Neurocircuitry of treatment in anxiety disorders

W. Tommy Baumel , Lu Lu , Xiaoqi Huang , Andrew T. Drysdale , John A. Sweeny , Qiyong Gong , Chad M. Sylvester , Jeffrey R. Strawn
{"title":"Neurocircuitry of treatment in anxiety disorders","authors":"W. Tommy Baumel ,&nbsp;Lu Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Huang ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Drysdale ,&nbsp;John A. Sweeny ,&nbsp;Qiyong Gong ,&nbsp;Chad M. Sylvester ,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Strawn","doi":"10.1016/j.bionps.2022.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding how treatments change neurobiology is critical to developing predictors of treatment response. This is especially true for anxiety disorders—the most common psychiatric disorders across the lifespan. With this in mind, we examined neurofunctional predictors of treatment response and neurofunctional changes associated with treatment across anxiety disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed/Medline was searched for prospective treatment studies that included parallel examinations of functional activation or connectivity (both task-based and resting state) in adults and youth with panic disorder and generalized, separation, and/or social anxiety disorders published before April 30, 2021. All studies examining baseline predictors or changes related to pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic treatment of <em>DSM-IV</em> and <em>DSM-5</em> anxiety disorders were included. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data as well as neurofunctional outcomes were extracted and summarized.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine studies examined changes in functional activation and/or connectivity (56 treatment arms) related to treatment and twenty-three examined neurofunctional predictors of treatment response. Predictors of treatment response and treatment-related neurofunctional changes were frequently observed within amygdala-prefrontal circuits. However, immense heterogeneity and few replication studies preclude a cohesive neurofunctional treatment response model across anxiety disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The extant literature describing neurofunctional aspects of treatment response in anxiety disorders is best viewed as a partially constructed scaffold on which to build a clinically translatable set of robust neuroimaging biomarkers that can be used to guide treatment and to select from available treatment. The construction of this understanding will require harmonization of analytic and task approaches, larger samples, and replication of component studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52767,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/3f/nihms-1815776.PMC9222661.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144622000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background

Understanding how treatments change neurobiology is critical to developing predictors of treatment response. This is especially true for anxiety disorders—the most common psychiatric disorders across the lifespan. With this in mind, we examined neurofunctional predictors of treatment response and neurofunctional changes associated with treatment across anxiety disorders.

Methods

PubMed/Medline was searched for prospective treatment studies that included parallel examinations of functional activation or connectivity (both task-based and resting state) in adults and youth with panic disorder and generalized, separation, and/or social anxiety disorders published before April 30, 2021. All studies examining baseline predictors or changes related to pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic treatment of DSM-IV and DSM-5 anxiety disorders were included. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data as well as neurofunctional outcomes were extracted and summarized.

Results

Twenty-nine studies examined changes in functional activation and/or connectivity (56 treatment arms) related to treatment and twenty-three examined neurofunctional predictors of treatment response. Predictors of treatment response and treatment-related neurofunctional changes were frequently observed within amygdala-prefrontal circuits. However, immense heterogeneity and few replication studies preclude a cohesive neurofunctional treatment response model across anxiety disorders.

Conclusions

The extant literature describing neurofunctional aspects of treatment response in anxiety disorders is best viewed as a partially constructed scaffold on which to build a clinically translatable set of robust neuroimaging biomarkers that can be used to guide treatment and to select from available treatment. The construction of this understanding will require harmonization of analytic and task approaches, larger samples, and replication of component studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑症的神经回路治疗
了解治疗如何改变神经生物学对于开发治疗反应的预测因子至关重要。这对焦虑症来说尤其如此——焦虑症是一生中最常见的精神疾病。考虑到这一点,我们检查了治疗反应的神经功能预测因子和与焦虑症治疗相关的神经功能变化。方法spubmed /Medline检索前瞻性治疗研究,包括在2021年4月30日之前发表的成人和青少年惊恐障碍和广泛性、分离和/或社交焦虑症患者的功能激活或连通性(任务型和静息状态)的平行检查。所有检查与DSM-IV和DSM-5焦虑症的药理学和心理治疗相关的基线预测因子或变化的研究均被纳入。提取并总结了人口统计学、临床和治疗数据以及神经功能结果。结果29项研究检查了与治疗相关的功能激活和/或连通性的变化(56个治疗组),23项研究检查了治疗反应的神经功能预测因子。在杏仁核-前额叶回路中经常观察到治疗反应和治疗相关神经功能改变的预测因子。然而,巨大的异质性和很少的复制研究排除了跨焦虑症的凝聚力神经功能治疗反应模型。结论:现有的描述焦虑症治疗反应的神经功能方面的文献最好被视为一个部分构建的支架,在此基础上建立一套临床可翻译的强大的神经成像生物标志物,可用于指导治疗和选择可用的治疗方法。这种理解的构建将需要分析和任务方法的协调,更大的样本,以及组成部分研究的复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biomarker discovery using machine learning in the psychosis spectrum Biomarkers of thrombotic tendency in schizophrenia and related psychoses: Implications for the potential usefulness of anticoagulants in schizophrenia Affective processing in aphantasia and potential overlaps with alexithymia: Mental imagery facilitates the recognition of emotions in oneself and others Using data processing to understand inconsistency in smartphone behavior among patients with serious mental illness: Results of a digital phenotyping biomarker study An emotional distress biomarker in pregnant women: Ultra-short-term heart rate variability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1