The wheezy infant: A viewpoint from low-middle income countries

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Paediatric Respiratory Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prrv.2022.06.001
{"title":"The wheezy infant: A viewpoint from low-middle income countries","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prrv.2022.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To review the recent evidence in the literature of various aspects of recurrent/severe wheezing in children under 3 in low-middle income countries [LMICS].</p></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><p>A non-systematic review including articles in English. We mainly selected publications from the last 5 years. Studies on epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were included in the search. We reviewed differential diagnoses of wheezing that focused on LMICS. We also reviewed aspects of prevention.</p></div><div><h3>Summary of the findings</h3><p>Many epidemiological studies have shown a variable but significant number of wheezy infants [WI] cases in LMICS when compared to other countries.</p><p>The differential diagnosis of causes of wheezing in this age group is mandatory, taking into account local facilities.</p><p>Few treatment options have been well studied for this age group. In LMICS, a pragmatic approach could be considered, as described in the article.</p><p>It is difficult to study primary prevention for WI and secondary prevention (mainly environmental) may have some impact.</p><p>A schematic approach for recurrent wheezers is presented, which takes into account settings with limited resources.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Severely or recurrently wheezy children under 3 is a common clinical issue in LMICS. Studies on this age group are needed to reduce the significant morbidity. It may be possible to lower the high burden of wheezing in this age group by selecting the phenotype which may respond to inhaled steroids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19658,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric Respiratory Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526054222000458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To review the recent evidence in the literature of various aspects of recurrent/severe wheezing in children under 3 in low-middle income countries [LMICS].

Sources

A non-systematic review including articles in English. We mainly selected publications from the last 5 years. Studies on epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention were included in the search. We reviewed differential diagnoses of wheezing that focused on LMICS. We also reviewed aspects of prevention.

Summary of the findings

Many epidemiological studies have shown a variable but significant number of wheezy infants [WI] cases in LMICS when compared to other countries.

The differential diagnosis of causes of wheezing in this age group is mandatory, taking into account local facilities.

Few treatment options have been well studied for this age group. In LMICS, a pragmatic approach could be considered, as described in the article.

It is difficult to study primary prevention for WI and secondary prevention (mainly environmental) may have some impact.

A schematic approach for recurrent wheezers is presented, which takes into account settings with limited resources.

Conclusion

Severely or recurrently wheezy children under 3 is a common clinical issue in LMICS. Studies on this age group are needed to reduce the significant morbidity. It may be possible to lower the high burden of wheezing in this age group by selecting the phenotype which may respond to inhaled steroids.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喘息的婴儿:来自中低收入国家的观点。
目的回顾中低收入国家(LMICS)3 岁以下儿童反复/严重喘息各方面的最新文献证据:资料来源:非系统性综述,包括英文文章。我们主要选择了过去 5 年中的出版物。检索包括有关流行病学、病因学、诊断、治疗和预防的研究。我们回顾了以 LMICS 为重点的喘息的鉴别诊断。我们还审查了预防的各个方面:许多流行病学研究表明,与其他国家相比,低收入国家的喘息婴儿 [WI] 病例数量不一,但数量可观。考虑到当地的设施,必须对这一年龄组的喘息病因进行鉴别诊断。针对这一年龄组的治疗方案鲜有研究。在低收入国家,可以考虑文章中所述的务实方法。很难研究 WI 的一级预防,二级预防(主要是环境)可能会有一些影响。文章介绍了针对反复喘息者的示意性方法,其中考虑到了资源有限的环境:结论:3 岁以下儿童喘息严重或反复发作是低收入国家常见的临床问题。需要对这一年龄组的儿童进行研究,以降低重大的发病率。通过选择可能对吸入类固醇有反应的表型,有可能降低这一年龄组的高喘息负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: Paediatric Respiratory Reviews offers authors the opportunity to submit their own editorials, educational reviews and short communications on topics relevant to paediatric respiratory medicine. These peer reviewed contributions will complement the commissioned reviews which will continue to form an integral part of the journal. Subjects covered include: • Epidemiology • Immunology and cell biology • Physiology • Occupational disorders • The role of allergens and pollutants A particular emphasis is given to the recommendation of "best practice" for primary care physicians and paediatricians. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews is aimed at general paediatricians but it should also be read by specialist paediatric physicians and nurses, respiratory physicians and general practitioners. It is a journal for those who are busy and do not have time to read systematically through literature, but who need to stay up to date in the field of paediatric respiratory and sleep medicine.
期刊最新文献
Addition of long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma in preschool children: A systematic review. Outcomes of paediatric community acquired pneumonia. Impact of highly effective modulator therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms and features in people with cystic fibrosis. Pulmonary manifestations of Pseudohypoaldosteronism type 1b: A systematic review of the literature. Face masks and protection against COVID-19 and other viral respiratory infections: Assessment of benefits and harms in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1