Waiting Time for Specialist Consultation and Visit Requested in the Emergency Department; a Cross-Sectional Study.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2019-02-20 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.136
Ehsan Hajzargarbashi, Rakhshan Rashedi, Seyedmehdi Pourafzali, Mehrdad Esmailian
{"title":"Waiting Time for Specialist Consultation and Visit Requested in the Emergency Department; a Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ehsan Hajzargarbashi,&nbsp;Rakhshan Rashedi,&nbsp;Seyedmehdi Pourafzali,&nbsp;Mehrdad Esmailian","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Waiting time in the hospital directly affects the quality of healthcare providing centers. One of the waiting times in hospital is the time spent waiting for receiving various consultations and visits requested by emergency medicine specialists from specialist services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study was designed and performed to assess the waiting times for receiving specialist visits and consultations requested in the emergency department based on the corresponding service in a referral hospital in Isfahan, Iran.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the present cross-sectional study, patients presenting to emergency department of Dr. Shariati Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from October 2017 to March 2018, who were in need of visit or consultation from other specialist services based on the opinion of the emergency medicine specialist, were studied. By attending the patients' bedside, the researcher filled out a checklist consisting of demographic data and waiting time of the patients and other probable related factors. Finally, raw data were entered to the computer and after correction of errors were statistically analyzed via SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 400 patients with the mean age of 53.3 ± 24.3 years were included in the study, 58.8% of which were male. Mean waiting time for receiving a visit or consultation among the studied patients was 242.0 ± 202.4 (min: 5 and max: 1200) minutes. Mean waiting time for a visit or consultation did not significantly correlate with the corresponding physician being resident or on-call. However, it showed a statistically significant correlation with triage level (p = 0.013), work shift (p = 0.000), type of service requested/the specialist service asked for a consultation or visit (p = 0.049), and the consultation or visit being emergent or non-emergent (p = 0.000). In addition, emergent visits or consultations by on-call physicians had been performed significantly faster than those by resident physicians; while non-emergent visits or consultations by resident physicians had been performed significantly faster than those by on-call physicians (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the present study showed that patients with triage level 2, emergent visit of consultation and a visit or consultation request in the morning or evening shift wait a shorter time for receiving the visit or consultation. In addition, neurosurgery, nephrology, and pediatrics services had the shortest waiting times, while gastroenterology, gynecology, and infectious disease services had the longest waiting times for giving the visit or consultation requested from them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/53/AJEM-3-e15.PMC6548116.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Waiting time in the hospital directly affects the quality of healthcare providing centers. One of the waiting times in hospital is the time spent waiting for receiving various consultations and visits requested by emergency medicine specialists from specialist services.

Objective: The present study was designed and performed to assess the waiting times for receiving specialist visits and consultations requested in the emergency department based on the corresponding service in a referral hospital in Isfahan, Iran.

Method: In the present cross-sectional study, patients presenting to emergency department of Dr. Shariati Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from October 2017 to March 2018, who were in need of visit or consultation from other specialist services based on the opinion of the emergency medicine specialist, were studied. By attending the patients' bedside, the researcher filled out a checklist consisting of demographic data and waiting time of the patients and other probable related factors. Finally, raw data were entered to the computer and after correction of errors were statistically analyzed via SPSS software.

Results: Overall, 400 patients with the mean age of 53.3 ± 24.3 years were included in the study, 58.8% of which were male. Mean waiting time for receiving a visit or consultation among the studied patients was 242.0 ± 202.4 (min: 5 and max: 1200) minutes. Mean waiting time for a visit or consultation did not significantly correlate with the corresponding physician being resident or on-call. However, it showed a statistically significant correlation with triage level (p = 0.013), work shift (p = 0.000), type of service requested/the specialist service asked for a consultation or visit (p = 0.049), and the consultation or visit being emergent or non-emergent (p = 0.000). In addition, emergent visits or consultations by on-call physicians had been performed significantly faster than those by resident physicians; while non-emergent visits or consultations by resident physicians had been performed significantly faster than those by on-call physicians (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that patients with triage level 2, emergent visit of consultation and a visit or consultation request in the morning or evening shift wait a shorter time for receiving the visit or consultation. In addition, neurosurgery, nephrology, and pediatrics services had the shortest waiting times, while gastroenterology, gynecology, and infectious disease services had the longest waiting times for giving the visit or consultation requested from them.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科专家会诊和求诊的等候时间横断面研究
导读:医院的候诊时间直接影响到医疗服务中心的质量。医院的等待时间之一是等待接受专科服务的急诊医学专家要求的各种咨询和访问所花费的时间。目的:本研究旨在根据伊朗伊斯法罕一家转诊医院的相应服务,评估在急诊科接受专家访问和咨询的等待时间。方法:本横断面研究以2017年10月至2018年3月在伊朗伊斯法罕Dr. Shariati医院急诊科就诊,根据急诊医学专家意见需要访问或咨询其他专科服务的患者为研究对象。通过在病人的床边,研究人员填写了一份清单,包括人口统计数据、病人的等待时间和其他可能的相关因素。最后将原始数据输入计算机,修正错误后通过SPSS软件进行统计分析。结果:共纳入400例患者,平均年龄53.3±24.3岁,男性占58.8%。研究患者接受就诊或咨询的平均等待时间为242.0±202.4分钟(最小为5分钟,最大为1200分钟)。访问或咨询的平均等待时间与相应的医生是住院医生或随叫随到的医生没有显著相关。然而,它与分诊水平(p = 0.013)、轮班(p = 0.000)、要求的服务类型/咨询或访问的专家服务(p = 0.049)、咨询或访问是紧急还是非紧急(p = 0.000)有统计学显著相关。此外,随叫随到的医生的紧急就诊或会诊速度明显快于住院医生;而住院医生的非紧急访问或会诊的执行速度明显快于随叫随到的医生(p = 0.001)。结论:本研究结果显示,分诊2级、急症就诊和有早班或晚班就诊或问诊请求的患者等待就诊或问诊的时间较短。此外,神经外科、肾脏病学和儿科服务的等待时间最短,而胃肠病学、妇科和传染病服务的等待时间最长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Ramadan on Emergency Department Patients Flow; a Cross-Sectional Study in UAE. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 7: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on a Correlation. Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach. Development and Implementation of Integrated Road Traffic Injuries Surveillance - India (IRIS-India): A Protocol. A Letter on "The Current Status of Genes and Genetic Testing in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1