The impact of government- and institution-implemented COVID-19 control measures on tertiary- and regional-level intensive care units in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.

K Rangai, A Ramkillawan, M T D Smith
{"title":"The impact of government- and institution-implemented COVID-19 control measures on tertiary- and regional-level intensive care units in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.","authors":"K Rangai,&nbsp;A Ramkillawan,&nbsp;M T D Smith","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems globally as most countries were not equipped to deal with the outbreak. To avoid complete collapse of intensive care units (ICUs) and health systems as a whole, containment measures had to be instituted. In South Africa (SA), the biggest intervention was the government-regulated national lockdown instituted in March 2020.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of the implemented lockdown and institutional guidelines on the admission rate and profile of non-COVID-19 patients in a regional and tertiary level ICU in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all non-COVID-19 admissions to Harry Gwala and Greys hospitals was performed over an 8-month period (1 December 2019 - 31 July 2020), which included 4 months prior to lockdown implementation and 4 months post lockdown.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 678 non-COVID-19 admissions over the 8-month period. The majority of the admissions were at Greys Hospital (52.4%; n=355) and the rest at Harry Gwala Hospital (47.6%; n=323). A change in spectrum of patients admitted was noted, with a significant decrease in trauma and burns admissions post lockdown implementation (from 34.2 - 24.6%; p=0.006). Conversely, there was a notable increase in non-COVID-19 medical admissions after lockdown regulations were implemented (20.1 - 31.3%; p<0.001). We hypothesised that this was due to the gap left by trauma patients in an already overburdened system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the implementation of a national lockdown and multiple institutional directives, there was no significant decrease in the total number of non-COVID-19 admissions to ICUs. There was, however, a notable change in spectrum of patients admitted, which may reflect a bias towards trauma admissions in the pre COVID-19 era.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>We describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care services in a resource-limited setting. We also demonstrate the ongoing need for intensive care unit beds within the public sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/ae/SAJCC-38-1-515.PMC9252134.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i1.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems globally as most countries were not equipped to deal with the outbreak. To avoid complete collapse of intensive care units (ICUs) and health systems as a whole, containment measures had to be instituted. In South Africa (SA), the biggest intervention was the government-regulated national lockdown instituted in March 2020.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of the implemented lockdown and institutional guidelines on the admission rate and profile of non-COVID-19 patients in a regional and tertiary level ICU in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Province, SA.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all non-COVID-19 admissions to Harry Gwala and Greys hospitals was performed over an 8-month period (1 December 2019 - 31 July 2020), which included 4 months prior to lockdown implementation and 4 months post lockdown.

Results: There were a total of 678 non-COVID-19 admissions over the 8-month period. The majority of the admissions were at Greys Hospital (52.4%; n=355) and the rest at Harry Gwala Hospital (47.6%; n=323). A change in spectrum of patients admitted was noted, with a significant decrease in trauma and burns admissions post lockdown implementation (from 34.2 - 24.6%; p=0.006). Conversely, there was a notable increase in non-COVID-19 medical admissions after lockdown regulations were implemented (20.1 - 31.3%; p<0.001). We hypothesised that this was due to the gap left by trauma patients in an already overburdened system.

Conclusion: Despite the implementation of a national lockdown and multiple institutional directives, there was no significant decrease in the total number of non-COVID-19 admissions to ICUs. There was, however, a notable change in spectrum of patients admitted, which may reflect a bias towards trauma admissions in the pre COVID-19 era.

Contributions of the study: We describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care services in a resource-limited setting. We also demonstrate the ongoing need for intensive care unit beds within the public sector.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府和机构实施的COVID-19控制措施对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省彼得马里茨堡三级和区域重症监护病房的影响。
背景:COVID-19大流行对全球卫生保健系统产生了重大影响,因为大多数国家没有应对疫情的能力。为了避免重症监护病房和整个卫生系统的彻底崩溃,必须制定遏制措施。在南非,最大的干预措施是2020年3月由政府监管的全国封锁。目的:评估实施的封锁和机构指南对南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省彼得马里茨堡地区和三级ICU非covid -19患者入院率和概况的影响。方法:回顾性分析Harry Gwala和Greys医院在8个月内(2019年12月1日至2020年7月31日)的所有非covid -19入院患者,其中包括封锁实施前的4个月和封锁后的4个月。结果:8个月期间共有678例非covid -19入院。大多数住院患者在格雷斯医院(52.4%);n=355),其余在Harry Gwala医院(47.6%;n = 323)。入院患者的频谱发生了变化,在实施封锁后,入院的创伤和烧伤患者显著减少(从34.2降至24.6%;p = 0.006)。相反,在实施封城规定后,非covid -19住院人数显著增加(20.1%至31.3%;结论:尽管实施了全国封锁和多项机构指令,但非covid -19重症监护病房入院总数未显着下降。然而,入院患者的范围发生了显着变化,这可能反映了在COVID-19前时代对创伤入院的偏见。研究贡献:我们描述了COVID-19大流行对资源有限环境下重症监护服务的影响。我们还展示了公共部门对重症监护病房床位的持续需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing knowledge translation into critical care practice: The reality facing intensive care nurses in Limpopo Province. Bed occupancy and nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit: A retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital. Critical care nurses' orientations to caring for patients and their families at a selected hospital in KwaZulu-Natal. Physical function measures in ICU survivors, where to now? A scoping review. Primary cutaneous melioidosis - A rare case needing intensive care unit admission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1