The Indian Academy of Cytologists Guidelines for Reporting Serous Effusion (IACGRSE): An Interobserver Agreement Analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Cytology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-17 DOI:10.4103/joc.joc_50_22
Vaishali B Nagose, Meharbano M Kamal, Surbhi S Kathuria, Shraddha A Laddhad
{"title":"The Indian Academy of Cytologists Guidelines for Reporting Serous Effusion (IACGRSE): An Interobserver Agreement Analysis.","authors":"Vaishali B Nagose,&nbsp;Meharbano M Kamal,&nbsp;Surbhi S Kathuria,&nbsp;Shraddha A Laddhad","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_50_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The Indian Academy of Cytologists published Guidelines and categories for Reporting Serous Effusions (IACGRSE) in 2020 to improve consistency and reproducibility of fluid cytology reporting and to guide patient management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate category-wise agreement while using IACGRSE 2020 categories. To analyze interobserver agreement among participants with different level of training and years of experience.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A retrospective interobserver variability study.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>Study was done with four participants: an expert cytopathologist and three cytopathology fellows with varying experience. Fluid smears from 60 cases with clinical and/or radiological evidence of malignancy were categorized into one of the five IACGRSE 2020 categories. The interpretations of expert cytopathologist were taken as standard.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Previous cases without definitive category got classified into \"Atypical cells NOS\" (3.33%) and \"Atypical cells, Suspicious of Malignancy\" (15%). Agreement analysis for IACGRSE 2020 categories showed better concordance for inadequate (I), malignant (V), and benign (II) categories. The range of Kappa for interobserver agreement of fellows was fair to substantial (range 0.1692-0.7249). The participant with substantial diagnostic agreement with expert (κ = 0.729, 88.3%) had the most experience. Causes of major discordance were pertaining to paucity and distribution of cells, and to misinterpretation of reactive mesothelial cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IACGRSE 2020 categories and participants' experience were important determinants in classifying the effusion fluid cytology smears and interobserver agreement; emphasizing the need to use IACGRSE2020, and sufficient time and training required for accurate diagnosis of fluid specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_50_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The Indian Academy of Cytologists published Guidelines and categories for Reporting Serous Effusions (IACGRSE) in 2020 to improve consistency and reproducibility of fluid cytology reporting and to guide patient management.

Aims: To evaluate category-wise agreement while using IACGRSE 2020 categories. To analyze interobserver agreement among participants with different level of training and years of experience.

Settings and design: A retrospective interobserver variability study.

Methods and material: Study was done with four participants: an expert cytopathologist and three cytopathology fellows with varying experience. Fluid smears from 60 cases with clinical and/or radiological evidence of malignancy were categorized into one of the five IACGRSE 2020 categories. The interpretations of expert cytopathologist were taken as standard.

Statistical analysis used: Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistics.

Results: Previous cases without definitive category got classified into "Atypical cells NOS" (3.33%) and "Atypical cells, Suspicious of Malignancy" (15%). Agreement analysis for IACGRSE 2020 categories showed better concordance for inadequate (I), malignant (V), and benign (II) categories. The range of Kappa for interobserver agreement of fellows was fair to substantial (range 0.1692-0.7249). The participant with substantial diagnostic agreement with expert (κ = 0.729, 88.3%) had the most experience. Causes of major discordance were pertaining to paucity and distribution of cells, and to misinterpretation of reactive mesothelial cells.

Conclusions: IACGRSE 2020 categories and participants' experience were important determinants in classifying the effusion fluid cytology smears and interobserver agreement; emphasizing the need to use IACGRSE2020, and sufficient time and training required for accurate diagnosis of fluid specimens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度细胞学学会严重积液报告指南(IACGRSE):观察者间协议分析。
背景:印度细胞学学会于2020年发布了《浆液积液报告指南和分类》(IACGRSE),以提高液体细胞学报告的一致性和可重复性,并指导患者管理。目的:在使用IACGRSE 2020类别时评估类别明智的协议。分析具有不同培训水平和经验的参与者之间的观察者之间的一致性。环境和设计:一项回顾性的观察者间变异性研究。方法和材料:研究由四名参与者完成:一名细胞病理学专家和三名具有不同经验的细胞病理学研究员。60例具有临床和/或放射学证据的恶性肿瘤患者的液体涂片被归类为IACGRSE 2020的五个类别之一。以细胞病理学专家的解释为标准。采用统计分析:采用Kappa统计分析观察者间的一致性。结果:既往无明确分类的病例分为“非典型细胞NOS”(3.33%)和“非典型细胞,可疑恶性肿瘤”(15%)。IACGRSE 2020分类的一致性分析显示,不充分(I)、恶性(V)和良性(II)分类的一致性更好。Kappa在观察者之间达成共识的范围是相当大的(范围为0.1692-0.7249)。与专家诊断基本一致的参与者(κ = 0.729, 88.3%)经验最多。主要不一致的原因与细胞的缺乏和分布有关,以及对反应性间皮细胞的误解。结论:IACGRSE 2020分类和参与者的经验是积液细胞学涂片分类和观察者间一致性的重要决定因素;强调需要使用IACGRSE2020,以及准确诊断液体标本所需的足够时间和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cytology
Journal of Cytology MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Image Morphometry in the Atypical Urothelial Cells and High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Categories of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology Aptima HPV Genotypes in Abnormal Cervical Samples in Different Age Groups – Implication on Vaccination Strategies Cytomorphological Features as a Subtyping Tool of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Brushing Bronchoscopic Samples Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy of Pilomatrixoma (Cytological Features of Six Cases Histologically Approved) Effectivity of Touch Imprint Cytology of Core Needle Biopsy in Evaluation of Breast Lesions: A Study in Changing Trends of Rapid on Site Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1