Preliminary validation of the Turkish version of the pain catastrophizing scale for children and parents (PCS-C and PCS-P) in primary childhood headache.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.14744/agri.2021.92195
İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk, Egemen Ünal, Mahmut Cem Tarakçıoğlu, Müge Kepekçi, Edibe Pembegül Yıldız
{"title":"Preliminary validation of the Turkish version of the pain catastrophizing scale for children and parents (PCS-C and PCS-P) in primary childhood headache.","authors":"İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk,&nbsp;Egemen Ünal,&nbsp;Mahmut Cem Tarakçıoğlu,&nbsp;Müge Kepekçi,&nbsp;Edibe Pembegül Yıldız","doi":"10.14744/agri.2021.92195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe aims of this study were to translate the pain catastrophizing scale for children and parents (PCS-C and PCS-P) into Turkish (TurPCS-C and TurPCS-P) and evaluate the psychometric properties in children with primary headache.\n\n\nMETHODS\nExploratory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity. Reliability was measured using item-total score correlation, internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient), Cronbach α if the item was deleted, and test-retest correlation. Concurrent validity and convergent validity of the scales were correlated with other scales (Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale [RCADS], RCADS Parent RCADS-P, Quality of Life Scale for Children [PedsQL], and PedsQL-Parents [PedsQL-P]) and some related features (pain intensity, mobile phone usage time, and headache duration).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 80 children participating in the study, 55 (68.8%) were girls and 25 (31.2%) were boys. It was determined that the original three-factor structure was not supported for TurPCS-C and TurPCS-P. Cronbach α value was 0.871 for TurPCS-C consisting of 12 items, and Cronbach α value was 0.890 for TurPCS-P consisting of 12 items. As the PedsQL score increased, there was a negative correlation (p<0.05, r=-0.575) in all three areas of TurPCS-C, and there was a positive correlation (p<0.05) among the scores from the RCADS scale and TurPCS-C. Similarly, there was a negative correlation with PedsQL-P and TurPCS-P and positive correlation with RCADS-P and TurPCS-P (p<0.05 for each).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nTurPCS-C and TurPCS-P are an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity and reliability, and it can be reliably used to examine pediatric patients with primary headache.","PeriodicalId":45603,"journal":{"name":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2021.92195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to translate the pain catastrophizing scale for children and parents (PCS-C and PCS-P) into Turkish (TurPCS-C and TurPCS-P) and evaluate the psychometric properties in children with primary headache. METHODS Exploratory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity. Reliability was measured using item-total score correlation, internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient), Cronbach α if the item was deleted, and test-retest correlation. Concurrent validity and convergent validity of the scales were correlated with other scales (Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale [RCADS], RCADS Parent RCADS-P, Quality of Life Scale for Children [PedsQL], and PedsQL-Parents [PedsQL-P]) and some related features (pain intensity, mobile phone usage time, and headache duration). RESULTS Of the 80 children participating in the study, 55 (68.8%) were girls and 25 (31.2%) were boys. It was determined that the original three-factor structure was not supported for TurPCS-C and TurPCS-P. Cronbach α value was 0.871 for TurPCS-C consisting of 12 items, and Cronbach α value was 0.890 for TurPCS-P consisting of 12 items. As the PedsQL score increased, there was a negative correlation (p<0.05, r=-0.575) in all three areas of TurPCS-C, and there was a positive correlation (p<0.05) among the scores from the RCADS scale and TurPCS-C. Similarly, there was a negative correlation with PedsQL-P and TurPCS-P and positive correlation with RCADS-P and TurPCS-P (p<0.05 for each). CONCLUSION TurPCS-C and TurPCS-P are an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity and reliability, and it can be reliably used to examine pediatric patients with primary headache.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版儿童及家长疼痛灾变量表(PCS-C和PCS-P)对儿童原发性头痛的初步验证。
目的:本研究的目的是将儿童和家长疼痛灾难化量表(PCS-C和PCS-P)翻译成土耳其语(TurPCS-C和TurPCS-P),并评估原发性头痛儿童的心理测量特征。方法:采用探索性因素分析对构念效度进行检验。信度采用项目总分相关、内部一致性(Cronbach α系数)、删除项目时的Cronbach α和重测相关来衡量。量表的并发效度和收敛效度与其他量表(修订儿童焦虑抑郁量表[RCADS]、RCADS家长RCADS- p、儿童生活质量量表[PedsQL]、儿童生活质量量表-父母生活质量量表[PedsQL- p])及相关特征(疼痛强度、手机使用时间、头痛持续时间)相关。结果:80名参与研究的儿童中,女孩55名(68.8%),男孩25名(31.2%)。确定TurPCS-C和TurPCS-P不支持原有的三因子结构。包含12个条目的TurPCS-C的Cronbach α值为0.871,包含12个条目的TurPCS-P的Cronbach α值为0.890。结论:TurPCS-C和TurPCS-P是一种具有足够效度和信度的评估工具,可可靠地用于儿科原发性头痛患者的检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency therapy in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain: An analysis of single-center data. The effectiveness of the erector spinae plane block using methylprednisolone and bupivacaine in post-herpetic neuralgia: Case series. The effect of consecutive facet medial branch radiofrequency denervation and dorsal root ganglion pulse radiofrequency therapy on lumbar facet joint pain. [Pain beliefs of cancer patients and associated factors]. Effect of physical activity level on pain, functionality, and quality of life in migraine patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1