Long-term oncological outcomes of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer.

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-20 DOI:10.3857/roj.2021.00927
Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul, Manida Pitak, Chonnipa Nantavithya
{"title":"Long-term oncological outcomes of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer.","authors":"Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul,&nbsp;Manida Pitak,&nbsp;Chonnipa Nantavithya","doi":"10.3857/roj.2021.00927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For patients with early breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) results in lower radiotherapy fractions. Published studies have shown that both conventional fraction with SIB (C-SIB) and hypofractionation with SIB (H-SIB) seem to be safe and feasible. In this study, we sought to compare the oncologic outcomes between C-SIB and H-SIB in early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Stage I-II breast cancer patients who received adjuvant WBI with SIB between January 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The radiation dose in the C-SIB group was 50 Gy and 65 Gy in 25 daily fractions, while in the H-SIB group, it was 43.2 Gy and 52.8 Gy in 16 daily fractions to the whole breast and tumor bed, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 188 patients, 103 in the C-SIB group and 85 in the H-SIB group, were included. With a median follow-up time of 87 months, 7-year locoregional control of C-SIB was comparable to H-SIB (95.8% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.964). The 7-year distant metastasis-free survival rates of C-SIB and H-SIB were 89.9% and 95.9% (p = 0.111), while the 7-year disease-free survival rates were 84.2% and 95.4%, respectively (p = 0.176). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant prognostic factor associated with better overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>H-SIB provided comparable locoregional control to C-SIB. With the advantage of a shorter radiotherapy course, H-SIB could be a favorable option for WBI in early-stage breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/53/roj-2021-00927.PMC9262705.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2021.00927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: For patients with early breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) results in lower radiotherapy fractions. Published studies have shown that both conventional fraction with SIB (C-SIB) and hypofractionation with SIB (H-SIB) seem to be safe and feasible. In this study, we sought to compare the oncologic outcomes between C-SIB and H-SIB in early-stage breast cancer.

Materials and methods: Stage I-II breast cancer patients who received adjuvant WBI with SIB between January 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The radiation dose in the C-SIB group was 50 Gy and 65 Gy in 25 daily fractions, while in the H-SIB group, it was 43.2 Gy and 52.8 Gy in 16 daily fractions to the whole breast and tumor bed, respectively.

Results: A total of 188 patients, 103 in the C-SIB group and 85 in the H-SIB group, were included. With a median follow-up time of 87 months, 7-year locoregional control of C-SIB was comparable to H-SIB (95.8% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.964). The 7-year distant metastasis-free survival rates of C-SIB and H-SIB were 89.9% and 95.9% (p = 0.111), while the 7-year disease-free survival rates were 84.2% and 95.4%, respectively (p = 0.176). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant prognostic factor associated with better overall survival.

Conclusion: H-SIB provided comparable locoregional control to C-SIB. With the advantage of a shorter radiotherapy course, H-SIB could be a favorable option for WBI in early-stage breast cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期乳腺癌低分割与传统分割全乳照射同时综合增强的长期肿瘤学结果
目的:对于行保乳手术的早期乳腺癌患者,辅助全乳照射(WBI)同时综合增强(SIB)可降低放疗分数。已发表的研究表明,传统的SIB分流(C-SIB)和SIB分流(H-SIB)似乎都是安全可行的。在这项研究中,我们试图比较C-SIB和H-SIB在早期乳腺癌中的肿瘤预后。材料和方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2017年12月期间接受SIB辅助WBI的I-II期乳腺癌患者。C-SIB组对整个乳房和肿瘤床的辐射剂量分别为50 Gy和65 Gy,分25个每日次;H-SIB组对整个乳房和肿瘤床的辐射剂量分别为43.2 Gy和52.8 Gy,分16个每日次。结果:共纳入188例患者,其中C-SIB组103例,H-SIB组85例。中位随访时间为87个月,7年C-SIB局部区域控制率与H-SIB相当(95.8% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.964)。C-SIB和H-SIB的7年无远处转移生存率分别为89.9%和95.9% (p = 0.111), 7年无疾病生存率分别为84.2%和95.4% (p = 0.176)。在多变量分析中,没有明显的预后因素与更好的总生存相关。结论:H-SIB与C-SIB具有相当的局部控制作用。H-SIB具有较短放疗疗程的优势,可能是早期乳腺癌WBI的有利选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents Different approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in surgery de-escalation clinical trial in breast cancer patients with pathological complete response Target movement according to cervical lymph node level in head and neck cancer and its clinical significance Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1