Building resilient supply chains in uncertain times: a comparative study of EU and ASEAN approaches to supply chain resilience

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s10308-022-00652-8
Angela Pennisi di Floristella, Xuechen Chen
{"title":"Building resilient supply chains in uncertain times: a comparative study of EU and ASEAN approaches to supply chain resilience","authors":"Angela Pennisi di Floristella,&nbsp;Xuechen Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10308-022-00652-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Amid rising uncertainty in the global economy and unprecedented economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of supply chain resilience has gained increasing popularity in ASEAN and the EU. However, by comparing their paths to resilient supply chains, this article argues that while both organizations regard resilience as a departure from past doctrines of pure economic efficiency, each has a different understanding of and approach to supply chain resilience. While for ASEAN, supply chain resilience is meant to reconcile inward- and outward-looking dimensions to support ASEAN competitiveness, within the EU, resilience is associated with the search for strategic autonomy with an internal focus. Despite these differences, both groups regard sustainability and digital transformation as crucial components of supply chain resilience, which they see as a way to enhance their economic cooperation and strategic partnership.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"457 - 475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-022-00652-8.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-022-00652-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Amid rising uncertainty in the global economy and unprecedented economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of supply chain resilience has gained increasing popularity in ASEAN and the EU. However, by comparing their paths to resilient supply chains, this article argues that while both organizations regard resilience as a departure from past doctrines of pure economic efficiency, each has a different understanding of and approach to supply chain resilience. While for ASEAN, supply chain resilience is meant to reconcile inward- and outward-looking dimensions to support ASEAN competitiveness, within the EU, resilience is associated with the search for strategic autonomy with an internal focus. Despite these differences, both groups regard sustainability and digital transformation as crucial components of supply chain resilience, which they see as a way to enhance their economic cooperation and strategic partnership.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不确定时期建立弹性供应链:欧盟和东盟供应链弹性方法的比较研究
在全球经济不确定性上升、新冠肺炎疫情对经济造成前所未有破坏的背景下,供应链韧性概念在东盟和欧盟越来越受欢迎。然而,通过比较他们弹性供应链的路径,本文认为,虽然两个组织都认为弹性是对过去纯经济效率理论的背离,但每个组织对供应链弹性都有不同的理解和方法。对于东盟而言,供应链弹性意味着协调内向和外向的维度,以支持东盟的竞争力,而在欧盟内部,弹性与寻求内部重点的战略自治有关。尽管存在这些差异,但双方都将可持续性和数字化转型视为供应链弹性的关键组成部分,并将其视为加强经济合作和战略伙伴关系的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
期刊最新文献
Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations Informing macrologistics connectivity in emerging economies through a triangulated research approach: the case of Uzbekistan Correction: The regime complex for digital trade in Asia and China’s engagement Paradiplomacy and international conflict: disengagement from China by Swedish local governments International law: from fragmentation to integration? an analysis of the relationship between international trade law and international labor law in multilateral and regional trade law frameworks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1