Could middle- and long-distance running performance of well-trained athletes be best predicted by the same aerobic parameters?

IF 2.1 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Current research in physiology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crphys.2022.06.006
Benedito Sérgio Denadai, Camila Coelho Greco
{"title":"Could middle- and long-distance running performance of well-trained athletes be best predicted by the same aerobic parameters?","authors":"Benedito Sérgio Denadai,&nbsp;Camila Coelho Greco","doi":"10.1016/j.crphys.2022.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prediction of running performance at different competitive distances is a challenge, since it can be influenced by several physiological, morphological and biomechanical factors. In experienced male runners heterogeneous for maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max), endurance running performance can be well predicted by several key parameters of aerobic fitness such as VO<sub>2</sub>max and its respective velocity (vVO<sub>2</sub>max), running economy, blood lactate response to exercise, oxygen uptake kinetics and critical velocity. However, for a homogeneous group of well-trained endurance runners, the relationship between aerobic fitness parameters and endurance running performance seems to be influenced by the duration of the race (i.e., middle vs. long). Although middle-distance and ultramarathon runners present high aerobic fitness levels, there is no accumulating evidence showing that the aerobic key parameters influence both 800-m and ultramarathon performance in homogeneous group of well-trained runners. The vVO<sub>2</sub>max seems to be the best predictor of performance for 1500 m. For 3000 m, both vVO<sub>2</sub>max and blood lactate response to exercise are the main predictors of performance. Finally, for long distance events (5000 m, 10,000 m, marathon and ultramarathon), blood lactate response seems to be main predictor of performance. The different limiting/determinants factors and/or training-induced changes in aerobic parameters can help to explain this time- or distance-dependent pattern.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72753,"journal":{"name":"Current research in physiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 265-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/bc/main.PMC9253837.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944122000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The prediction of running performance at different competitive distances is a challenge, since it can be influenced by several physiological, morphological and biomechanical factors. In experienced male runners heterogeneous for maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), endurance running performance can be well predicted by several key parameters of aerobic fitness such as VO2max and its respective velocity (vVO2max), running economy, blood lactate response to exercise, oxygen uptake kinetics and critical velocity. However, for a homogeneous group of well-trained endurance runners, the relationship between aerobic fitness parameters and endurance running performance seems to be influenced by the duration of the race (i.e., middle vs. long). Although middle-distance and ultramarathon runners present high aerobic fitness levels, there is no accumulating evidence showing that the aerobic key parameters influence both 800-m and ultramarathon performance in homogeneous group of well-trained runners. The vVO2max seems to be the best predictor of performance for 1500 m. For 3000 m, both vVO2max and blood lactate response to exercise are the main predictors of performance. Finally, for long distance events (5000 m, 10,000 m, marathon and ultramarathon), blood lactate response seems to be main predictor of performance. The different limiting/determinants factors and/or training-induced changes in aerobic parameters can help to explain this time- or distance-dependent pattern.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
训练有素的运动员的中长跑成绩是否可以用相同的有氧参数来预测?
预测不同竞技距离的跑步表现是一项挑战,因为它可能受到多种生理、形态和生物力学因素的影响。在有经验的男性最大摄氧量(VO2max)异质跑者中,有氧适能的几个关键参数,如VO2max及其相应速度(vVO2max)、跑步经济性、运动时血乳酸反应、摄氧量动力学和临界速度,可以很好地预测耐力跑的表现。然而,对于一组训练良好的耐力跑者来说,有氧适能参数与耐力跑表现之间的关系似乎受到比赛持续时间的影响(即中长)。虽然中距离和超级马拉松运动员的有氧健身水平较高,但没有证据表明有氧关键参数对训练有素的同质跑步者的800米和超级马拉松成绩都有影响。vVO2max似乎是1500m性能的最佳预测指标。对于3000米,vVO2max和血乳酸对运动的反应是表现的主要预测指标。最后,对于长距离赛事(5000米,10000米,马拉松和超级马拉松),血乳酸反应似乎是表现的主要预测指标。不同的限制/决定因素和/或训练引起的有氧参数变化可以帮助解释这种依赖于时间或距离的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
期刊最新文献
How PPAR-alpha mediated inflammation may affect the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease Functional and pathological consequences of being fast on the uptake: Protein kinase G and p38α MAPK regulation of serotonin transporters Cell-based homologous expression system for in-vitro characterization of environmental effects on transmembrane peptide transport in fish Effect of a cajuína hydroelectrolytic drink on the physical performance and hydration status of recreational runners Immediate effects of passion fruit juice supplementation on working ability and attention in healthy participants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1