Climate change mitigation in British Columbia’s forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Carbon Balance and Management Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s13021-020-00155-2
C. E. Smyth, Z. Xu, T. C. Lemprière, W. A. Kurz
{"title":"Climate change mitigation in British Columbia’s forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts","authors":"C. E. Smyth,&nbsp;Z. Xu,&nbsp;T. C. Lemprière,&nbsp;W. A. Kurz","doi":"10.1186/s13021-020-00155-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential contributions from forest-based greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation actions need to be quantified to develop pathways towards net negative emissions. Here we present results from a comparative analysis that examined mitigation options for British Columbia’s forest sector. Mitigation scenarios were evaluated using a systems perspective that takes into account the changes in emissions and removals in forest ecosystems, in harvested wood product (HWP) carbon stocks, and in other sectors where wood products substitute for emission-intensive materials and fossil fuels. All mitigation activities were assessed relative to a forward-looking ‘business as usual’ baseline for three implementation levels. In addition to quantifying net GHG emission reductions, we assessed economic, and socio-economic impacts as well as other environmental indicators relating to forest species, age class, deadwood availability and future timber supply. We further considered risks of reversal for land-based scenarios, by assessing impacts of increasing future wildfires on stands that were not harvested.</p><p>Our spatially explicit analyses of forest sector mitigation options demonstrated a cost-effective portfolio of regionally differentiated scenarios that directed more of the harvested wood to longer-lived wood products, stopped burning of harvest residues and instead produced bioenergy to displace fossil fuel burning, and reduced harvest levels in regions with low disturbance rates. Domestically, net GHG emissions were reduced by an average of -9 MtCO<sub>2</sub>e year<sup>?1</sup> over 2020–2050 for a portfolio of mitigation activities at a default implementation level, with about 85% of the GHG emission reductions achieved below a cost of $50/tCO<sub>2</sub>e. Normalizing the net GHG reduction by changes in harvested wood levels permitted comparisons of the scenarios with different ambition levels, and showed that a 1 MtCO<sub>2</sub> increase in cumulative harvested stemwood results in a 1 MtCO<sub>2</sub>e reduction in cumulative emissions, relative to the baseline, for the <i>Higher Recovery</i> scenario in 2070.</p><p>The analyses conducted in this study contribute to the global understanding of forest sector mitigation options by providing an integrated framework to synthesize the methods, assumptions, datasets and models needed to quantify mitigation activities using a systems approach. An understanding of economically feasible and socio-economically attractive mitigation scenarios along with trade offs for environmental indicators relating to species composition and age, helps decision makers with long-term planning for land sector contributions to GHG emission reduction efforts, and provides valuable information for stakeholder consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13021-020-00155-2","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-020-00155-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The potential contributions from forest-based greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation actions need to be quantified to develop pathways towards net negative emissions. Here we present results from a comparative analysis that examined mitigation options for British Columbia’s forest sector. Mitigation scenarios were evaluated using a systems perspective that takes into account the changes in emissions and removals in forest ecosystems, in harvested wood product (HWP) carbon stocks, and in other sectors where wood products substitute for emission-intensive materials and fossil fuels. All mitigation activities were assessed relative to a forward-looking ‘business as usual’ baseline for three implementation levels. In addition to quantifying net GHG emission reductions, we assessed economic, and socio-economic impacts as well as other environmental indicators relating to forest species, age class, deadwood availability and future timber supply. We further considered risks of reversal for land-based scenarios, by assessing impacts of increasing future wildfires on stands that were not harvested.

Our spatially explicit analyses of forest sector mitigation options demonstrated a cost-effective portfolio of regionally differentiated scenarios that directed more of the harvested wood to longer-lived wood products, stopped burning of harvest residues and instead produced bioenergy to displace fossil fuel burning, and reduced harvest levels in regions with low disturbance rates. Domestically, net GHG emissions were reduced by an average of -9 MtCO2e year?1 over 2020–2050 for a portfolio of mitigation activities at a default implementation level, with about 85% of the GHG emission reductions achieved below a cost of $50/tCO2e. Normalizing the net GHG reduction by changes in harvested wood levels permitted comparisons of the scenarios with different ambition levels, and showed that a 1 MtCO2 increase in cumulative harvested stemwood results in a 1 MtCO2e reduction in cumulative emissions, relative to the baseline, for the Higher Recovery scenario in 2070.

The analyses conducted in this study contribute to the global understanding of forest sector mitigation options by providing an integrated framework to synthesize the methods, assumptions, datasets and models needed to quantify mitigation activities using a systems approach. An understanding of economically feasible and socio-economically attractive mitigation scenarios along with trade offs for environmental indicators relating to species composition and age, helps decision makers with long-term planning for land sector contributions to GHG emission reduction efforts, and provides valuable information for stakeholder consultations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不列颠哥伦比亚省森林部门的气候变化缓解:温室气体减排、成本和环境影响
基于森林的温室气体(GHG)缓解行动的潜在贡献需要量化,以制定实现净负排放的途径。在此,我们提出了一项比较分析的结果,该分析审查了不列颠哥伦比亚省森林部门的缓解方案。采用系统观点对减缓情景进行了评估,该观点考虑了森林生态系统、采伐木材产品(HWP)碳储量以及木材产品替代排放密集型材料和化石燃料的其他部门的排放和清除变化。所有缓解活动都相对于三个执行级别的前瞻性“一切照旧”基线进行了评估。除了量化温室气体净排放量外,我们还评估了经济和社会经济影响以及与森林物种、年龄类别、枯木可用性和未来木材供应有关的其他环境指标。通过评估未来不断增加的野火对未采伐林分的影响,我们进一步考虑了陆地情景逆转的风险。我们对森林部门缓解方案的空间明确分析表明,区域差异化方案具有成本效益组合,可将更多采伐木材转化为寿命更长的木材产品,停止燃烧采伐残留物,转而生产生物能源以取代化石燃料燃烧,并降低干扰率低的地区的采伐水平。在国内,温室气体净排放量平均每年减少- 900万吨二氧化碳当量。1 .在2020-2050年期间,在默认执行水平上开展一系列减缓活动,在每吨二氧化碳当量50美元的成本以下实现约85%的温室气体减排。通过采伐木材水平的变化使温室气体净减量正常化,可以对不同目标水平的情景进行比较,结果表明,在2070年较高恢复情景中,累积采伐的茎干木材每增加100万吨二氧化碳,累积排放量相对于基线减少100万吨二氧化碳当量。本研究中进行的分析提供了一个综合框架,以综合使用系统方法量化缓解活动所需的方法、假设、数据集和模型,从而有助于全球了解森林部门的缓解备选方案。了解经济上可行和社会经济上有吸引力的缓解方案,以及权衡与物种组成和年龄有关的环境指标,有助于决策者长期规划土地部门对温室气体减排努力的贡献,并为利益攸关方磋商提供宝贵信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
期刊最新文献
Methane cycling in temperate forests Stand structure and Brazilian pine as key determinants of carbon stock in a subtropical Atlantic forest Carbon, climate, and natural disturbance: a review of mechanisms, challenges, and tools for understanding forest carbon stability in an uncertain future Accounting for carbon emissions in social water cycle system in nine provinces along the yellow river and analysis of influencing factors Quantification of biomass availability for wood harvesting and storage in the continental United States with a carbon cycle model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1