The "Whack-a-Mole" Challenge of Hypnosis Research: A Commentary Regarding "Guidelines for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications".

Michael D Yapko
{"title":"The \"Whack-a-Mole\" Challenge of Hypnosis Research: A Commentary Regarding \"Guidelines for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications\".","authors":"Michael D Yapko","doi":"10.1080/00207144.2022.2104648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this short commentary, the author acknowledges the merits of trying to establish treatment guidelines for the use of hypnosis in treatment and applauds the efforts and intentions of the <i>Task Force for Establishing Efficacy Standards for Clinical Hypnosis</i>. He identifies a few of the complex issues in trying to promote guidelines for conducting research and clinical practice in the domain of hypnosis; these include the difficulties in defining hypnosis and hypnotically-based interventions, the divergent ways hypnosis is applied in actual practice by clinicians who rely on their own understandings and biases in designing and delivering hypnosis, and the inevitable variations in skill level across practitioners. To their credit, the <i>Task Force</i> has considered these and other practical issues in their approach to formulating guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":185230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis","volume":" ","pages":"220-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2104648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this short commentary, the author acknowledges the merits of trying to establish treatment guidelines for the use of hypnosis in treatment and applauds the efforts and intentions of the Task Force for Establishing Efficacy Standards for Clinical Hypnosis. He identifies a few of the complex issues in trying to promote guidelines for conducting research and clinical practice in the domain of hypnosis; these include the difficulties in defining hypnosis and hypnotically-based interventions, the divergent ways hypnosis is applied in actual practice by clinicians who rely on their own understandings and biases in designing and delivering hypnosis, and the inevitable variations in skill level across practitioners. To their credit, the Task Force has considered these and other practical issues in their approach to formulating guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠研究的“打地鼠”挑战:评《临床催眠应用疗效评估指南》
在这篇简短的评论中,作者承认试图建立催眠治疗指南的优点,并赞扬建立临床催眠疗效标准工作组的努力和意图。他指出了一些复杂的问题,试图促进指导方针进行研究和临床实践在催眠领域;其中包括定义催眠和基于催眠的干预的困难,临床医生在设计和实施催眠时依赖于自己的理解和偏见,在实际实践中应用催眠的不同方式,以及从业者之间不可避免的技能水平差异。值得赞扬的是,工作队在制定准则的方法中考虑了这些问题和其他实际问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction. French Norms for the Online Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability. Pilot Study of Hypnotic Relaxation Therapy for Well-Being (HRT-WB): A New Intervention to Enhance Well-Being and Positive Affect. Feasibility of the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale-Spanish Translation. Commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1