Iterative reconstruction with multifrequency signal recognition technology to improve low-contrast detectability: A phantom study.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2022-06-17 eCollection Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601221109919
Yoshinori Funama, Takashi Shirasaka, Taiga Goto, Yuko Aoki, Kana Tanaka, Ryo Yoshida
{"title":"Iterative reconstruction with multifrequency signal recognition technology to improve low-contrast detectability: A phantom study.","authors":"Yoshinori Funama,&nbsp;Takashi Shirasaka,&nbsp;Taiga Goto,&nbsp;Yuko Aoki,&nbsp;Kana Tanaka,&nbsp;Ryo Yoshida","doi":"10.1177/20584601221109919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) and conventional IPV.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Low-contrast and water phantoms were used. Helical scans were conducted with the use of a CT scanner with 64 detectors. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp; the tube current was adjusted from 60 to 300 mA with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and from 20 to 150 mA with a slice thickness of 5.0 mm. Images were reconstructed with the FBP, conventional IPV, and IPV-LCD algorithms. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) model was applied in conjunction with the use of low-contrast modules in the low-contrast phantom. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and normalized NPS were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the same standard and strong levels, the IPV-LCD method improved low-contrast detectability compared with the conventional IPV, regardless of contrast-rod diameters. The mean CHO values at a slice thickness of 0.625 mm were 1.83, 3.28, 4.40, 4.53, and 5.27 for FBP, IPV STD, IPV-LCD STD, IPV STR, and IPV-LCD STR, respectively. The normalized NPS for the IPV-LCD STD and STR images were slightly shifted to the higher frequency compared with that for the FBP image.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPV-LCD images further improve the low-contrast detectability compared with FBP and conventional IPV images while maintaining similar FBP image appearances.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/6e/10.1177_20584601221109919.PMC9209785.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601221109919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brain CT needs more attention to improve the extremely low image contrast and image texture.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of iterative progressive reconstruction with visual modeling (IPV) for the improvement of low-contrast detectability (IPV-LCD) compared with filtered backprojection (FBP) and conventional IPV.

Materials and methods: Low-contrast and water phantoms were used. Helical scans were conducted with the use of a CT scanner with 64 detectors. The tube voltage was set at 120 kVp; the tube current was adjusted from 60 to 300 mA with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and from 20 to 150 mA with a slice thickness of 5.0 mm. Images were reconstructed with the FBP, conventional IPV, and IPV-LCD algorithms. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) model was applied in conjunction with the use of low-contrast modules in the low-contrast phantom. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and normalized NPS were calculated.

Results: At the same standard and strong levels, the IPV-LCD method improved low-contrast detectability compared with the conventional IPV, regardless of contrast-rod diameters. The mean CHO values at a slice thickness of 0.625 mm were 1.83, 3.28, 4.40, 4.53, and 5.27 for FBP, IPV STD, IPV-LCD STD, IPV STR, and IPV-LCD STR, respectively. The normalized NPS for the IPV-LCD STD and STR images were slightly shifted to the higher frequency compared with that for the FBP image.

Conclusion: IPV-LCD images further improve the low-contrast detectability compared with FBP and conventional IPV images while maintaining similar FBP image appearances.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多频信号识别技术进行迭代重建以提高低对比度可检测性:一项幻象研究。
背景:颅脑CT图像对比度极低,图像纹理较差,亟待改善。目的:评价基于视觉建模的迭代渐进重建(IPV)与滤波反向投影(FBP)和传统IPV相比,在提高低对比度可检测性(IPV- lcd)方面的性能。材料与方法:采用低对比度和水影。螺旋扫描使用64个检测器的CT扫描仪进行。管电压设为120 kVp;管电流从60到300 mA,片厚为0.625 mm,从20到150 mA,片厚为5.0 mm。使用FBP、传统IPV和IPV- lcd算法重建图像。信道化霍特林观测器(CHO)模型与低对比度模体中的低对比度模块结合使用。计算了噪声功率谱(NPS)和归一化NPS。结果:在相同的标准和强水平下,无论对比棒直径如何,IPV- lcd方法都比传统IPV方法提高了低对比度检测能力。在0.625 mm切片厚度下,FBP、IPV STD、IPV- lcd STD、IPV STR、IPV- lcd STR的平均CHO值分别为1.83、3.28、4.40、4.53、5.27。与FBP图像相比,IPV-LCD STD和STR图像的归一化NPS略有向更高频率偏移。结论:IPV- lcd图像与FBP和常规IPV图像相比,在保持FBP图像相似外观的同时,进一步提高了低对比度可检测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model. Computed tomography patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cranial nerves bridging the middle ear and cerebellum causing cerebellar peduncle abscess: A case report. Invasive trigeminal ganglioneuroma: A case report and review of the literature. A case of primary osteosarcoma in the occipital bone: A relatively common tumor in an uncommon location.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1