Age-based treatment differences in and reluctance to treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy - a mixed-method pilot study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-28 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2022.2089330
Elke L M Ter Haar, Marcia Tummers, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Peter C M van de Kerkhof, Elke M G J de Jong, Satish F K Lubeek
{"title":"Age-based treatment differences in and reluctance to treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy - a mixed-method pilot study.","authors":"Elke L M Ter Haar,&nbsp;Marcia Tummers,&nbsp;Ewald M Bronkhorst,&nbsp;Peter C M van de Kerkhof,&nbsp;Elke M G J de Jong,&nbsp;Satish F K Lubeek","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2089330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based guidance in older adults (≥65 years) with psoriasis is sparse and undertreatment might be present.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess prescribing patterns, comfort levels, barriers and needs of dermatologists when treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used including a survey among all Dutch dermatologists and residents, followed by semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the survey respondents applied systemic treatment to the same extent in older versus younger patients (<i>n</i> = 49; 67.1%) and weren't reluctant prescribing systemic therapy (<i>n</i> = 50; 68.5%) in older adults. However, 26% (<i>n</i> = 19) of the respondents treated older adults less often with systemic therapy compared to younger patients and 68.1% (<i>n</i> = 49) performed additional actions in older adults, e.g. intensified monitoring or dose reduction. Based on the survey and interviews (<i>n</i> = 10), the main reasons for these age-based treatment differences were comorbidity, comedication, and fear of adverse events. More evidence-based guidance, education, and time to assess older adults were identified as most important needs, especially regarding frailty screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age-based treatment differences in and reluctance to treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy were common. There is a need for more evidence-based guidance, education, and consultation time, to improve treatment in this growing population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"2983-2990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2089330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based guidance in older adults (≥65 years) with psoriasis is sparse and undertreatment might be present.

Objectives: To assess prescribing patterns, comfort levels, barriers and needs of dermatologists when treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy.

Methods: A mixed-methods design was used including a survey among all Dutch dermatologists and residents, followed by semi-structured interviews.

Results: Most of the survey respondents applied systemic treatment to the same extent in older versus younger patients (n = 49; 67.1%) and weren't reluctant prescribing systemic therapy (n = 50; 68.5%) in older adults. However, 26% (n = 19) of the respondents treated older adults less often with systemic therapy compared to younger patients and 68.1% (n = 49) performed additional actions in older adults, e.g. intensified monitoring or dose reduction. Based on the survey and interviews (n = 10), the main reasons for these age-based treatment differences were comorbidity, comedication, and fear of adverse events. More evidence-based guidance, education, and time to assess older adults were identified as most important needs, especially regarding frailty screening.

Conclusions: Age-based treatment differences in and reluctance to treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy were common. There is a need for more evidence-based guidance, education, and consultation time, to improve treatment in this growing population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于年龄的治疗差异和老年人不愿接受全身抗银屑病治疗——一项混合方法的试点研究。
背景:针对银屑病老年人(≥65岁)的循证指导很少,可能存在治疗不足。目的:评估老年人全身性抗银屑病治疗的处方模式、舒适度、障碍和皮肤科医生的需求。方法:采用混合方法设计,包括对所有荷兰皮肤科医生和住院医师进行调查,然后进行半结构化访谈。结果:大多数调查应答者在老年和年轻患者中应用了相同程度的全身治疗(n = 49;67.1%),不愿开全身性治疗(n = 50;68.5%)。然而,与年轻患者相比,26% (n = 19)的应答者对老年人进行全身治疗的频率较低,68.1% (n = 49)的应答者对老年人采取了额外的措施,例如加强监测或减少剂量。根据调查和访谈(n = 10),这些基于年龄的治疗差异的主要原因是合并症、药物治疗和对不良事件的恐惧。更多基于证据的指导、教育和评估老年人的时间被认为是最重要的需求,特别是在虚弱筛查方面。结论:基于年龄的治疗差异和不愿接受全身抗银屑病治疗的老年人是常见的。需要更多基于证据的指导、教育和咨询时间,以改善这一不断增长的人口的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
期刊最新文献
Boxed warnings for dermatologic JAK inhibitors: are they standardized worldwide? A review of biosimilars in psoriasis: impacts on efficacy, safety, access, and a first-hand look at biosimilar cost savings within the department of veterans affairs Postoperative risk assessment of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and the efficacy of delayed prevention following 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized controlled study. Biodegradable polymers and platelet-rich plasma causing visual impairment: a literature review. Exploring the effect of deucravacitinib in patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1