine show comparable acute response and remission rates, though IV ketamine may act faster. Large head-to-head RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/5jzev.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251394127"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12615959/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145542576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251395232
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/20451253251381074.].
[更正文章DOI: 10.1177/20451253251381074.]。
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Psychedelic Assisted Therapy as a Complex Intervention: Implications for clinical trial design\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/20451253251395232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253251395232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1177/20451253251381074.].</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251395232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602955/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Nonadherence jeopardizes treatment outcomes in the psychiatric care continuum. However, there was a paucity of data in the resource-limited life trajectories.
Objectives: This study sought to uncover the psychotropic medications adherence behavior of older adults with severe mental disorders and its modeling predictors.
Design: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in selected hospitals of the South Gondar Zone from March 1 to August 30, 2024.
Methods: A multistage sampling technique followed by stratified and systematic random sampling methods was employed. Data were collected via interviewer-administered semistructured questionnaire and medical record review. A medication adherence rating scale, medication regimen complexity index instrument, Oslo social support scale, drug attitude inventory scale, and internal stigma monitoring index scale were utilized to assess adherence, treatment regimen complexity, social/family support, attitudes toward treatment, and internal stigma, respectively. Ordinal logistic regression deciphered key predictors using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with a 95% confidence interval at p < 0.05.
Results: The study sample comprised 423 patients with severe psychiatric disorder (mean (SD) age, 67.3 (±11.9) years; 56.03%, 237 male). Among the participants 255 (60.28%, (95% CI: 58.86-62.11)) had suboptimal adherence behavior. Age, education status, adherence counseling, attitude toward treatment, memory aids, internal stigma, insight, social support, illicit drug use, comorbidity, ADRs, patient-level medication regimen complexity index, and polypharmacy were the predictors identified in the final model.
Conclusion: Despite multiple methodological limitations, this study suggests that suboptimal psychotropic medications adherence behavior was a critical challenge among older adults with severe mental disorders in geriatric mental healthcare in the Ethiopian hospital settings. We urge policymakers to devise evidence-based policies and strategies focusing on the identified predictors early on and intervene accordingly. Special attention should be given to individuals with low literacy levels, negative attitudes toward treatment, high internalized stigma, poor insight into their condition, substance use, comorbidities, adverse drug reactions, high levels of medication regimen complexity score, and those on polytherapy.
{"title":"Psychotropic medications adherence status and its determinants among older adults with severe affective and psychotic disorders: a multicenter cross-sectional study.","authors":"Woretaw Sisay Zewdu, Tigabu Eskeziya Zerihun, Desalegn Addis Mussie, Abel Temeche Kassaw, Taklo Simeneh Yazie, Tilaye Arega Moges","doi":"10.1177/20451253251387413","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251387413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonadherence jeopardizes treatment outcomes in the psychiatric care continuum. However, there was a paucity of data in the resource-limited life trajectories.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to uncover the psychotropic medications adherence behavior of older adults with severe mental disorders and its modeling predictors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in selected hospitals of the South Gondar Zone from March 1 to August 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multistage sampling technique followed by stratified and systematic random sampling methods was employed. Data were collected via interviewer-administered semistructured questionnaire and medical record review. A medication adherence rating scale, medication regimen complexity index instrument, Oslo social support scale, drug attitude inventory scale, and internal stigma monitoring index scale were utilized to assess adherence, treatment regimen complexity, social/family support, attitudes toward treatment, and internal stigma, respectively. Ordinal logistic regression deciphered key predictors using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with a 95% confidence interval at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comprised 423 patients with severe psychiatric disorder (mean (SD) age, 67.3 (±11.9) years; 56.03%, 237 male). Among the participants 255 (60.28%, (95% CI: 58.86-62.11)) had suboptimal adherence behavior. Age, education status, adherence counseling, attitude toward treatment, memory aids, internal stigma, insight, social support, illicit drug use, comorbidity, ADRs, patient-level medication regimen complexity index, and polypharmacy were the predictors identified in the final model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite multiple methodological limitations, this study suggests that suboptimal psychotropic medications adherence behavior was a critical challenge among older adults with severe mental disorders in geriatric mental healthcare in the Ethiopian hospital settings. We urge policymakers to devise evidence-based policies and strategies focusing on the identified predictors early on and intervene accordingly. Special attention should be given to individuals with low literacy levels, negative attitudes toward treatment, high internalized stigma, poor insight into their condition, substance use, comorbidities, adverse drug reactions, high levels of medication regimen complexity score, and those on polytherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251387413"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12586880/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20451253251386245
Minhal Mussawar, Sneha Chenji, Christine Bueno, Jennifer L Gordon
Background: Oral contraceptives (OC) offer a range of ethinyl estradiol (EE) doses and progestin types, with evidence indicating marked differences in cognitive and emotional abilities in OC users. However, it remains unclear whether dose variations in EE (low vs high) and progestin androgenicity (androgenic vs anti-androgenic) are associated with variations in cognitive and emotional abilities.
Objectives: Our study aimed to investigate the cognitive and emotional effects of various OC formulations.
Methods: Based on regular monophasic OC formulation use, 96 participants (26 ± 7 years) were recruited and categorised into one of four groups: low EE androgenic (n = 26), high EE androgenic (n = 24), low EE anti-androgenic (n = 21) and high EE anti-androgenic (n = 25). The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, emotion recognition task, and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were administered. Visual analogue scales were also administered to assess rejection sensitivity before and after a social exclusion task (Cyberball task). Analysis of variance (2 × 2) models were used to compare cognitive and socio-emotional abilities between groups.
Results: Anti-androgenic users demonstrated higher intensity ratings for emotional faces, and heightened feelings of insecurity after a social stressor. Overall positive and negative affect, as well as performance on objective cognitive tests, were similar across OC formulations.
Conclusion: In OC users, OC formulations containing an anti-androgenic progestin were associated with greater perceived intensity of emotional faces as well as heightened rejection sensitivity. However, these subtle differences in task performance did not translate to differences in overall affect or cognitive performance.
{"title":"Oral contraceptive formulation and socio-cognitive performance: a short communication.","authors":"Minhal Mussawar, Sneha Chenji, Christine Bueno, Jennifer L Gordon","doi":"10.1177/20451253251386245","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20451253251386245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral contraceptives (OC) offer a range of ethinyl estradiol (EE) doses and progestin types, with evidence indicating marked differences in cognitive and emotional abilities in OC users. However, it remains unclear whether dose variations in EE (low vs high) and progestin androgenicity (androgenic vs anti-androgenic) are associated with variations in cognitive and emotional abilities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aimed to investigate the cognitive and emotional effects of various OC formulations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Online between-subjects experimental design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on regular monophasic OC formulation use, 96 participants (26 ± 7 years) were recruited and categorised into one of four groups: low EE androgenic (<i>n</i> = 26), high EE androgenic (<i>n</i> = 24), low EE anti-androgenic (<i>n</i> = 21) and high EE anti-androgenic (<i>n</i> = 25). The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, emotion recognition task, and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were administered. Visual analogue scales were also administered to assess rejection sensitivity before and after a social exclusion task (Cyberball task). Analysis of variance (2 × 2) models were used to compare cognitive and socio-emotional abilities between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-androgenic users demonstrated higher intensity ratings for emotional faces, and heightened feelings of insecurity after a social stressor. Overall positive and negative affect, as well as performance on objective cognitive tests, were similar across OC formulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In OC users, OC formulations containing an anti-androgenic progestin were associated with greater perceived intensity of emotional faces as well as heightened rejection sensitivity. However, these subtle differences in task performance did not translate to differences in overall affect or cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251386245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12580508/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145446037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}