Simon Schedler, Stella Marie Graf, Thomas Muehlbauer
{"title":"Effects of Different Balance Training Volumes on Children's Dynamic Balance.","authors":"Simon Schedler, Stella Marie Graf, Thomas Muehlbauer","doi":"10.1055/a-1811-1145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerning balance training, the most effective design of several load dimensions (e. g., training frequency, volume) is unclear. Thus, we determined the effects of different balance training volumes on dynamic balance in healthy children. Three groups of 20 children (age: 11.0±0.7 years; 47% females) were randomly assigned to a balance training group using a low or a high training volume or an active control group that performed regular physical education lessons. All groups trained for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week), whereby balance training volume amounted to 4 min/session and 18-24 min/session for the low- and high-volume group, respectively. Pre- and post-training, balance performance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and the Timed-Up-and-Go Test. Fifty-five children completed the study and significant Test x Group interactions were detected for both outcome measures in favor of the two balance training groups. Additionally, improvements in the high-volume group were significantly larger for some measures (Y-balance test anterior reach distance: <i>p</i> <.001, <i>d</i> =.94; Timed-Up-and-Go time: <i>p</i> =.003, <i>d</i> =.81) compared to the low-volume group. The results indicate that balance training is effective to improve balance performance in healthy children and it seems that a 36-48 min/week compared to an 8 min/week training volume provides additional effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":" ","pages":"E32-E38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/ea/10-1055-a-1811-1145.PMC9276332.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1811-1145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Concerning balance training, the most effective design of several load dimensions (e. g., training frequency, volume) is unclear. Thus, we determined the effects of different balance training volumes on dynamic balance in healthy children. Three groups of 20 children (age: 11.0±0.7 years; 47% females) were randomly assigned to a balance training group using a low or a high training volume or an active control group that performed regular physical education lessons. All groups trained for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week), whereby balance training volume amounted to 4 min/session and 18-24 min/session for the low- and high-volume group, respectively. Pre- and post-training, balance performance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and the Timed-Up-and-Go Test. Fifty-five children completed the study and significant Test x Group interactions were detected for both outcome measures in favor of the two balance training groups. Additionally, improvements in the high-volume group were significantly larger for some measures (Y-balance test anterior reach distance: p <.001, d =.94; Timed-Up-and-Go time: p =.003, d =.81) compared to the low-volume group. The results indicate that balance training is effective to improve balance performance in healthy children and it seems that a 36-48 min/week compared to an 8 min/week training volume provides additional effects.
对于平衡训练,最有效的设计是几种载荷尺寸(例如:(训练频率、数量)尚不清楚。因此,我们确定了不同的平衡训练量对健康儿童动态平衡的影响。3组20例(年龄:11.0±0.7岁;47%的女性)被随机分配到使用低或高训练量的平衡训练组或进行常规体育课程的积极对照组。所有组都训练了8周(2次/周),其中平衡训练量为4分钟/次,低量组和高量组分别为18-24分钟/次。在训练前和训练后,平衡性表现采用下季y -平衡测试和计时起跑测试进行评估。55名儿童完成了研究,在两个结果测量中检测到显著的测试x组相互作用,有利于两个平衡训练组。此外,在一些测量中,高容积组的改善明显更大(y -平衡测试前到达距离:p d = 0.94;定时启动时间:p =。003, d =.81)。结果表明,平衡训练对改善健康儿童的平衡能力是有效的,似乎36-48分钟/周的训练量比8分钟/周的训练量提供了额外的效果。