Oncology Research and Treatment最新文献

Introduction: Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) oncology meetings foster collaboration among healthcare practitioners to determine the most appropriate course of action for cancer patient care. Defining what is 'best' for a patient is complex, involving clinical guidelines, patient needs, evidence-based practices, and available treatment options. Patient participation offers unique insights into cultural and psycho-social preferences, shifting away from the paternalistic health care model. This study aimed to explore the benefits, barriers, and challenges associated with integrating patient preferences (PPs) into oncology MDT decision making.

Methods: Thirty participants from two major UK oncology centers completed questionnaires, with eight participating in the follow-up interviews.

Results: The key benefits of incorporating patient preferences included improved patient satisfaction, treatment adherence, and decision-making efficiency. The major barriers were lack of clinical information, insufficient knowledge of preferences, and time constraints. Challenges within MDT meetings include poor attendance of key clinicians, inadequate chairing, and physical constraints.

Conclusion: This is the first UK-based study to explore physicians' perspectives on incorporating patient preferences into oncology decision-making. While patient preferences are valued, integration is often hindered by systemic pressure within the NHS. The findings highlight the complex interplay between patient-centered care ideals and practical implementation challenges, suggesting areas for improvement that incorporate patient voices into cancer care decision-making.

Introduction: The impact of being diagnosed with a life-threatening illness may influence preferences to participate in treatment decisions. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors that are associated with sarcoma patients wanting to take a more active or passive role.

Methods: Data was obtained as part of a nationwide multicenter study (PROSa) aiming to investigate the structure and quality of medical care of sarcoma patients in Germany and their determinants. The study was conducted between 2017 and 2020 in 39 study centers. For the present analysis, cross-sectional data of adult patients with sarcoma of any entity were analyzed. Control preference was measured with the control preference scale (CPS). Preferences were divided in patient-led, shared, or physician-led-decision-making. Associated factors were analyzed exploratively using multivariable multinominal logistic regression models. We included socio-economical and medical variables with stepwise backward variable selection.

Results: We included 1081 patients (48.6% female). 402 patients (37.2%) preferred to be in control about treatment decisions, while 400 patients (37.0%) favored shared responsibility. 25.8% (n = 279) wished to rather leave the control to the treating physician. Older patients were more likely to prefer shared decision-making than younger patients aged 18 to 40 years (age group: > 75 years: Odds Ratio (OR) .53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) .28; .99). Patients with a metastatic tumor desired shared decision making compared to those without metastases (metastasis: OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09; 2.38). When comparing the patients who preferred physician-led decision making with those who favored to be in control, older patients also preferred leaving the control to the physician and were less inclined to make the decisions by themselves: (18 to > 40 years vs > 75 years: OR .28, 95% CI .15; .55). With secondary school (8/9 years) as reference, patients holding a high school degree were more likely to prefer patient-led decision-making over physician-led decision making (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26; 3.09). Patients with sarcoma of the abdomen/retroperitoneum were more predisposed to taking control in treatment decisions compared to those with sarcoma of the back/spine or lower limb (back/spine: OR .18, 95% CI .06; .54, lower limb: OR .56, 95% CI .37; .85). With an income of 1250 €/month as reference, patients with a higher income were more likely to take control (> 2750€/month: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0; 3.1).

Conclusion: The findings of our study demonstrate that patients with metastatic disease are more likely to seek a joint decision, while those of higher age and lower education level are less likely to actively participate in treatment decisions. The results suggest that the impact of advanced illness may influence preferences to participate.

Introduction: Assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as means to monitor disease activity in translocation-associated tumors has become very popular in clinical practice. However, there are still few studies on its clinical application to date. Our study evaluates the clinical applicability of ctDNA as a biomarker for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with translocation-associated sarcomas.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we correlated 285 ctDNA samples from 34 patients diagnosed with translocation-associated sarcoma with the clinical course and images. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points during follow-up (median: 97 weeks, range: 7-398).

