Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart International Pub Date : 2021-07-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2021.15.1.26
Clifton Espinoza, Debabrata Mukherjee
{"title":"Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.","authors":"Clifton Espinoza, Debabrata Mukherjee","doi":"10.17925/HI.2021.15.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent throughout the world, with a significant impact on global health. There is a vast collection of data in the medical literature relating to the topic of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients considered to be at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. In order to perform a narrative review of literature regarding the use of DAPT in patients with high CV risk, PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase were searched for English-language articles from 1985 to December 2020 by using the medical subject heading terms and keywords 'antiplatelet therapy' and 'high-risk cardiovascular disease', alone or in combination. Both authors critically reviewed the design, population characteristics and results of the selected studies. The topic of DAPT in patients with high CV risk is fluid and constantly evolving. The landmark trials of CURE, TRITON-TIMI 38 and PLATO provided evidence for the optimal use of DAPT in patients after acute coronary syndrome, while the CHARISMA and MATCH trials provided guidance for clinicians for their use in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association focused update, published in 2016, and the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, published in 2017, were developed to provide guidance to clinicians based on the available data at the time to be able to choose the appropriate DAPT strategy that would provide patients with the maximum clinical benefit. The management of DAPT in patients with high CV risk is a challenging task, with new data on the subject constantly being reported. Balancing ischaemic benefit with potential bleeding complications adds to the complexity of managing DAPT in these patients. With all the available data and current clinical guidelines, patients deemed at high CV risk should be considered for DAPT, taking into account individual risk:benefit ratio. In most individuals with high CV risk, the net clinical benefit favours the use of DAPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"15 1","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584145/pdf/heart-int-15-26.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2021.15.1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent throughout the world, with a significant impact on global health. There is a vast collection of data in the medical literature relating to the topic of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients considered to be at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. In order to perform a narrative review of literature regarding the use of DAPT in patients with high CV risk, PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase were searched for English-language articles from 1985 to December 2020 by using the medical subject heading terms and keywords 'antiplatelet therapy' and 'high-risk cardiovascular disease', alone or in combination. Both authors critically reviewed the design, population characteristics and results of the selected studies. The topic of DAPT in patients with high CV risk is fluid and constantly evolving. The landmark trials of CURE, TRITON-TIMI 38 and PLATO provided evidence for the optimal use of DAPT in patients after acute coronary syndrome, while the CHARISMA and MATCH trials provided guidance for clinicians for their use in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association focused update, published in 2016, and the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, published in 2017, were developed to provide guidance to clinicians based on the available data at the time to be able to choose the appropriate DAPT strategy that would provide patients with the maximum clinical benefit. The management of DAPT in patients with high CV risk is a challenging task, with new data on the subject constantly being reported. Balancing ischaemic benefit with potential bleeding complications adds to the complexity of managing DAPT in these patients. With all the available data and current clinical guidelines, patients deemed at high CV risk should be considered for DAPT, taking into account individual risk:benefit ratio. In most individuals with high CV risk, the net clinical benefit favours the use of DAPT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高心血管风险患者的双重抗血小板疗法。
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)在全世界都很普遍,对全球健康产生了重大影响。医学文献中有大量数据涉及心血管(CV)高风险患者的双重抗血小板疗法(DAPT)。为了对心血管疾病高危患者使用 DAPT 的相关文献进行叙述性综述,我们在 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Embase 中使用医学主题词和关键词 "抗血小板疗法 "和 "高危心血管疾病",单独或合并检索了 1985 年至 2020 年 12 月期间的英文文章。两位作者对所选研究的设计、人群特征和结果进行了严格审查。针对高心血管风险患者的 DAPT 这一主题是多变的,并在不断演变。具有里程碑意义的 CURE、TRITON-TIMI 38 和 PLATO 试验为急性冠脉综合征患者最佳使用 DAPT 提供了证据,而 CHARISMA 和 MATCH 试验则为临床医生在冠状动脉疾病稳定期患者中使用 DAPT 提供了指导。2016 年发布的美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会重点更新指南和 2017 年发布的欧洲心脏病学会指南旨在根据当时可用的数据为临床医生提供指导,使其能够选择适当的 DAPT 策略,为患者带来最大的临床获益。高心血管风险患者的 DAPT 管理是一项具有挑战性的任务,有关这一主题的新数据不断被报道。在缺血性获益和潜在出血并发症之间取得平衡增加了管理这些患者的 DAPT 的复杂性。根据现有的所有数据和当前的临床指南,在考虑到个体风险与获益比的情况下,应考虑对心血管疾病高危患者进行 DAPT 治疗。对于大多数心血管疾病高危患者来说,使用 DAPT 的净临床获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Commonly Used 3D Mapping Systems in Acute Success Rates of Catheter Ablation Procedures. Evolution of Disease-modifying Therapy for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis. Femoral Neck Osteoporosis Is Associated with a Higher Odds of Coronary Artery Disease in Indian Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-sectional Study from a Teaching Hospital in Southern India. Cardiovascular Implications of Semaglutide in Obesity Management: Redefining Cardiovascular Health Strategies. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the NAVITOR Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1