Effect of three different conditioning agents on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer restorations - An in vitro study.

Mustafa Khan, Harsimran Kaur, Rishika Choudhary, Ramakrishna Yeluri
{"title":"Effect of three different conditioning agents on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer restorations - An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Mustafa Khan,&nbsp;Harsimran Kaur,&nbsp;Rishika Choudhary,&nbsp;Ramakrishna Yeluri","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_144_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the conditioning effects of phosphoric acid/5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) mixture, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate, and 10% polyacrylic acid on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer (GI) restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Out of 68 extracted premolars, 34 teeth were selected for microleakage and 34 for bond strength evaluation. The samples were divided into the following four groups. Group 1: pretreatment with 50/50 volume% mixture of 5.25% NaOCl solution and 37% phosphoric acid (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>), Group 2:pretreatment with 2% CHX digluconate, Group 3: pretreatment with 10% polyacrylic acid (positive control), and Group 4: no pretreatment (negative control). All the samples were then restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC). Microleakage was evaluated using a stereomicroscope and rhodamine-B dye penetration test. For bond strength, flat dentin surface was exposed and pretreated as mentioned previously and restored with GIC and was evaluated using universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all the four groups, Group 1 showed least microleakage and highest bond strength when compared with other groups. Whereas the Group 4 samples which were not pretreated with any of the conditioning agent showed the least shear bond strength with greatest cavosurface microleakage when compared to the groups which were pretreated with the conditioning agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of 50/50 volume % mixture of 37% H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and 5.25% NaOCl can be a good choice for surface pretreatment of GI restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":35797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"40 2","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_144_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the conditioning effects of phosphoric acid/5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) mixture, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate, and 10% polyacrylic acid on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer (GI) restorations.

Materials and methods: Out of 68 extracted premolars, 34 teeth were selected for microleakage and 34 for bond strength evaluation. The samples were divided into the following four groups. Group 1: pretreatment with 50/50 volume% mixture of 5.25% NaOCl solution and 37% phosphoric acid (H3PO4), Group 2:pretreatment with 2% CHX digluconate, Group 3: pretreatment with 10% polyacrylic acid (positive control), and Group 4: no pretreatment (negative control). All the samples were then restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC). Microleakage was evaluated using a stereomicroscope and rhodamine-B dye penetration test. For bond strength, flat dentin surface was exposed and pretreated as mentioned previously and restored with GIC and was evaluated using universal testing machine.

Results: Among all the four groups, Group 1 showed least microleakage and highest bond strength when compared with other groups. Whereas the Group 4 samples which were not pretreated with any of the conditioning agent showed the least shear bond strength with greatest cavosurface microleakage when compared to the groups which were pretreated with the conditioning agents.

Conclusions: A combination of 50/50 volume % mixture of 37% H3PO4 and 5.25% NaOCl can be a good choice for surface pretreatment of GI restorations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种不同调理剂对玻璃离聚体修复体茎叶表面微渗漏和结合强度的影响-体外研究。
目的:研究磷酸/5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)混合物、2%二光酸氯己定(CHX)和10%聚丙烯酸对海参表面微渗漏和玻璃离子(GI)修复体粘结强度的调节作用。材料与方法:在68颗拔除的前磨牙中,选择34颗牙进行微漏,34颗牙进行粘结强度评估。样本被分为以下四组。第1组:5.25% NaOCl溶液与37%磷酸(H3PO4)体积%为50/50的混合物预处理,第2组:2%二光酸CHX预处理,第3组:10%聚丙烯酸预处理(阳性对照),第4组:不预处理(阴性对照)。然后用玻璃离子水泥(GIC)修复所有样品。采用体视显微镜和罗丹明- b染料渗透试验评估微渗漏。牙本质表面平整,如前文所述进行预处理,用GIC修复,并使用万能试验机进行粘接强度评估。结果:四组中,与其他组相比,1组微渗漏最少,结合强度最高。而未使用任何调理剂预处理的第4组样品与使用调理剂预处理的样品相比,显示出最小的剪切结合强度和最大的茎叶表面微泄漏。结论:体积%为50/50的37% H3PO4和5.25% NaOCl组合是修复体表面预处理的较好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry (ISSN - 0970-4388) is the official organ of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. The journal publishes original articles and case reports pertaining to pediatric and preventive dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Bite force evaluation at maximal intercuspal position: An in vivo comparative study between stainless steel and zirconia crowns on primary molar teeth. Traumatic dental injuries - The psychological perspective! Determination and correlation of matrix metalloproteases profile and total antioxidant capacity in severe early childhood caries children - A randomized clinical trial. Assessment of changes in Streptococcus pyogenes levels using N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase marker and pharyngeal airway space with appliance therapy in mouth breathers - An ELISA-based study. Reliability of three pain assessment tools in children requiring dental treatment: A comparative clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1