Is there frequency-specificity in the motor control of walking? The putative differential role of alpha and beta oscillations.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-10-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2022.922841
Charalambos C Charalambous, Avgis Hadjipapas
{"title":"Is there frequency-specificity in the motor control of walking? The putative differential role of alpha and beta oscillations.","authors":"Charalambos C Charalambous,&nbsp;Avgis Hadjipapas","doi":"10.3389/fnsys.2022.922841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alpha and beta oscillations have been assessed thoroughly during walking due to their potential role as proxies of the corticoreticulospinal tract (CReST) and corticospinal tract (CST), respectively. Given that damage to a descending tract after stroke can cause walking deficits, detailed knowledge of how these oscillations mechanistically contribute to walking could be utilized in strategies for post-stroke locomotor recovery. In this review, the goal was to summarize, synthesize, and discuss the existing evidence on the potential differential role of these oscillations on the motor descending drive, the effect of transcranial alternate current stimulation (tACS) on neurotypical and post-stroke walking, and to discuss remaining gaps in knowledge, future directions, and methodological considerations. Electrophysiological studies of corticomuscular, intermuscular, and intramuscular coherence during walking clearly demonstrate that beta oscillations are predominantly present in the dorsiflexors during the swing phase and may be absent post-stroke. The role of alpha oscillations, however, has not been pinpointed as clearly. We concluded that both animal and human studies should focus on the electrophysiological characterization of alpha oscillations and their potential role to the CReST. Another approach in elucidating the role of these oscillations is to modulate them and then quantify the impact on walking behavior. This is possible through tACS, whose beneficial effect on walking behavior (including boosting of beta oscillations in intramuscular coherence) has been recently demonstrated in both neurotypical adults and stroke patients. However, these studies still do not allow for specific roles of alpha and beta oscillations to be delineated because the tACS frequency used was much lower (i.e., individualized calculated gait frequency was used). Thus, we identify a main gap in the literature, which is tACS studies actually stimulating at alpha and beta frequencies during walking. Overall, we conclude that for beta oscillations there is a clear connection to descending drive in the corticospinal tract. The precise relationship between alpha oscillations and CReST remains elusive due to the gaps in the literature identified here. However, better understanding the role of alpha (and beta) oscillations in the motor control of walking can be used to progress and develop rehabilitation strategies for promoting locomotor recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12649,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9650482/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.922841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Alpha and beta oscillations have been assessed thoroughly during walking due to their potential role as proxies of the corticoreticulospinal tract (CReST) and corticospinal tract (CST), respectively. Given that damage to a descending tract after stroke can cause walking deficits, detailed knowledge of how these oscillations mechanistically contribute to walking could be utilized in strategies for post-stroke locomotor recovery. In this review, the goal was to summarize, synthesize, and discuss the existing evidence on the potential differential role of these oscillations on the motor descending drive, the effect of transcranial alternate current stimulation (tACS) on neurotypical and post-stroke walking, and to discuss remaining gaps in knowledge, future directions, and methodological considerations. Electrophysiological studies of corticomuscular, intermuscular, and intramuscular coherence during walking clearly demonstrate that beta oscillations are predominantly present in the dorsiflexors during the swing phase and may be absent post-stroke. The role of alpha oscillations, however, has not been pinpointed as clearly. We concluded that both animal and human studies should focus on the electrophysiological characterization of alpha oscillations and their potential role to the CReST. Another approach in elucidating the role of these oscillations is to modulate them and then quantify the impact on walking behavior. This is possible through tACS, whose beneficial effect on walking behavior (including boosting of beta oscillations in intramuscular coherence) has been recently demonstrated in both neurotypical adults and stroke patients. However, these studies still do not allow for specific roles of alpha and beta oscillations to be delineated because the tACS frequency used was much lower (i.e., individualized calculated gait frequency was used). Thus, we identify a main gap in the literature, which is tACS studies actually stimulating at alpha and beta frequencies during walking. Overall, we conclude that for beta oscillations there is a clear connection to descending drive in the corticospinal tract. The precise relationship between alpha oscillations and CReST remains elusive due to the gaps in the literature identified here. However, better understanding the role of alpha (and beta) oscillations in the motor control of walking can be used to progress and develop rehabilitation strategies for promoting locomotor recovery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行走的运动控制是否具有频率特异性?α和β振荡的假定差异作用。
由于α和β振荡分别作为皮质网状脊髓束(CReST)和皮质脊髓束(CST)的潜在替代物,因此在行走过程中对其进行了全面评估。鉴于中风后下行道的损伤会导致行走障碍,详细了解这些振荡如何在机械上促进行走可以用于中风后运动恢复的策略。在这篇综述中,目的是总结、综合和讨论关于这些振荡对运动下降驱动的潜在差异作用的现有证据,经颅交流刺激(tACS)对神经正常和卒中后步行的影响,并讨论知识、未来方向和方法考虑方面的剩余空白。行走过程中皮质肌、肌间和肌内连贯性的电生理研究清楚地表明,β振荡主要存在于摆动期的背屈中,可能在卒中后不存在。然而,阿尔法振荡的作用还没有被明确指出。我们得出的结论是,动物和人类研究都应该关注α振荡的电生理特征及其对CReST的潜在作用。阐明这些振荡作用的另一种方法是调节它们,然后量化对行走行为的影响。这是通过tACS实现的,它对行走行为的有益影响(包括增强肌肉内连贯性的β振荡)最近已在神经正常成年人和中风患者中得到证实。然而,这些研究仍然不允许描述α和β振荡的具体作用,因为所使用的tACS频率要低得多(即,使用了个性化计算的步态频率)。因此,我们发现了文献中的一个主要空白,即tACS研究在行走过程中实际刺激了α和β频率。总的来说,我们得出的结论是,β振荡与皮质脊髓束的下行驱动有着明显的联系。由于文献中的空白,α振荡和CReST之间的精确关系仍然难以捉摸。然而,更好地了解α(和β)振荡在步行运动控制中的作用,可以用来推进和制定促进运动恢复的康复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
144
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of whole systems of the brain, including those involved in sensation, movement, learning and memory, attention, reward, decision-making, reasoning, executive functions, and emotions.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: The cerebellum and fear extinction: evidence from rodent and human studies. Asymmetry and rehabilitation of the subjective visual vertical in unilateral vestibular hypofunction patients Brain-consistent architecture for imagination. Corrigendum: Neurocognitive and cerebellar function in ADHD, autism and spinocerebellar ataxia. Occlusal effects on text reading: an eye-tracker study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1