Results: We discovered a significant association between ctDNA levels and the clinical course of the disease, particularly noting differences between patients in remission or with progressive disease (p = 0.001). Furthermore, although we noted that ctDNA levels remained undetectable in a few cases of unilocular recurrence (n = 3), they were consistently higher in patients with multilocular recurrence (n = 14; p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Monitoring ctDNA levels provides highly specific, additional information enabling early recurrence detection in patients with translocation-associated sarcomas during the follow-up and can be integrated into clinical practice. However, MRD monitoring by ctDNA quantification alone does not allow the reliably detection of 100% of unilocular recurrences and should be complemented by the use of conventional imaging techniques.

Introduction: The study evaluates the performance of large language model versions of ChatGPT - ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and ChatGPT-Omni - in addressing inquiries related to the diagnosis and treatment of gynecological cancers, including ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers.

Methods: A total of 804 questions were equally distributed across four categories: true/false, multiple-choice, open-ended, and case-scenario, with each question type representing varying levels of complexity. Performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, focusing on accuracy, completeness, and alignment with established clinical guidelines.

Results: For true/false queries, ChatGPT-Omni achieved accuracy rates of 100% for easy, 98% for medium, and 97% for complicated questions, higher than ChatGPT-4 (94%, 90%, 85%) and ChatGPT-3.5 (90%, 85%, 80%) (p = 0.041, 0.023, 0.014, respectively). In multiple-choice, ChatGPT-Omni maintained superior accuracy with 100% for easy, 98% for medium, and 93% for complicated queries, compared to ChatGPT-4 (92%, 88%, 80%) and ChatGPT-3.5 (85%, 80%, 70%) (p = 0.035, 0.028, 0.011). For open-ended questions, ChatGPT-Omni had mean Likert scores of 5.8 for easy, 5.5 for medium, and 5.2 for complex levels, outperforming ChatGPT-4 (5.4, 5.0, 4.5) and ChatGPT-3.5 (5.0, 4.5, 4.0) (p = 0.037, 0.026, 0.015). Similar trends were observed in case-scenario questions, where ChatGPT-Omni achieved scores of 5.6, 5.3, and 4.9 for easy, medium, and hard levels, respectively (p = 0.017, 0.008, 0.012).

Conclusions: ChatGPT-Omni exhibited superior performance in responding to clinical queries related to gynecological cancers, underscoring its potential utility as a decision support tool and an educational resource in clinical practice.

Introduction: Bone-only metastasis (BOM) is a distinct clinical phenomenon in which cancer cells disseminate exclusively to the bones, without involvement of other distant organs. We investigated the factors associated with the BOM state versus other states of metastasis in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis (BM) at their first relapse. The results could help tailor the screening and preventive therapy strategies for BM in breast cancer.

Methods: The study included 231 women who underwent mastectomy for primary unilateral non-metastatic breast cancer in 1997 or later and were subsequently diagnosed with BM at first relapse in 2008-2018 at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University in China. Factors such as patient age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, tumor clinicopathological characteristics, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy (ET), time to progression (TTP), and others were analyzed. ET compliance was categorized from medication adherence. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and p value.

Results: Only three (3.8%, 3/79) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients (n = 79) used anti-HER2-targeted agents in the adjuvant setting. After excluding them, the remaining 228 patients were analyzed. They had an average age of 47.3 years and median TTP 29.4 months at their first relapse. Overall, patients with BOM accounted for 26.8%. The BOM state was similarly presented in the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients (n = 182) and in the HR-negative (HR-) patients (n = 45) (28.6% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.142). However, it was significantly lower in the HER2+ patients (n = 76) than in the HER2-negative (HER2-) patients (n = 129) (13.2% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analyses showed that the BOM state was not associated with the HR+ (vs. HR-, OR 1.253, p = 0.723) and full ET compliance (vs. no/partial, OR 1.346, p = 0.545) status. Nonetheless, the BOM state was significantly associated with a lower chance in the HER2+ patients overall (OR 0.240, p = 0.008) and in the HR+ patients (OR 0.145, p = 0.005) but not in the HR- patients (OR 1.012, p = 0.991) than one in the HER2- patients. A lower chance of BOM state was also associated with TTP ≥24 months (p < 0.05). There were no other associated factors identified.

