Ying Yu, Siyuan Chen, Samantha Jean Jones, Rawnak Hoque, Olga Vishnyakova, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Brad McNeney
{"title":"Penalized Logistic Regression Analysis for Genetic Association Studies of Binary Phenotypes.","authors":"Ying Yu, Siyuan Chen, Samantha Jean Jones, Rawnak Hoque, Olga Vishnyakova, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Brad McNeney","doi":"10.1159/000525650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasingly, logistic regression methods for genetic association studies of binary phenotypes must be able to accommodate data sparsity, which arises from unbalanced case-control ratios and/or rare genetic variants. Sparseness leads to maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of log-OR parameters that are biased away from their null value of zero and tests with inflated type 1 errors. Different penalized-likelihood methods have been developed to mitigate sparse-data bias. We study penalized logistic regression using a class of log-F priors indexed by a shrinkage parameter m to shrink the biased MLE towards zero. For a given m, log-F-penalized logistic regression may be easily implemented using data augmentation and standard software.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We propose a two-step approach to the analysis of a genetic association study: first, a set of variants that show evidence of association with the trait is used to estimate m; and second, the estimated m is used for log-F-penalized logistic regression analyses of all variants using data augmentation with standard software. Our estimate of m is the maximizer of a marginal likelihood obtained by integrating the latent log-ORs out of the joint distribution of the parameters and observed data. We consider two approximate approaches to maximizing the marginal likelihood: (i) a Monte Carlo EM algorithm (MCEM) and (ii) a Laplace approximation (LA) to each integral, followed by derivative-free optimization of the approximation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluate the statistical properties of our proposed two-step method and compared its performance to other shrinkage methods by a simulation study. Our simulation studies suggest that the proposed log-F-penalized approach has lower bias and mean squared error than other methods considered. We also illustrate the approach on data from a study of genetic associations with \"super senior\" cases and middle aged controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>We have proposed a method for single rare variant analysis with binary phenotypes by logistic regression penalized by log-F priors. Our method has the advantage of being easily extended to correct for confounding due to population structure and genetic relatedness through a data augmentation approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13226,"journal":{"name":"Human Heredity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Increasingly, logistic regression methods for genetic association studies of binary phenotypes must be able to accommodate data sparsity, which arises from unbalanced case-control ratios and/or rare genetic variants. Sparseness leads to maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of log-OR parameters that are biased away from their null value of zero and tests with inflated type 1 errors. Different penalized-likelihood methods have been developed to mitigate sparse-data bias. We study penalized logistic regression using a class of log-F priors indexed by a shrinkage parameter m to shrink the biased MLE towards zero. For a given m, log-F-penalized logistic regression may be easily implemented using data augmentation and standard software.
Method: We propose a two-step approach to the analysis of a genetic association study: first, a set of variants that show evidence of association with the trait is used to estimate m; and second, the estimated m is used for log-F-penalized logistic regression analyses of all variants using data augmentation with standard software. Our estimate of m is the maximizer of a marginal likelihood obtained by integrating the latent log-ORs out of the joint distribution of the parameters and observed data. We consider two approximate approaches to maximizing the marginal likelihood: (i) a Monte Carlo EM algorithm (MCEM) and (ii) a Laplace approximation (LA) to each integral, followed by derivative-free optimization of the approximation.
Results: We evaluate the statistical properties of our proposed two-step method and compared its performance to other shrinkage methods by a simulation study. Our simulation studies suggest that the proposed log-F-penalized approach has lower bias and mean squared error than other methods considered. We also illustrate the approach on data from a study of genetic associations with "super senior" cases and middle aged controls.
Discussion/conclusion: We have proposed a method for single rare variant analysis with binary phenotypes by logistic regression penalized by log-F priors. Our method has the advantage of being easily extended to correct for confounding due to population structure and genetic relatedness through a data augmentation approach.
期刊介绍:
Gathering original research reports and short communications from all over the world, ''Human Heredity'' is devoted to methodological and applied research on the genetics of human populations, association and linkage analysis, genetic mechanisms of disease, and new methods for statistical genetics, for example, analysis of rare variants and results from next generation sequencing. The value of this information to many branches of medicine is shown by the number of citations the journal receives in fields ranging from immunology and hematology to epidemiology and public health planning, and the fact that at least 50% of all ''Human Heredity'' papers are still cited more than 8 years after publication (according to ISI Journal Citation Reports). Special issues on methodological topics (such as ‘Consanguinity and Genomics’ in 2014; ‘Analyzing Rare Variants in Complex Diseases’ in 2012) or reviews of advances in particular fields (‘Genetic Diversity in European Populations: Evolutionary Evidence and Medical Implications’ in 2014; ‘Genes and the Environment in Obesity’ in 2013) are published every year. Renowned experts in the field are invited to contribute to these special issues.