Comparison of diagnostic values of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for diagnosis of breast lesions.

International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Maryam Farghadani, Jalil Khataei, Mahnaz Fosouli, Maryam Riahinezhad
{"title":"Comparison of diagnostic values of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for diagnosis of breast lesions.","authors":"Maryam Farghadani, Jalil Khataei, Mahnaz Fosouli, Maryam Riahinezhad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a pivotal role in diagnosing breast lesions. Here we aimed to compare the diagnostic values of Abbreviated and Full Breast MRI for breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study performed in 2017-2021 on 80 women with breast lesions. Using the available MRI analysis software, the necessary sequences for the Abbreviated MRI were extracted from standard breast MRI protocol. First, a Full Breast MRI was examined by a radiologist giving Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Then, from this Full Breast MRI, the necessary sequences for Abbreviated Breast MRI were prepared. The second expert radiologist read them in this field and BIRADS was reported. The data relating to each patient were recorded in the patient-specific profile and then the pathology results were followed for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modified breast MRI had 84% sensitivity and 58.18% specificity, while full Breast MRI had 100% sensitivity and 38.18% specificity. Comparing the results of pathology (benign or malignant) for breast tumors and BIRADS reported by modified breast MRI indicated that these results were similar in 53 cases (66.3%) and different in 27 patients (33.8%). On the other hand, similar assessments for Full Breast MRI and pathology reports showed that the results were the same in 46 patients (57.5%) and different in 34 patients (42.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abbreviated breast MRI has lower sensitivity and higher specificity than full breast MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14352,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"193-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301178/pdf/ijppp0014-0193.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a pivotal role in diagnosing breast lesions. Here we aimed to compare the diagnostic values of Abbreviated and Full Breast MRI for breast lesions.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study performed in 2017-2021 on 80 women with breast lesions. Using the available MRI analysis software, the necessary sequences for the Abbreviated MRI were extracted from standard breast MRI protocol. First, a Full Breast MRI was examined by a radiologist giving Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Then, from this Full Breast MRI, the necessary sequences for Abbreviated Breast MRI were prepared. The second expert radiologist read them in this field and BIRADS was reported. The data relating to each patient were recorded in the patient-specific profile and then the pathology results were followed for each patient.

Results: Modified breast MRI had 84% sensitivity and 58.18% specificity, while full Breast MRI had 100% sensitivity and 38.18% specificity. Comparing the results of pathology (benign or malignant) for breast tumors and BIRADS reported by modified breast MRI indicated that these results were similar in 53 cases (66.3%) and different in 27 patients (33.8%). On the other hand, similar assessments for Full Breast MRI and pathology reports showed that the results were the same in 46 patients (57.5%) and different in 34 patients (42.5%).

Conclusion: Abbreviated breast MRI has lower sensitivity and higher specificity than full breast MRI.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种磁共振成像(MRI)方案在诊断乳腺病变方面的诊断价值比较。
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断乳腺病变中起着举足轻重的作用。在此,我们旨在比较简略乳腺 MRI 和全乳腺 MRI 对乳腺病变的诊断价值:这是一项横断面研究,于 2017-2021 年对 80 名患有乳腺病变的女性进行了研究。使用现有的核磁共振成像分析软件,从标准乳腺核磁共振成像方案中提取出简略核磁共振成像的必要序列。首先,由放射科医生根据乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)对全乳腺 MRI 进行检查。然后,根据完整乳房 MRI,准备简略乳房 MRI 所需的序列。第二位放射科专家在这一领域对其进行阅读,并报告 BIRADS。每位患者的相关数据都记录在患者特异性档案中,然后跟踪每位患者的病理结果:改良型乳腺磁共振成像的灵敏度为 84%,特异性为 58.18%,而完整型乳腺磁共振成像的灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 38.18%。比较改良型乳腺磁共振成像报告的乳腺肿瘤和 BIRADS 的病理结果(良性或恶性)显示,53 例患者(66.3%)的病理结果相似,27 例患者(33.8%)的病理结果不同。另一方面,对全乳腺 MRI 和病理报告的类似评估显示,46 例患者(57.5%)的结果相同,34 例患者(42.5%)的结果不同:结论:简略乳腺磁共振成像比完整乳腺磁共振成像的敏感性低,特异性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 modulation of glutamate effects on cortical neuronal synapses: implications for HIV-1-associated neuropathogenesis. Acute paracetamol toxicity-induced inflammatory and oxidative effects are relieved by Aleppo galls: a novel experimental study. Evaluation of PD-L1 antigen expression using immunohistochemistry technique in medullary thyroid carcinoma samples. Effectiveness of yoga on Ewing's battery autonomic function test: cross-sectional study. NAD+ administration profoundly decreases UVC-induced skin damage by attenuating oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage and apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1