Correlation Between Long-Term Acetylsalicylic Acid Use and Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA. Should We Reduce the PSA Cut-off for Patients in Chronic Therapy? A Multicenter Study.

IF 2 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2022-10-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S377510
Guglielmo Mantica, Francesco Chierigo, Farzana Cassim, Francesca Ambrosini, Stefano Tappero, Rafaela Malinaric, Stefano Parodi, Andrea Benelli, Federico Dotta, Marco Ennas, Martina Beverini, Chiara Vaccaro, Salvatore Smelzo, Giovanni Guano, Federico Mariano, Calogero Paola, Giorgia Granelli, Virginia Varca, Carlo Introini, Salvatore Dioguardi, Alchiede Simonato, Andrea Gregori, Franco Gaboardi, Carlo Terrone, André Van der Merwe
{"title":"Correlation Between Long-Term Acetylsalicylic Acid Use and Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA. Should We Reduce the PSA Cut-off for Patients in Chronic Therapy? A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Guglielmo Mantica,&nbsp;Francesco Chierigo,&nbsp;Farzana Cassim,&nbsp;Francesca Ambrosini,&nbsp;Stefano Tappero,&nbsp;Rafaela Malinaric,&nbsp;Stefano Parodi,&nbsp;Andrea Benelli,&nbsp;Federico Dotta,&nbsp;Marco Ennas,&nbsp;Martina Beverini,&nbsp;Chiara Vaccaro,&nbsp;Salvatore Smelzo,&nbsp;Giovanni Guano,&nbsp;Federico Mariano,&nbsp;Calogero Paola,&nbsp;Giorgia Granelli,&nbsp;Virginia Varca,&nbsp;Carlo Introini,&nbsp;Salvatore Dioguardi,&nbsp;Alchiede Simonato,&nbsp;Andrea Gregori,&nbsp;Franco Gaboardi,&nbsp;Carlo Terrone,&nbsp;André Van der Merwe","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S377510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate in men with chronic use of Aspirin and to compare it with the detection rate of non-users.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Prospectively maintained database regarding patients undergoing prostate biopsy over the last 10 years in five institutions. Patients were divided into two groups according to their exposure to Aspirin. We relied on multivariable linear and logistic regression models to test whether Aspirin administration was associated with lower PSA values at prostate biopsy, higher PCa diagnosis, and higher Gleason Grade Grouping (GGG) at biopsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Were identified 1059 patients, of whom 803 (76%) did not take Aspirin vs 256 (24%) were taking it. In multivariable log-linear regression analysis, Aspirin administration was associated with lower PSA levels (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, p = 0.01), after controlling for age, prostate volume, smoking history, associated inflammation at prostate biopsy, presence of PCa at biopsy, and GGG. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, Aspirin administration was not found to be a predictor of PCa at prostate biopsy (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.82-2.40, p = 0.21) after controlling for age, PSA, smoking history, prostate volume, findings at digital rectal examination and the number of biopsy cores. In patients with PCa at prostate biopsy (n = 516), Aspirin administration was found to predict higher GGG (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.01-4.87, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspirin administration was found to be a predictor of more aggressive GGG. These findings suggest that a lower PSA threshold should be considered in patients taking Aspirin, as, despite low PSA levels, they might harbour aggressive PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/d8/rru-14-369.PMC9595058.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S377510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate in men with chronic use of Aspirin and to compare it with the detection rate of non-users.

Patients and methods: Prospectively maintained database regarding patients undergoing prostate biopsy over the last 10 years in five institutions. Patients were divided into two groups according to their exposure to Aspirin. We relied on multivariable linear and logistic regression models to test whether Aspirin administration was associated with lower PSA values at prostate biopsy, higher PCa diagnosis, and higher Gleason Grade Grouping (GGG) at biopsy.

Results: Were identified 1059 patients, of whom 803 (76%) did not take Aspirin vs 256 (24%) were taking it. In multivariable log-linear regression analysis, Aspirin administration was associated with lower PSA levels (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, p = 0.01), after controlling for age, prostate volume, smoking history, associated inflammation at prostate biopsy, presence of PCa at biopsy, and GGG. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, Aspirin administration was not found to be a predictor of PCa at prostate biopsy (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.82-2.40, p = 0.21) after controlling for age, PSA, smoking history, prostate volume, findings at digital rectal examination and the number of biopsy cores. In patients with PCa at prostate biopsy (n = 516), Aspirin administration was found to predict higher GGG (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.01-4.87, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Aspirin administration was found to be a predictor of more aggressive GGG. These findings suggest that a lower PSA threshold should be considered in patients taking Aspirin, as, despite low PSA levels, they might harbour aggressive PCa.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期使用乙酰水杨酸与前列腺癌PSA筛查的相关性我们应该降低慢性治疗患者的PSA临界值吗?一项多中心研究。
目的:评价长期服用阿司匹林的男性前列腺癌(PCa)的检出率,并与未服用阿司匹林的男性前列腺癌检出率进行比较。患者和方法:前瞻性地维护了过去10年在5个机构中接受前列腺活检的患者的数据库。患者根据服用阿司匹林的程度被分为两组。我们依靠多变量线性和逻辑回归模型来检验阿司匹林是否与前列腺活检中较低的PSA值、较高的PCa诊断和较高的Gleason分级分组(GGG)相关。结果:1059例患者中,803例(76%)未服用阿司匹林,256例(24%)服用阿司匹林。在多变量对数线性回归分析中,在控制了年龄、前列腺体积、吸烟史、前列腺活检时的相关炎症、活检时是否存在前列腺癌和GGG后,阿司匹林给药与较低的PSA水平相关(OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, p = 0.01)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,在控制了年龄、PSA、吸烟史、前列腺体积、直肠指检结果和活检核数后,阿司匹林给药并不是前列腺活检中PCa的预测因子(OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.82-2.40, p = 0.21)。在前列腺活检的前列腺癌患者中(n = 516),服用阿司匹林可预测GGG升高(OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.01-4.87, p = 0.04)。结论:阿斯匹林被发现是更严重的GGG的预测因子。这些发现表明,服用阿司匹林的患者应考虑较低的PSA阈值,因为尽管PSA水平较低,但他们可能怀有侵袭性PCa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Fucoidan Ameliorates Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Rats. Bladder Pain Syndrome (BPS): A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Strategies and Management Approaches. An Evaluation of the Postvoid Residual Urine Volume in Acute Stroke Patients. General Obesity and Prostate Cancer in Relation to Abdominal Obesity and Ethnic Groups: A US Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Incidence and Recurrence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1