A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study to Evaluate the Immediate Effect of Targeted Exercise Therapy on Cancer-Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors: The FatiGO Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-18 DOI:10.1159/000525705
Stefanie Siebert, Anne Kollikowski, Carrie-Ann Minto, Franziska Byrtus, Jennifer Lesnik, Joachim Weis, Markus Horneber, Wilhelm Bloch, Freerk Theeagnus Baumann, Jannike Salchow
{"title":"A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study to Evaluate the Immediate Effect of Targeted Exercise Therapy on Cancer-Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors: The FatiGO Study.","authors":"Stefanie Siebert, Anne Kollikowski, Carrie-Ann Minto, Franziska Byrtus, Jennifer Lesnik, Joachim Weis, Markus Horneber, Wilhelm Bloch, Freerk Theeagnus Baumann, Jannike Salchow","doi":"10.1159/000525705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a clinically relevant side effect that impairs cancer survivors after treatment cessation. Exercise interventions have proven effective; however, specific exercise modalities remain untested. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of daily fatigue screenings and to show the impact of various exercise interventions on CRF. Methods: The randomized controlled pilot study ran for 4 weeks with 3 training sessions per week, in 5 groups: endurance versus strength (moderate- and vigorous-intensity levels for each) compared to a non-active control group. The primary outcome was feasibility; more specifically, it was evaluated whether the documentation with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a daily basis and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) on a weekly basis are usable assessments to generate information about CRF. Results: Over the course of the 4-week intervention, 8.3% of the participants (n = 3) dropped out. Thirty-three of the initial 36 participants completed the exercise sessions with an adherence of 95%. Measurements of daily fatigue were collected three times per day, 85% of which were completely filled out. In regard to weekly fatigue, all but one of the questionnaires were submitted (99.5%). Neither during the intervention nor during the tests did any serious adverse events occur within the FatiGO study; hence, the exercise intervention is considered to be feasible for participants. Conclusions: This pilot study showed the feasibility of close-meshed daily fatigue screening. Preliminary data indicate that cancer survivors are able to train in high-intensity ranges with tendencies toward decreased fatigue. Therefore, practicability of the study design is shown. Further results are expected within the prospective multicenter trial.","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"639-649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a clinically relevant side effect that impairs cancer survivors after treatment cessation. Exercise interventions have proven effective; however, specific exercise modalities remain untested. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of daily fatigue screenings and to show the impact of various exercise interventions on CRF. Methods: The randomized controlled pilot study ran for 4 weeks with 3 training sessions per week, in 5 groups: endurance versus strength (moderate- and vigorous-intensity levels for each) compared to a non-active control group. The primary outcome was feasibility; more specifically, it was evaluated whether the documentation with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a daily basis and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) on a weekly basis are usable assessments to generate information about CRF. Results: Over the course of the 4-week intervention, 8.3% of the participants (n = 3) dropped out. Thirty-three of the initial 36 participants completed the exercise sessions with an adherence of 95%. Measurements of daily fatigue were collected three times per day, 85% of which were completely filled out. In regard to weekly fatigue, all but one of the questionnaires were submitted (99.5%). Neither during the intervention nor during the tests did any serious adverse events occur within the FatiGO study; hence, the exercise intervention is considered to be feasible for participants. Conclusions: This pilot study showed the feasibility of close-meshed daily fatigue screening. Preliminary data indicate that cancer survivors are able to train in high-intensity ranges with tendencies toward decreased fatigue. Therefore, practicability of the study design is shown. Further results are expected within the prospective multicenter trial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估靶向运动治疗对癌症幸存者癌症相关疲劳的即时效果的随机、对照先导研究:FatiGO研究
癌症相关疲劳(CRF)是一种临床相关的副作用,在治疗停止后损害癌症幸存者。运动干预已被证明是有效的;然而,具体的锻炼方式仍未经测试。本研究的目的是评估每日疲劳筛查的可行性,并显示各种运动干预对CRF的影响。方法:随机对照先导研究为期4周,每周3次训练,分为5组:耐力组与力量组(每组均为中等强度和高强度水平),与非运动对照组相比。主要结果是可行性;更具体地说,评估了每天使用的数值评定量表(NRS)和每周使用的多维疲劳量表(MFI)的文件是否可用于生成有关CRF的信息。结果:在为期4周的干预过程中,8.3%的参与者(n = 3)退出。最初的36名参与者中有33人完成了锻炼,坚持率达到95%。每天收集三次每日疲劳测量数据,其中85%已完全填写完毕。关于每周疲劳程度,除一份问卷外,其余问卷均已提交(99.5%)。在干预和测试期间,在FatiGO研究中没有发生任何严重的不良事件;因此,运动干预被认为是可行的。结论:该初步研究显示了闭合网格日常疲劳筛选的可行性。初步数据表明,癌症幸存者能够在高强度范围内进行训练,并有减少疲劳的趋势。由此可见本研究设计的实用性。进一步的结果有望在前瞻性多中心试验中得到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
期刊最新文献
What is new in the German S3 guideline on gastric cancer: diagnosis, staging and treatment. Moving tumor-agnostic therapy to the big stage - translational and molecular oncology highlights from the ESMO Congress 2025. Apatinib mesylate in the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Vulnerability to infections and secondary immunodeficiencies in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas starting anti-CD20 antibody containing therapies. KRAS Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Involvement: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1