Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.

IF 1.6 Q3 ALLERGY Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2022-10-27 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41
Sevgi Sipahi Cimen, Sena Baykara Sayili
{"title":"Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.","authors":"Sevgi Sipahi Cimen,&nbsp;Sena Baykara Sayili","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anaphylaxis is defined as a severe, life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Healthcare professionals must recognize the symptoms, apply correct treatment immediately, and provide epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) to patients who experience anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to investigate the knowledge of healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study, which was conducted between February 2022 and March 2022, included healthcare professionals working in various hospitals in Turkey. A survey consisting of 21 questions which concerned with the demographic data, personal experience and level of knowledge about anaphylaxis was applied to healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 301 participants, comprising 160 specialist physicians (53.16%), 86 resident physicians (28.57%), 31 family physicians (10.3%), and 24 allied health personnel (7.97%). Most of the healthcare professionals (93%) chose epinephrine as the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. Two hundred ten participants (69.77%) knew the correct dose of epinephrine in the treatment of anaphylaxis, and allied healthcare professionals had least knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The participants who received anaphylaxis training and had experience with anaphylaxis had a higher knowledge about epinephrine dosing (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). Only 49.17% of the participants knew the epinephrine doses of EAIs, and only 19% of participants had prescribed an EAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that healthcare professionals' knowledge about epinephrine doses in the treatment of anaphylaxis was not sufficient. Furthermore, the prescribing rate of EAIs was still inadequate. There is a need for national training programs to increase and update the knowledge of healthcare professionals to reduce anaphylaxis mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"12 4","pages":"e41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/3e/apa-12-e41.PMC9669473.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Anaphylaxis is defined as a severe, life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Healthcare professionals must recognize the symptoms, apply correct treatment immediately, and provide epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) to patients who experience anaphylaxis.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the knowledge of healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.

Methods: This cross-sectional study, which was conducted between February 2022 and March 2022, included healthcare professionals working in various hospitals in Turkey. A survey consisting of 21 questions which concerned with the demographic data, personal experience and level of knowledge about anaphylaxis was applied to healthcare professionals.

Results: The study included a total of 301 participants, comprising 160 specialist physicians (53.16%), 86 resident physicians (28.57%), 31 family physicians (10.3%), and 24 allied health personnel (7.97%). Most of the healthcare professionals (93%) chose epinephrine as the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. Two hundred ten participants (69.77%) knew the correct dose of epinephrine in the treatment of anaphylaxis, and allied healthcare professionals had least knowledge (p = 0.009). The participants who received anaphylaxis training and had experience with anaphylaxis had a higher knowledge about epinephrine dosing (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Only 49.17% of the participants knew the epinephrine doses of EAIs, and only 19% of participants had prescribed an EAI.

Conclusion: Our results showed that healthcare professionals' knowledge about epinephrine doses in the treatment of anaphylaxis was not sufficient. Furthermore, the prescribing rate of EAIs was still inadequate. There is a need for national training programs to increase and update the knowledge of healthcare professionals to reduce anaphylaxis mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员关于过敏反应的知识水平。
背景:过敏反应被定义为一种严重的、危及生命的全身超敏反应。医疗保健专业人员必须识别症状,立即进行正确的治疗,并为经历过敏反应的患者提供肾上腺素自动注射器(EAI)。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在调查医护人员对过敏反应的认识。方法:这项横断面研究于2022年2月至2022年3月期间进行,包括在土耳其各医院工作的医疗保健专业人员。对医疗保健专业人员进行了一项包括人口统计数据、个人经验和过敏反应知识水平等21个问题的调查。结果:共纳入301名研究对象,其中专科医生160名(53.16%),住院医师86名(28.57%),家庭医生31名(10.3%),专职卫生人员24名(7.97%)。大多数医疗保健专业人员(93%)选择肾上腺素作为过敏反应的一线治疗。210名参与者(69.77%)知道肾上腺素治疗过敏反应的正确剂量,而相关医护人员的知识最少(p = 0.009)。接受过过敏反应培训和有过敏反应经验的参与者对肾上腺素剂量有更高的了解(分别p < 0.001和p = 0.003)。只有49.17%的参与者知道EAI的肾上腺素剂量,只有19%的参与者开过EAI处方。结论:我们的研究结果显示医护人员对肾上腺素剂量治疗过敏反应的认识不足。此外,eai的处方率仍然不足。有必要进行国家培训计划,以增加和更新卫生保健专业人员的知识,以降低过敏反应死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
期刊最新文献
Anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody (CM310) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CROWNS-2): Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) suspected triggered by lipid transfer protein in a Chinese child: A case report. From tumor to tolerance: A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse events. New-onset autoimmune thyroid disease following COVID-19. Identification of cross-reactive IgE-binding proteins from Philippine allergenic grass pollen extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1