Newborn resuscitation simulation training and changes in clinical performance and perinatal outcomes: a clinical observational study of 10,481 births.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2022-11-05 DOI:10.1186/s41077-022-00234-z
May Sissel Vadla, Robert Moshiro, Paschal Mdoe, Joar Eilevstjønn, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Barikiel Hhando Hhoki, Hege Ersdal
{"title":"Newborn resuscitation simulation training and changes in clinical performance and perinatal outcomes: a clinical observational study of 10,481 births.","authors":"May Sissel Vadla,&nbsp;Robert Moshiro,&nbsp;Paschal Mdoe,&nbsp;Joar Eilevstjønn,&nbsp;Jan Terje Kvaløy,&nbsp;Barikiel Hhando Hhoki,&nbsp;Hege Ersdal","doi":"10.1186/s41077-022-00234-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Annually, 1.5 million intrapartum-related deaths occur; fresh stillbirths and early newborn deaths. Most of these deaths are preventable with skilled ventilation starting within the first minute of life. Helping Babies Breathe is an educational program shown to improve simulated skills in newborn resuscitation. However, translation into clinical practice remains a challenge. The aim was to describe changes in clinical resuscitation and perinatal outcomes (i.e., fresh stillbirths and 24-h newborn deaths) after introducing a novel simulator (phase 1) and then local champions (phase 2) to facilitate ongoing Helping Babies Breathe skill and scenario simulation training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 3-year prospective before/after (2 phases) clinical observational study in Tanzania. Research assistants observed all deliveries from September 2015 through August 2018 and recorded labor/newborn information and perinatal outcomes. A novel simulator with automatic feedback to stimulate self-guided skill training was introduced in September 2016. Local champions were introduced in October 2017 to motivate midwives for weekly training, also team simulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 10,481 births. Midwives had practiced self-guided skill training during the last week prior to a real newborn resuscitation in 34% of cases during baseline, 30% in phase 1, and 71% in phase 2. Most real resuscitations were provided by midwives, increasing from 66% in the baseline, to 77% in phase 1, and further to 83% in phase 2. The median time from birth to first ventilation decreased between baseline and phase 2 from 118 (85-165) to 101 (72-150) s, and time pauses during ventilation decreased from 28 to 16%. Ventilations initiated within the first minute did not change significantly (13-16%). The proportion of high-risk deliveries increased during the study period, while perinatal mortality remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reports a gradual improvement in real newborn resuscitation skills after introducing a novel simulator and then local champions. The frequency of trainings increased first after the introduction of motivating champions. Time from birth to first ventilation decreased; still, merely 16% of newborns received ventilation within the first minute as recommended. This is a remaining challenge that may require more targeted team-scenario training and quality improvement efforts to improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636744/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00234-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Annually, 1.5 million intrapartum-related deaths occur; fresh stillbirths and early newborn deaths. Most of these deaths are preventable with skilled ventilation starting within the first minute of life. Helping Babies Breathe is an educational program shown to improve simulated skills in newborn resuscitation. However, translation into clinical practice remains a challenge. The aim was to describe changes in clinical resuscitation and perinatal outcomes (i.e., fresh stillbirths and 24-h newborn deaths) after introducing a novel simulator (phase 1) and then local champions (phase 2) to facilitate ongoing Helping Babies Breathe skill and scenario simulation training.

Methods: This is a 3-year prospective before/after (2 phases) clinical observational study in Tanzania. Research assistants observed all deliveries from September 2015 through August 2018 and recorded labor/newborn information and perinatal outcomes. A novel simulator with automatic feedback to stimulate self-guided skill training was introduced in September 2016. Local champions were introduced in October 2017 to motivate midwives for weekly training, also team simulations.

Results: The study included 10,481 births. Midwives had practiced self-guided skill training during the last week prior to a real newborn resuscitation in 34% of cases during baseline, 30% in phase 1, and 71% in phase 2. Most real resuscitations were provided by midwives, increasing from 66% in the baseline, to 77% in phase 1, and further to 83% in phase 2. The median time from birth to first ventilation decreased between baseline and phase 2 from 118 (85-165) to 101 (72-150) s, and time pauses during ventilation decreased from 28 to 16%. Ventilations initiated within the first minute did not change significantly (13-16%). The proportion of high-risk deliveries increased during the study period, while perinatal mortality remained unchanged.

Conclusions: This study reports a gradual improvement in real newborn resuscitation skills after introducing a novel simulator and then local champions. The frequency of trainings increased first after the introduction of motivating champions. Time from birth to first ventilation decreased; still, merely 16% of newborns received ventilation within the first minute as recommended. This is a remaining challenge that may require more targeted team-scenario training and quality improvement efforts to improve.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿复苏模拟训练与临床表现和围产期结局的变化:10481例新生儿的临床观察研究。
背景:每年发生150万例产内相关死亡;新生死产和新生儿早期死亡。这些死亡大多可以通过在生命的第一分钟内开始熟练的通气来预防。帮助婴儿呼吸是一个教育项目,旨在提高新生儿复苏的模拟技能。然而,将其转化为临床实践仍然是一个挑战。目的是描述引入新型模拟器(第一阶段)和当地冠军(第二阶段)后临床复苏和围产期结果(即新鲜死产和24小时新生儿死亡)的变化,以促进持续的“帮助婴儿呼吸”技能和场景模拟训练。方法:这是坦桑尼亚一项为期3年的前瞻性前后(2期)临床观察研究。研究助理观察了2015年9月至2018年8月的所有分娩情况,并记录了分娩/新生儿信息和围产期结局。2016年9月推出了一款新型模拟器,该模拟器具有自动反馈功能,可刺激自主技能训练。当地冠军于2017年10月推出,以激励助产士每周进行培训,也包括团队模拟。结果:该研究包括10481名新生儿。34%的基线期病例、30%的第一阶段病例和71%的第二阶段病例在真正新生儿复苏前的最后一周进行了自我指导技能培训。大多数真正的复苏是由助产士提供的,从基线的66%增加到第一阶段的77%,在第二阶段进一步增加到83%。从出生到第一次通气的中位时间从基线和第二阶段从118(85-165)秒减少到101(72-150)秒,通气暂停时间从28%减少到16%。在第一分钟内开始的通气没有显著变化(13-16%)。在研究期间,高危分娩的比例增加,而围产期死亡率保持不变。结论:本研究报告了在引入新型模拟器和本地冠军后,真正新生儿复苏技能的逐步提高。在引入激励冠军后,训练频率首先增加。从出生到第一次通气时间缩短;尽管如此,只有16%的新生儿在建议的第一分钟内接受了通气。这是一个仍然存在的挑战,可能需要更有针对性的团队场景培训和质量改进工作来改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice. Reclaiming identities: exploring the influence of simulation on refugee doctors' workforce integration. TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training. Theoretical foundations and implications of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality for immersive learning in health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1