Propofol-Ketamine vs. Propofol-Fentanyl Combinations in Patients Undergoing Closed Reduction: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2018-09-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.102
Mani Mofidi, Roghayeh Rouhi, Babak Mahshidfar, Saeed Abbasi, Peyman Hafezimoghadam, Mahdi Rezai, Davood Farsi
{"title":"Propofol-Ketamine vs. Propofol-Fentanyl Combinations in Patients Undergoing Closed Reduction: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mani Mofidi,&nbsp;Roghayeh Rouhi,&nbsp;Babak Mahshidfar,&nbsp;Saeed Abbasi,&nbsp;Peyman Hafezimoghadam,&nbsp;Mahdi Rezai,&nbsp;Davood Farsi","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Painful surgical procedures require adequate sedation and analgesia. A vast array of medications can be used for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) in Emergency Departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study was conducted to compare Propofol-Ketamine (PK) and Propofol-Fentanyl (PF) compounds in patients undergoing closed reduction in EDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted on 110 consecutive patients who required sedation for closed reduction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of equal sizes. The PK group received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg of propofol plus 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine, and the PF group received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg of propofol plus 1 µg/kg of fentanyl. The analgesic effect and success rate were the primary outcomes under study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PK group achieved more effective analgesia at the end of the experiment. The success rate was almost the same in both groups Shivering (p=0.005) and a drop in oxygen saturation to below 92% (p=0.048) were two side effects that were more prevalent in the FK group. The mean recovery time was significantly shorter in the PK group (p<0.001). The patients in the PK group were more satisfied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison with the PF compound, the use of KP leads to better pain relief and greater patient satisfaction and shorter sedation time in PSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/6d/AJEM-2-e44.PMC6548145.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Painful surgical procedures require adequate sedation and analgesia. A vast array of medications can be used for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia (PSA) in Emergency Departments (EDs).

Objective: The present study was conducted to compare Propofol-Ketamine (PK) and Propofol-Fentanyl (PF) compounds in patients undergoing closed reduction in EDs.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted on 110 consecutive patients who required sedation for closed reduction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of equal sizes. The PK group received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg of propofol plus 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine, and the PF group received an intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg of propofol plus 1 µg/kg of fentanyl. The analgesic effect and success rate were the primary outcomes under study.

Results: The PK group achieved more effective analgesia at the end of the experiment. The success rate was almost the same in both groups Shivering (p=0.005) and a drop in oxygen saturation to below 92% (p=0.048) were two side effects that were more prevalent in the FK group. The mean recovery time was significantly shorter in the PK group (p<0.001). The patients in the PK group were more satisfied.

Conclusion: In comparison with the PF compound, the use of KP leads to better pain relief and greater patient satisfaction and shorter sedation time in PSA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丙泊酚-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-芬太尼联合用药治疗闭合复位患者:一项随机、双盲临床试验。
引言:疼痛的外科手术需要足够的镇静和镇痛。大量药物可用于急诊科(ED)的程序性镇静和镇痛(PSA)。目的:本研究比较丙泊酚-氯胺酮(PK)和丙泊酚-芬太尼(PF)化合物在ED闭合复位患者中的作用。方法:对110例连续需要镇静的闭合复位患者进行随机、双盲、临床试验。患者被随机分为两组,每组大小相等。PK组接受1 mg/kg丙泊酚加0.5 mg/kg氯胺酮的静脉推注,PF组接受1 g/kg丙泊酚加1µg/kg芬太尼的静脉推送。镇痛效果和成功率是研究的主要结果。结果:PK组在实验结束时镇痛效果较好。两组的成功率几乎相同。颤抖(p=0.005)和血氧饱和度降至92%以下(p=0.048)是FK组中更常见的两种副作用。PK组的平均恢复时间明显更短(P结论:与PF化合物相比,KP的使用可以更好地缓解疼痛,提高患者满意度,缩短PSA的镇静时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Ramadan on Emergency Department Patients Flow; a Cross-Sectional Study in UAE. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 7: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on a Correlation. Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach. Development and Implementation of Integrated Road Traffic Injuries Surveillance - India (IRIS-India): A Protocol. A Letter on "The Current Status of Genes and Genetic Testing in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1