Grounding and Applying an Ethical Test to Organisations as Moral Agents: The Case of Mondragon Corporation.

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Philosophy of Management Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s40926-022-00196-2
David Ardagh
{"title":"Grounding and Applying an Ethical Test to Organisations as Moral Agents: The Case of Mondragon Corporation.","authors":"David Ardagh","doi":"10.1007/s40926-022-00196-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral people (i) have good goals in acting in a challenging situation; and (ii) use their rightly disposed intellectual and voluntary capacities (virtues) and resources to choose a good action in that situation. This requires (iii) sound ethical deliberation and decision-procedures for realising practically the abstract values and principles relevant in the concrete situation. After deliberation about sub-goals and means, they (iv) choose to execute the best particular action plan. They will have canvassed possible outcomes of the intended act, which, when executed, will have a particular result and (v) consequent outcomes for themselves, and for others; and (vi) it will show respect for the wellbeing of the community or wider society, represented by the state, and reflected in state law. A comprehensive third-party moral judgement on the act will encompass the intention and execution of the act in the situation. Part 1, Sections I-IV of this paper argue that organisations can be said to be quasi-persons, personal and moral. As artificial organisational quasi-persons, with a similar structure to natural persons, they can also have analogues of the moral features of natural persons' moral acts: i)-vi): good goals, rightly disposed capacities and resources, ethical decision procedures, good acts or activities, with good outcomes for others, and respect for society's norms represented in state law. An ethical acronym, GREAOS, capturing the six dominant features shared with natural persons, is suggested. In Part 2, an application of GREAOS is then made to assess a concrete organisational case, Mondragon Corporation, in order to show how if the analogy between persons and organisations is sound in principle, the acronym's application can be made to ethically unpack a case. The acronym gives Mondragon Corporation at least a pass on ethics. Although a work in progress, its success in realising ideals of economic democracy can be an exemplar of stakeholder capitalism, an alternative to an unbridled shareholder capitalism, which has had its day.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40926-022-00196-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":54136,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00196-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moral people (i) have good goals in acting in a challenging situation; and (ii) use their rightly disposed intellectual and voluntary capacities (virtues) and resources to choose a good action in that situation. This requires (iii) sound ethical deliberation and decision-procedures for realising practically the abstract values and principles relevant in the concrete situation. After deliberation about sub-goals and means, they (iv) choose to execute the best particular action plan. They will have canvassed possible outcomes of the intended act, which, when executed, will have a particular result and (v) consequent outcomes for themselves, and for others; and (vi) it will show respect for the wellbeing of the community or wider society, represented by the state, and reflected in state law. A comprehensive third-party moral judgement on the act will encompass the intention and execution of the act in the situation. Part 1, Sections I-IV of this paper argue that organisations can be said to be quasi-persons, personal and moral. As artificial organisational quasi-persons, with a similar structure to natural persons, they can also have analogues of the moral features of natural persons' moral acts: i)-vi): good goals, rightly disposed capacities and resources, ethical decision procedures, good acts or activities, with good outcomes for others, and respect for society's norms represented in state law. An ethical acronym, GREAOS, capturing the six dominant features shared with natural persons, is suggested. In Part 2, an application of GREAOS is then made to assess a concrete organisational case, Mondragon Corporation, in order to show how if the analogy between persons and organisations is sound in principle, the acronym's application can be made to ethically unpack a case. The acronym gives Mondragon Corporation at least a pass on ethics. Although a work in progress, its success in realising ideals of economic democracy can be an exemplar of stakeholder capitalism, an alternative to an unbridled shareholder capitalism, which has had its day.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40926-022-00196-2.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织作为道德主体的伦理检验:蒙德拉贡公司的案例。
有道德的人(i)在具有挑战性的情况下有良好的目标;(2)运用他们正确分配的智力和自愿能力(美德)和资源在那种情况下选择一个好的行为。这需要(iii)健全的伦理审议和决策程序,以便实际实现与具体情况有关的抽象价值和原则。在考虑了子目标和手段之后,他们(iv)选择执行最佳的特定行动计划。他们将仔细考虑预期行为的可能结果,这些结果在执行时将对自己和他人产生特定的结果和(v)随之而来的结果;(vi)它将体现对社区或更广泛社会福祉的尊重,以国家为代表,并反映在国家法律中。一个全面的第三方对行为的道德判断将包括该行为在该情境下的意图和执行。第1部分,本文的第I-IV节认为,组织可以说是准人,个人和道德。作为与自然人结构相似的人工组织类人,他们也可以具有类似自然人道德行为的道德特征:i)-vi):良好的目标,正确配置的能力和资源,道德决策程序,良好的行为或活动,对他人有良好的结果,以及尊重国家法律所代表的社会规范。提出了一个伦理首字母缩略词GREAOS,它包含了与自然人共有的六个主要特征。在第2部分,GREAOS的应用程序,然后评估一个具体的组织案例,蒙德拉贡公司,为了显示如何,如果个人和组织之间的类比在原则上是合理的,首字母缩略词的应用程序可以做出道德地解包一个案例。这个首字母缩略词至少让蒙德拉贡公司在道德规范上过关了。尽管这项工作仍在进行中,但它在实现经济民主理想方面的成功,可以成为利益相关者资本主义的一个典范,替代已经风光不再的肆无忌惮的股东资本主义。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40926-022-00196-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Philosophy of Management addresses all aspects of the philosophical foundations of management in theory and practice, including business ethics, ontology, epistemology, aesthetics and politics.  The application of philosophical disciplines to issues facing managers are increasingly recognized to include organizational purpose, performance measurement, the status of ethics, employee privacy, and limitations on the right to manage. Philosophy of Management is an independent, refereed forum that focuses on these central philosophical issues of management in theory and practice. The journal is open to contributions from all philosophical schools and traditions.  Since 2001 the journal has published three issues per year, each focused on a particular topic. Published contributors include René ten Bos, Ghislain Deslandes, Juan Fontrodona, Michelle Greenwood, Jeremy Moon, Geoff Moore, Duncan Pritchard, and Duane Windsor. This journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure.
期刊最新文献
How do you find the Crack? A Report on a ‘Philosophical Methods’ Workshop Freedom in Business: Elizabeth Anderson, Adam Smith, and the Effects of Dominance in Business Organizational Resilience through the Philosophical Lens of Aristotelian and Heraclitean Philosophy Technological Evolution and Cooperative Identity: A Genealogical Analysis using Simondon's Cybernetic Process Philosophy “You Can’t Say That”: A Normative Account of Speech Rights and Limits in Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1