[Consequences of the COVID-19 measures for wellbeing aspects of long-term care residents].

Debby L Gerritsen, Roeslan Leontjevas, Marleen Prins, Henriëtte van der Roest
{"title":"[Consequences of the COVID-19 measures for wellbeing aspects of long-term care residents].","authors":"Debby L Gerritsen,&nbsp;Roeslan Leontjevas,&nbsp;Marleen Prins,&nbsp;Henriëtte van der Roest","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the impact of COVID-19 measures on residents of long-term care institutions, two surveys were conducted in the spring of 2020. Leontjevas et al. (study 1) inventoried practitioners' opinions, Van der Roest et al. (study 2) opinions of care workers, family, and residents without severe cognitive impairments. This article describes the combined results on social interaction and loneliness, challenging behaviour and mood, and lessons learned. In study 1, an online survey distributed to nursing home psychologists, they were asked to complete it anonymously and share the link with their fellow elderly care physicians and nurse specialists. 16 participants were then interviewed via video calling. In study 2, three hundred and fifty-seven care organizations were invited to recruit residents without severe cognitive impairments, family members and care workers for participating in a digital, anonymous survey (Study 2). The completed surveys of 323 practitioners (study 1) and 193 residents, 1609 family members and 811 employees (study 2) were included in the analyses. Social contacts of residents had changed in frequency and form compared to before the COVID-measures. Many residents experienced some loneliness during the visit ban, especially residents without cognitive impairments. There were both an increase and a decrease in challenging behaviour and affect. Several strategies used to reduce the effects of COVID-19 measures on well-being, were considered maintainable. Our studies confirmed a major impact of the COVID-19 measures on the wellbeing of long-term care residents, but also showed successful strategies of practitioners that can benefit future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine the impact of COVID-19 measures on residents of long-term care institutions, two surveys were conducted in the spring of 2020. Leontjevas et al. (study 1) inventoried practitioners' opinions, Van der Roest et al. (study 2) opinions of care workers, family, and residents without severe cognitive impairments. This article describes the combined results on social interaction and loneliness, challenging behaviour and mood, and lessons learned. In study 1, an online survey distributed to nursing home psychologists, they were asked to complete it anonymously and share the link with their fellow elderly care physicians and nurse specialists. 16 participants were then interviewed via video calling. In study 2, three hundred and fifty-seven care organizations were invited to recruit residents without severe cognitive impairments, family members and care workers for participating in a digital, anonymous survey (Study 2). The completed surveys of 323 practitioners (study 1) and 193 residents, 1609 family members and 811 employees (study 2) were included in the analyses. Social contacts of residents had changed in frequency and form compared to before the COVID-measures. Many residents experienced some loneliness during the visit ban, especially residents without cognitive impairments. There were both an increase and a decrease in challenging behaviour and affect. Several strategies used to reduce the effects of COVID-19 measures on well-being, were considered maintainable. Our studies confirmed a major impact of the COVID-19 measures on the wellbeing of long-term care residents, but also showed successful strategies of practitioners that can benefit future practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[COVID-19措施对长期护理居民健康方面的影响]。
为了研究COVID-19措施对长期护理机构居民的影响,我们于2020年春季进行了两次调查。Leontjevas等人(研究1)调查了从业人员的意见,Van der Roest等人(研究2)调查了无严重认知障碍的护工、家庭和住院医师的意见。这篇文章描述了社交互动和孤独,挑战行为和情绪,以及经验教训的综合结果。在研究1中,一份发给养老院心理学家的在线调查,他们被要求匿名完成,并与他们的老年护理医生和护士专家分享联系。然后通过视频电话采访了16名参与者。在研究2中,357个护理机构被邀请招募没有严重认知障碍的住院医生、家庭成员和护理人员参与一项数字匿名调查(研究2)。完成的调查包括323名从业人员(研究1)和193名住院医生、1609名家庭成员和811名员工(研究2)。与疫情防控措施实施前相比,居民社会接触的频率和形式发生了变化。许多居民在访问禁令期间感到了一些孤独,特别是没有认知障碍的居民。在挑战行为和情感方面有增加也有减少。用于减少COVID-19措施对福祉影响的若干战略被认为是可维持的。我们的研究证实了COVID-19措施对长期护理居民福祉的重大影响,但也显示了从业者的成功策略,可以使未来的实践受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ervaringen met COVID-19 maatregelen onder oudere Nederlandse thuiswonende migranten [Evaluation of an information booklet on end-of-life care in dementia: a mixed-methods study assessing the preferences of family caregivers and healthcare professionals]. Onderzoek naar kwetsbaarheid bij ouderen: waar staan we 15 jaar na het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg? [The tradeoff between an open or closed unit for residents with dementia: a qualitative study]. [Experiences, wishes and needs of patients with regard to patient participation during geriatric rehabilitation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1