A review of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor cardiovascular trials: Implications for practice.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000516
Dawn M Battise, Jacqueline L Olin
{"title":"A review of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor cardiovascular trials: Implications for practice.","authors":"Dawn M Battise,&nbsp;Jacqueline L Olin","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Previous pharmacological management recommendations focused primarily on glucose lowering. However, new data demonstrate that select glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) not only provide glucose lowering but also can reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current data regarding CV benefits of GLP1 RA and SGLT2i in select patients with T2DM and the impact on clinical guidelines so that nurse practitioners may optimize pharmacologic management of patients with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature review was conducted using the PubMed and CINAHL complete databases to identify studies with CV benefits of GLP1 RA and SGLT2i. Pivotal clinical trials were selected for review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Select GLP1 RA and SGLT2i can reduce the risk of major adverse CV events, death from CV cases, or hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) in patients with a history of, or at high risk for, CV disease.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Based on data from major CV outcomes trials, clinical guidelines recommend GLP1a or SGLT2i in select patients for glucose lowering and CV risk reduction. In addition, even in patients who have achieved glycemic goals, these agents can provide additional benefit by reducing the incidence of major CV adverse events or hospitalization for HF. Understanding the data will help nurse practitioners select the most appropriate agent for a given individual based on comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Previous pharmacological management recommendations focused primarily on glucose lowering. However, new data demonstrate that select glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) not only provide glucose lowering but also can reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current data regarding CV benefits of GLP1 RA and SGLT2i in select patients with T2DM and the impact on clinical guidelines so that nurse practitioners may optimize pharmacologic management of patients with T2DM.

Data sources: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed and CINAHL complete databases to identify studies with CV benefits of GLP1 RA and SGLT2i. Pivotal clinical trials were selected for review.

Conclusions: Select GLP1 RA and SGLT2i can reduce the risk of major adverse CV events, death from CV cases, or hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) in patients with a history of, or at high risk for, CV disease.

Implications for practice: Based on data from major CV outcomes trials, clinical guidelines recommend GLP1a or SGLT2i in select patients for glucose lowering and CV risk reduction. In addition, even in patients who have achieved glycemic goals, these agents can provide additional benefit by reducing the incidence of major CV adverse events or hospitalization for HF. Understanding the data will help nurse practitioners select the most appropriate agent for a given individual based on comorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂心血管试验综述:实践意义
背景:动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病是2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。以前的药理学管理建议主要集中在降低血糖。然而,新的数据表明,选择胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP1 RA)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)不仅可以降低血糖,还可以降低心血管(CV)疾病的风险。目的:本研究的目的是评估目前关于GLP1 RA和SGLT2i在T2DM患者中的心血管益处的数据,以及对临床指南的影响,以便护士可以优化T2DM患者的药理学管理。数据来源:使用PubMed和CINAHL完整数据库进行文献综述,以确定GLP1 RA和SGLT2i具有CV益处的研究。选择关键临床试验进行综述。结论:选择GLP1 RA和SGLT2i可以降低有CV病史或有CV疾病高风险的患者发生主要CV不良事件、CV病例死亡或因心力衰竭(HF)住院的风险。实践意义:基于主要CV结局试验的数据,临床指南推荐GLP1a或SGLT2i用于选择降糖和降低CV风险的患者。此外,即使在达到血糖目标的患者中,这些药物也可以通过减少主要心血管不良事件或心衰住院的发生率来提供额外的益处。了解这些数据将有助于护士从业者根据合并症为特定个体选择最合适的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-NURSING
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
Unregulated male sexual enhancement treatments: Perils and pitfalls for patients and providers Enhancing competency-based assessment: Implementing oral boards in nursing education Enhancing foot care education and support strategies in adults with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study The important primary care role of neonatal nurse practitioners in the neonatal intensive care unit. Bridging the education-practice gap: Changing nurse practitioner skills through education innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1