Conclusion: Differently from HR status and other clinicopathological factors, the HER2+ status is associated with a lower chance of the BOM state in breast cancer patients with first BM. Such association appears to be reflected in HR+ patients only.

Background: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a fragmented DNA that is released into the blood through necrosis, apoptosis, phagocytosis, or active secretion. cfDNA includes a subclass called circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) released from cancer cells and constitutes a varied proportion of the total cfDNA. Both cfDNA and ctDNA hold significant potential as diagnostic biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancers.

Summary: cfDNA and ctDNA are promising diagnostic biomarkers for gastrointestinal cancers with varied diagnostic values in different types of cancers. cfDNA offers higher sensitivity that makes it more suitable for screening methods and constant monitoring, particularly in integration with conventional biomarkers or in a multimarker model. On the contrary, ctDNA gives a real-time picture of tumor genetics and is more suitable for definitive diagnosis due to its specificity for tumor-associated alterations. Different types of samples and methods of detection can influence sensitivity, and the amount of cfDNA is higher in serum but plasma is used for cfDNA analysis because it contains less cellular contamination. In summary, cfDNA is more sensitive than ctDNA, although they have comparable or slightly lower specificity.

Key message: Further studies are needed to create common guidelines, minimize the cost of analysis, and perform extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the utility of circulating cfDNA and ctDNA in the vast majority of gastrointestinal cancer stages. Therefore, with the advancement in these technologies, cfDNA and ctDNA will be highly beneficial and evolve cancer diagnostics and therapy.

Background: Cancer survivorship brings numerous challenges extending beyond physical health to include psychological, social, and functional aspects that define the quality of life (QoL) of survivors. Although recognizing that diverse gender experiences lead to different ways of coping with these challenges, many clinical trials fail to account for the distinct constructs of "sex" and "gender," often conflating the two. This review highlights how gender-related aspects can manifest in core QoL domains for cancer survivors, emphasizing the importance of inclusive and effective support systems and interventions.

Summary: While interest in the impact of gender is increasing in cancer survivor research, the terms "sex" and "gender" are still often conflated in research. Gender is a social concept consisting of multiple dimensions, such as gender identity, gender roles and norms, and gender relations. Each of these dimensions can have a distinct impact on the QoL domain of cancer survivors. Research indicates that not gender identity, but gender roles, norms, and relations can significantly influence coping behaviors that, subsequently, impact QoL domains such as physical, emotional, social, and role functioning. Understanding the interplay of gender roles, norms, and their relations with other contextual social factors is crucial for developing inclusive and effective support systems and interventions for cancer survivors.

Key messages: Gender roles and norms impact important QoL domains of cancer survivors. It is important to recognize that gendered behaviors, as a result of internalized or socially desired gender roles and norms, can both help and hinder effective coping with cancer, affecting QoL.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in systemic treatment for many types of metastatic cancer, often together with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Monitoring of treatment efficacy against clinical trial benchmarks in real-world populations and subgroups such as elderly patients is necessary. Based on the results of a previous study, we evaluated age-related survival differences in a larger cohort.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 272 patients managed in a rural real-world setting, after exclusion of those who had received neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or maintenance ICI treatment. We defined four different survival categories: death within 3 months of the first ICI dose, 3-6 months survival, 6-12 months survival, and >12 months survival. All surviving patients were followed for >12 months. Actuarial overall survival was assessed too. Age was stratified in 10-year increments.

Results: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant melanoma represented the most common tumor types. Median age was 70 years. Median actuarial overall survival was 13.6 months (5-year estimate 16%). The best survival was recorded in patients 61-70 years of age. The highest rate of early death within 3 months (29%) was seen in those aged >80 years. Long-term survival was not observed in this age group, in contrast to all others.

Conclusion: Satisfactory survival was observed in this elderly patient cohort, but survival varied with tumor type and performance status. Age was not a major determinant of survival. However, the oldest patients were at higher risk of short survival.