Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination.

IF 3.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING 3D printing in medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5
Matthias Kiesel, Inga Beyers, Adam Kalisz, Achim Wöckel, Anne Quenzer, Tanja Schlaiß, Christine Wulff, Joachim Diessner
{"title":"Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination.","authors":"Matthias Kiesel,&nbsp;Inga Beyers,&nbsp;Adam Kalisz,&nbsp;Achim Wöckel,&nbsp;Anne Quenzer,&nbsp;Tanja Schlaiß,&nbsp;Christine Wulff,&nbsp;Joachim Diessner","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation in the field of gynecological pelvic examination with educational purposes holds great potential. In the current manuscript we evaluate a 3D printed model of the female pelvis, which improves practical teaching of the gynecological pelvic examination for medical staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the benefit of a 3D printed model of the female pelvis (Pelvisio®) as part of a seminar (\"skills training\") for teaching gynecological examination to medical students. Each student was randomly assigned to Group A or B by picking a ticket from a box. Group A underwent the skills training without the 3D printed model. Group B experienced the same seminar with integration of the model. Both groups evaluated the seminar by answering five questions on Likert scales (1-10, 1 = \"very little\" or \"very poor\", 10 equals \"very much\" or \"very good\"). Additionally, both groups answered three multiple-choice questions concerning pelvic anatomy (Question 6 to 8). Finally, Group B evaluated the 3D printed model with ten questions (Question 9 to 18, Likert scales, 1-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two of five questions concerning the students' satisfaction with the seminar and their gained knowledge showed statistically significant better ratings in Group B (6.7 vs. 8.2 points and 8.1 vs. 8.9 points (p < 0.001 and p < 0.009). The other three questions showed no statistically significant differences between the traditional teaching setting vs. the 3D printed model (p < 0.411, p < 0.344 and p < 0.215, respectively). The overall mean score of Question 1 to 5 showed 8.4 points for Group B and 7.8 points for Group A (p < 0.001). All three multiple-choice questions, asking about female pelvic anatomy, were answered more often correctly by Group B (p < 0.001, p < 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean score from the answers to Questions 9 to 18, only answered by Group B, showed a mean of 8.6 points, indicating, that the students approved of the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented 3D printed model Pelvisio® improves the education of female pelvic anatomy and examination for medical students. Hence, training this pivotal examination can be supported by a custom designed anatomical model tailored for interactive and explorative learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9261074/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Simulation in the field of gynecological pelvic examination with educational purposes holds great potential. In the current manuscript we evaluate a 3D printed model of the female pelvis, which improves practical teaching of the gynecological pelvic examination for medical staff.

Methods: We evaluated the benefit of a 3D printed model of the female pelvis (Pelvisio®) as part of a seminar ("skills training") for teaching gynecological examination to medical students. Each student was randomly assigned to Group A or B by picking a ticket from a box. Group A underwent the skills training without the 3D printed model. Group B experienced the same seminar with integration of the model. Both groups evaluated the seminar by answering five questions on Likert scales (1-10, 1 = "very little" or "very poor", 10 equals "very much" or "very good"). Additionally, both groups answered three multiple-choice questions concerning pelvic anatomy (Question 6 to 8). Finally, Group B evaluated the 3D printed model with ten questions (Question 9 to 18, Likert scales, 1-10).

Results: Two of five questions concerning the students' satisfaction with the seminar and their gained knowledge showed statistically significant better ratings in Group B (6.7 vs. 8.2 points and 8.1 vs. 8.9 points (p < 0.001 and p < 0.009). The other three questions showed no statistically significant differences between the traditional teaching setting vs. the 3D printed model (p < 0.411, p < 0.344 and p < 0.215, respectively). The overall mean score of Question 1 to 5 showed 8.4 points for Group B and 7.8 points for Group A (p < 0.001). All three multiple-choice questions, asking about female pelvic anatomy, were answered more often correctly by Group B (p < 0.001, p < 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean score from the answers to Questions 9 to 18, only answered by Group B, showed a mean of 8.6 points, indicating, that the students approved of the model.

Conclusion: The presented 3D printed model Pelvisio® improves the education of female pelvic anatomy and examination for medical students. Hence, training this pivotal examination can be supported by a custom designed anatomical model tailored for interactive and explorative learning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估3D打印模型在妇科盆腔检查实践培训中的价值。
背景:模拟妇科盆腔检查具有很大的教育潜力。在目前的稿件中,我们评估了一个3D打印的女性骨盆模型,这提高了医务人员妇科盆腔检查的实践教学。方法:我们评估了3D打印女性骨盆模型(Pelvisio®)作为向医学生教授妇科检查的研讨会(“技能培训”)的一部分的益处。每个学生通过从盒子中取出一张票被随机分配到A组或B组。A组在没有3D打印模型的情况下进行技能培训。B组经历了同样的研讨会,并整合了该模型。两个小组都通过回答李克特量表上的五个问题来评估研讨会(1- 10,1 =“非常少”或“非常差”,10 =“非常多”或“非常好”)。此外,两组都回答了三个关于骨盆解剖的选择题(问题6至8)。最后,B组用10个问题(问题9至18,李克特量表,1-10)评估3D打印模型。结果:在5个问题中,有2个关于学生对研讨会的满意度和他们获得的知识,B组的评分有统计学意义上的提高(6.7分对8.2分,8.1分对8.9分)。(p)结论:提出的3D打印模型Pelvisio®提高了医学生对女性骨盆解剖和检查的教育。因此,训练这一关键的考试可以支持定制设计的解剖模型量身定制的互动性和探索性学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
An anthropomorphic phantom for atrial transseptal puncture simulation training. Effects of 3D ultrasonography and 3D printed images on maternal-fetal attachment and its correlation with overall smoking within pregnancy: a pilot study. Accuracy of pelvic bone segmentation for 3d printing: a study of segmentation accuracy based on anatomic landmarks to evaluate the influence of the observer. Planning for complex inferior vena cava filter retrievals: the implementation and effectiveness of 3D printed models. Comparative analysis of conventionally and additively manufactured acetabular shells from a single manufacturer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1