Changes in ocular pulse amplitude and posterior ocular structure parameters in type 1 diabetic children without diabetic retinopathy.

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-07-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414221101710
Abdulvahit Asik, Semih Bolu, Ilke Direkci, Emre Aydemir, Gozde Aksoy Aydemir
{"title":"Changes in ocular pulse amplitude and posterior ocular structure parameters in type 1 diabetic children without diabetic retinopathy.","authors":"Abdulvahit Asik,&nbsp;Semih Bolu,&nbsp;Ilke Direkci,&nbsp;Emre Aydemir,&nbsp;Gozde Aksoy Aydemir","doi":"10.1177/25158414221101710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to determine changes in posterior ocular structures in the early period before retinopathy develops in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate inner plexiform layer (IPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses, as well as the relationship between choroidal thickness (CT) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in type 1 diabetic children without diabetic retinopathy (DR).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 44) consisted of pediatric patients with type 1 DM without DR, and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 65) of pediatric control subjects. Both intraocular pressure (IOP) and OPA were measured using a dynamic contour tonometer. CT, IPL, GCL, and RNFL were all measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean IOP and OPA values were 16.67 ± 2.34 and 1.85 ± 0.34, respectively, in group 1, and 15.14 ± 2.17 and 1.65 ± 0.25 in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.001 for both). The mean subfoveal CT value was 294.30 ± 67.61 μm in group 1 and 394.42 ± 69.65 μm in Group 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean GCL and RNFL values were 1.09 ± 0.11 and 96.46 ± 11.69, respectively, in group 1, and 1.14 ± 0.09 and 101.73 ± 9.33 in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.005 and <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOP and OPA values were higher, and CT, GCL, and RNFL values were lower in children with type 1 DM during the early stages than in the healthy control group. These findings suggest that CT may be a marker of retinal involvement in children with type 1 DM without DR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/89/10.1177_25158414221101710.PMC9272198.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414221101710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: It is important to determine changes in posterior ocular structures in the early period before retinopathy develops in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Objective: To evaluate inner plexiform layer (IPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses, as well as the relationship between choroidal thickness (CT) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in type 1 diabetic children without diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Design: A prospective observational study.

Methods: Group 1 (n = 44) consisted of pediatric patients with type 1 DM without DR, and Group 2 (n = 65) of pediatric control subjects. Both intraocular pressure (IOP) and OPA were measured using a dynamic contour tonometer. CT, IPL, GCL, and RNFL were all measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Results: The mean IOP and OPA values were 16.67 ± 2.34 and 1.85 ± 0.34, respectively, in group 1, and 15.14 ± 2.17 and 1.65 ± 0.25 in Group 2 (p = 0.001 for both). The mean subfoveal CT value was 294.30 ± 67.61 μm in group 1 and 394.42 ± 69.65 μm in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The mean GCL and RNFL values were 1.09 ± 0.11 and 96.46 ± 11.69, respectively, in group 1, and 1.14 ± 0.09 and 101.73 ± 9.33 in Group 2 (p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively).

Conclusions: IOP and OPA values were higher, and CT, GCL, and RNFL values were lower in children with type 1 DM during the early stages than in the healthy control group. These findings suggest that CT may be a marker of retinal involvement in children with type 1 DM without DR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无糖尿病视网膜病变的1型糖尿病儿童眼脉冲振幅和眼后结构参数的变化。
背景:在1型糖尿病(DM)患儿视网膜病变发生前早期确定后眼结构的变化是很重要的。目的:探讨无糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的1型糖尿病患儿视网膜内丛状层(IPL)、神经节细胞层(GCL)、视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度及脉络膜厚度(CT)与眼脉冲幅值(OPA)的关系。设计:前瞻性观察性研究。方法:第一组(n = 44)为无DR的1型糖尿病患儿,第二组(n = 65)为儿童对照。眼压(IOP)和眼压(OPA)均采用动态轮廓眼压计测量。CT、IPL、GCL和RNFL均采用光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量。结果:组1平均IOP为16.67±2.34,OPA为1.85±0.34;组2平均IOP为15.14±2.17,OPA为1.65±0.25 (p = 0.001)。1组和2组的平均CT值分别为294.30±67.61 μm和394.42±69.65 μm (p值分别为0.005和0.008)。结论:1型糖尿病患儿早期IOP、OPA值高于健康对照组,CT、GCL、RNFL值低于健康对照组。这些发现提示CT可能是无DR的1型糖尿病儿童视网膜受累的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren. Neurochemistry and functional connectivity in the brain of people with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Early diagnostics and interventional glaucoma. Emotional well-being in Charles Bonnet syndrome: exploring associations with negative affect, loneliness and quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1