Yoshinori Funama, Takashi Shirasaka, Taiga Goto, Yuko Aoki, Kana Tanaka, Ryo Yoshida
{"title":"Iterative reconstruction with multifrequency signal recognition technology to improve low-contrast detectability: A phantom study.","authors":"Yoshinori Funama, Takashi Shirasaka, Taiga Goto, Yuko Aoki, Kana Tanaka, Ryo Yoshida","doi":"10.1177/20584601221109919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) and conventional IPV.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Low-contrast and water phantoms were used. Helical scans were conducted with the use of a CT scanner with 64 detectors. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp; the tube current was adjusted from 60 to 300 mA with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and from 20 to 150 mA with a slice thickness of 5.0 mm. Images were reconstructed with the FBP, conventional IPV, and IPV-LCD algorithms. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) model was applied in conjunction with the use of low-contrast modules in the low-contrast phantom. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and normalized NPS were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the same standard and strong levels, the IPV-LCD method improved low-contrast detectability compared with the conventional IPV, regardless of contrast-rod diameters. The mean CHO values at a slice thickness of 0.625 mm were 1.83, 3.28, 4.40, 4.53, and 5.27 for FBP, IPV STD, IPV-LCD STD, IPV STR, and IPV-LCD STR, respectively. The normalized NPS for the IPV-LCD STD and STR images were slightly shifted to the higher frequency compared with that for the FBP image.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPV-LCD images further improve the low-contrast detectability compared with FBP and conventional IPV images while maintaining similar FBP image appearances.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/6e/10.1177_20584601221109919.PMC9209785.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221109919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture.
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) and conventional IPV.
Materials and methods: Low-contrast and water phantoms were used. Helical scans were conducted with the use of a CT scanner with 64 detectors. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp; the tube current was adjusted from 60 to 300 mA with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and from 20 to 150 mA with a slice thickness of 5.0 mm. Images were reconstructed with the FBP, conventional IPV, and IPV-LCD algorithms. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) model was applied in conjunction with the use of low-contrast modules in the low-contrast phantom. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and normalized NPS were calculated.
Results: At the same standard and strong levels, the IPV-LCD method improved low-contrast detectability compared with the conventional IPV, regardless of contrast-rod diameters. The mean CHO values at a slice thickness of 0.625 mm were 1.83, 3.28, 4.40, 4.53, and 5.27 for FBP, IPV STD, IPV-LCD STD, IPV STR, and IPV-LCD STR, respectively. The normalized NPS for the IPV-LCD STD and STR images were slightly shifted to the higher frequency compared with that for the FBP image.
Conclusion: IPV-LCD images further improve the low-contrast detectability compared with FBP and conventional IPV images while maintaining similar FBP image appearances.