Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2022.04.004
Rawish Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Munjal, Anuradha Sharma, Md Noorain Alam, Naresh K. Panda
{"title":"Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry","authors":"Rawish Kumar,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar Munjal,&nbsp;Anuradha Sharma,&nbsp;Md Noorain Alam,&nbsp;Naresh K. Panda","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2022.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective was to measure the effect of various face masks on speech recognition threshold and the word recognition score in the presence of varying background noise levels. 20 normal-hearing adult subjects (a total of 40 ears) participated. Pure tone audiometry followed by speech recognition threshold and word recognition score at the most comfortable level in varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR0, SNR10, and SNR15) using surgical, pleated cloth, and N95 masks. Using surgical, cloth, and N95 masks, speech recognition thresholds increased by 1.8 dB, 4.4 dB, and 5.05 dB, respectively. Word recognition scores decreased by 32% without a mask, 43.7% in a surgical mask, 46.3% in a cloth mask, and 46.7% in N95 mask conditions, between SNR15 and SNR0. The speech recognition threshold was negatively affected with cloth and N95 masks. Surgical masks do not affect the word recognition scores at lower background noise levels. However, as the signal-to-noise ratio decreased, even the surgical, cloth, and N95 masks significantly impacted the word recognition score even in normal-hearing individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 140-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/07/main.PMC9270560.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293022000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The objective was to measure the effect of various face masks on speech recognition threshold and the word recognition score in the presence of varying background noise levels. 20 normal-hearing adult subjects (a total of 40 ears) participated. Pure tone audiometry followed by speech recognition threshold and word recognition score at the most comfortable level in varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR0, SNR10, and SNR15) using surgical, pleated cloth, and N95 masks. Using surgical, cloth, and N95 masks, speech recognition thresholds increased by 1.8 dB, 4.4 dB, and 5.05 dB, respectively. Word recognition scores decreased by 32% without a mask, 43.7% in a surgical mask, 46.3% in a cloth mask, and 46.7% in N95 mask conditions, between SNR15 and SNR0. The speech recognition threshold was negatively affected with cloth and N95 masks. Surgical masks do not affect the word recognition scores at lower background noise levels. However, as the signal-to-noise ratio decreased, even the surgical, cloth, and N95 masks significantly impacted the word recognition score even in normal-hearing individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面罩对言语理解的影响:语音测听的临床观察
目的是测量在不同背景噪声水平下,不同口罩对语音识别阈值和单词识别分数的影响。20名听力正常的成人受试者(共40只耳)参与试验。使用外科手术、褶皱布和N95口罩,在不同信噪比(SNR0、SNR10和SNR15)下进行纯音测听,然后进行语音识别阈值和单词识别分数的最舒适水平。使用外科口罩、布口罩和N95口罩,语音识别阈值分别提高了1.8 dB、4.4 dB和5.05 dB。在SNR15和SNR0之间,不戴口罩的单词识别分数下降了32%,戴外科口罩的下降了43.7%,戴布口罩的下降了46.3%,戴N95口罩的下降了46.7%。布和N95口罩对语音识别阈值有负面影响。在较低的背景噪音水平下,外科口罩不会影响单词识别分数。然而,随着信噪比的降低,即使是外科口罩、布口罩和N95口罩也会显著影响听力正常的人的单词识别得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Post-operative venous thromboembolism in patients after extracranial otologic surgery: A case series Enriched Acoustic Environment as a customized treatment for tinnitus: A non-controlled longitudinal study Establishment of quantitative evaluation system for cochlear implant effectiveness for hearing-impaired children Current trends and hotspots of etiology of auditory neuropathy in the past 30 years: A bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1