Does High-Dose Thromboprophylaxis Improve Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients? A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2022-10-19 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1930-6492
Maha A T Elsebaie, Binav Baral, Mai Elsebaie, Trilok Shrivastava, Catherine Weir, Dennis Kumi, Noah W Birch
{"title":"Does High-Dose Thromboprophylaxis Improve Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients? A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.","authors":"Maha A T Elsebaie,&nbsp;Binav Baral,&nbsp;Mai Elsebaie,&nbsp;Trilok Shrivastava,&nbsp;Catherine Weir,&nbsp;Dennis Kumi,&nbsp;Noah W Birch","doi":"10.1055/a-1930-6492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Thromboembolism remains a detrimental complication of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) despite the use of prophylactic doses of anticoagulation <b>Objectives</b>  This study aimed to compare different thromboprophylaxis strategies in COVID-19 patients <b>Methods</b>  We conducted a systematic database search until June 30, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies that compared prophylactic to intermediate or therapeutic doses of anticoagulation in adult patients with COVID-19, admitted to general wards or intensive care unit (ICU). Primary outcomes were mortality, thromboembolism, and bleeding events. Data are analyzed separately in RCTs and non-RCTs and in ICU and non-ICU patients. <b>Results.</b>  We identified 682 studies and included 53 eligible studies. Therapeutic anticoagulation showed no mortality benefit over prophylactic anticoagulation in four RCTs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-2.54). Therapeutic anticoagulation didn't improve mortality in ICU or non-ICU patients. Risk of thromboembolism was significantly lower among non-ICU patients who received enhanced (therapeutic/intermediate) anticoagulation (OR = 0.21, 95% CI, 0.06-0.74). Two additional RCTs (Multiplatform Trial and HEP-COVID), not included in quantitative meta-analysis, analyzed non-ICU patients, and reported a similar benefit with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding events among non-randomized studies (OR = 3.45, 95% CI, 2.32-5.13). Among RCTs, although patients who received therapeutic-dose anticoagulation had higher numbers of bleeding events, these differences were not statistically significant. Studies comparing prophylactic and intermediate-dose anticoagulation showed no differences in primary outcomes. <b>Conclusion</b>  There is a lack of mortality benefit with therapeutic-dose over prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in ICU and non-ICU COVID-19 patients. Therapeutic anticoagulation significantly decreased risk of thromboembolism risk in some of the available RCTs, especially among non-ICU patients. This potential benefit, however, may be counter balanced by higher risk of bleeding. Individualized assessment of patient's bleeding risk will ultimately impact the true clinical benefit of anticoagulation in each patient. Finally, we found no mortality or morbidity benefit with intermediate-dose anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581586/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1930-6492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background  Thromboembolism remains a detrimental complication of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) despite the use of prophylactic doses of anticoagulation Objectives  This study aimed to compare different thromboprophylaxis strategies in COVID-19 patients Methods  We conducted a systematic database search until June 30, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies that compared prophylactic to intermediate or therapeutic doses of anticoagulation in adult patients with COVID-19, admitted to general wards or intensive care unit (ICU). Primary outcomes were mortality, thromboembolism, and bleeding events. Data are analyzed separately in RCTs and non-RCTs and in ICU and non-ICU patients. Results.  We identified 682 studies and included 53 eligible studies. Therapeutic anticoagulation showed no mortality benefit over prophylactic anticoagulation in four RCTs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-2.54). Therapeutic anticoagulation didn't improve mortality in ICU or non-ICU patients. Risk of thromboembolism was significantly lower among non-ICU patients who received enhanced (therapeutic/intermediate) anticoagulation (OR = 0.21, 95% CI, 0.06-0.74). Two additional RCTs (Multiplatform Trial and HEP-COVID), not included in quantitative meta-analysis, analyzed non-ICU patients, and reported a similar benefit with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding events among non-randomized studies (OR = 3.45, 95% CI, 2.32-5.13). Among RCTs, although patients who received therapeutic-dose anticoagulation had higher numbers of bleeding events, these differences were not statistically significant. Studies comparing prophylactic and intermediate-dose anticoagulation showed no differences in primary outcomes. Conclusion  There is a lack of mortality benefit with therapeutic-dose over prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in ICU and non-ICU COVID-19 patients. Therapeutic anticoagulation significantly decreased risk of thromboembolism risk in some of the available RCTs, especially among non-ICU patients. This potential benefit, however, may be counter balanced by higher risk of bleeding. Individualized assessment of patient's bleeding risk will ultimately impact the true clinical benefit of anticoagulation in each patient. Finally, we found no mortality or morbidity benefit with intermediate-dose anticoagulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大剂量血栓预防是否能改善COVID-19患者的预后?比较研究的元分析。
背景:尽管使用了预防性剂量的抗凝药物,但血栓栓塞仍然是新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的有害并发症。目的:本研究旨在比较COVID-19患者的不同血栓预防策略。符合条件的研究是随机研究(rct)和非随机研究,比较了普通病房或重症监护病房(ICU)住院的成年COVID-19患者的预防剂量、中间剂量或治疗剂量抗凝治疗。主要结局是死亡率、血栓栓塞和出血事件。分别对rct和非rct、ICU和非ICU患者的数据进行分析。结果。我们确定了682项研究,其中包括53项符合条件的研究。在4项随机对照试验中,治疗性抗凝治疗在死亡率上没有优于预防性抗凝治疗(优势比[OR] = 0.67, 95%可信区间[CI], 0.18-2.54)。治疗性抗凝治疗对ICU患者和非ICU患者的死亡率没有改善。接受强化(治疗性/中度)抗凝治疗的非icu患者发生血栓栓塞的风险显著降低(OR = 0.21, 95% CI, 0.06-0.74)。另外两项rct (Multiplatform Trial和HEP-COVID)未纳入定量荟萃分析,分析了非icu患者,并报告了治疗剂量抗凝的类似益处。在非随机研究中,治疗性抗凝与出血事件的风险显著升高相关(OR = 3.45, 95% CI, 2.32-5.13)。在随机对照试验中,虽然接受治疗剂量抗凝治疗的患者出血事件较多,但这些差异没有统计学意义。比较预防性抗凝和中剂量抗凝的研究显示,主要结果没有差异。结论在重症监护病房和非重症监护病房的COVID-19患者中,治疗剂量抗凝治疗与预防剂量抗凝治疗在死亡率上缺乏优势。在一些可用的随机对照试验中,治疗性抗凝显著降低了血栓栓塞的风险,特别是在非icu患者中。然而,这种潜在的好处可能会被更高的出血风险抵消。对患者出血风险的个体化评估将最终影响每位患者抗凝治疗的真正临床获益。最后,我们发现中剂量抗凝治疗没有死亡率或发病率方面的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Urgent Bleeding in Patients with Hemophilia A: Focus on the Use of Emicizumab Disease Burden, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life in People with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in Europe: Analyses from CHESS II/CHESS PAEDs TH Open Continues to Highlight the State-of-the-Art on Thrombosis and Hemostasis with a Renewed Editorial Board The Effect of Rituximab on Antiphospholipid Titers in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Potential for a Virtual Care Model in the Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1