Measurement Properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Massive Open Online Course Cohort: A Rasch Analysis.

Q2 Medicine Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-05 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20220720-01
Barnabas Bessing, Cynthia A Honan, Ingrid van der Mei, Bruce V Taylor, Suzi B Claflin
{"title":"Measurement Properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Massive Open Online Course Cohort: A Rasch Analysis.","authors":"Barnabas Bessing, Cynthia A Honan, Ingrid van der Mei, Bruce V Taylor, Suzi B Claflin","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220720-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online health education and other electronic health improvement strategies are developing rapidly, highlighting the growing need for valid scales to assess health literacy (HL). One comprehensive HL scale is the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), but little is known about its measurement properties in online health education cohorts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if the multidimensional HLQ is an appropriate tool to measure HL in a cohort of Understanding Multiple Sclerosis (MS) online course enrollees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants who enrolled in the first two open enrollments of the Understanding MS online course completed the HLQ (<i>N</i> = 1,182) in an online survey prior to beginning course materials. We used Rasch analysis to assess the measurement properties of the HLQ.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The nine Domains of the HLQ each had ordered category function and a good fit with the Rasch model. Each domain was one-dimensional and exhibited good internal consistency and reliability. None of the 44 individual items of the HLQ demonstrated item bias or local dependency. However, while the overall fit was good, few measurement gaps were identified in this cohort for participants in each of the nine Domains, meaning that the HLQ may have low measurement precision in some participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis of the HLQ indicated acceptable measurement properties in a cohort of Understanding MS online course enrollees. Although reliable information on nine separate constructs of HL was obtainable in the current study indicating that the HLQ can be used in similar cohorts, its limitations must be also considered. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(3):e200-e212.</b>] Plain Language Summary: In this study, we have shown that the HLQ is suitable for measuring HL in an online public health educational platforms for chronic diseases including multiple sclerosis. This finding adds to the evidence that the HLQ can be widely used in measuring HL in different settings, populations, and health educational platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"e200-e212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220720-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online health education and other electronic health improvement strategies are developing rapidly, highlighting the growing need for valid scales to assess health literacy (HL). One comprehensive HL scale is the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), but little is known about its measurement properties in online health education cohorts.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if the multidimensional HLQ is an appropriate tool to measure HL in a cohort of Understanding Multiple Sclerosis (MS) online course enrollees.

Methods: Participants who enrolled in the first two open enrollments of the Understanding MS online course completed the HLQ (N = 1,182) in an online survey prior to beginning course materials. We used Rasch analysis to assess the measurement properties of the HLQ.

Key results: The nine Domains of the HLQ each had ordered category function and a good fit with the Rasch model. Each domain was one-dimensional and exhibited good internal consistency and reliability. None of the 44 individual items of the HLQ demonstrated item bias or local dependency. However, while the overall fit was good, few measurement gaps were identified in this cohort for participants in each of the nine Domains, meaning that the HLQ may have low measurement precision in some participants.

Conclusion: Our analysis of the HLQ indicated acceptable measurement properties in a cohort of Understanding MS online course enrollees. Although reliable information on nine separate constructs of HL was obtainable in the current study indicating that the HLQ can be used in similar cohorts, its limitations must be also considered. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(3):e200-e212.] Plain Language Summary: In this study, we have shown that the HLQ is suitable for measuring HL in an online public health educational platforms for chronic diseases including multiple sclerosis. This finding adds to the evidence that the HLQ can be widely used in measuring HL in different settings, populations, and health educational platforms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解多发性硬化症》大规模开放式在线课程队列中健康素养问卷的测量特性:Rasch 分析。
背景:在线健康教育和其他电子健康改善策略发展迅速,这凸显了对有效评估健康素养(HL)的量表的需求日益增长。健康素养问卷(HLQ)是一种全面的健康素养量表,但人们对其在在线健康教育群体中的测量特性知之甚少:本研究旨在确定多维健康素养问卷是否是测量 "了解多发性硬化症(MS)"在线课程学员健康素养的合适工具:参加 "了解多发性硬化症 "在线课程前两期公开招生的学员(人数 = 1,182)在开始学习课程材料之前,通过在线调查完成了 HLQ(人数 = 1,182)。我们使用 Rasch 分析法评估了 HLQ 的测量特性:主要结果:HLQ 的九个领域均具有有序类别功能,并与 Rasch 模型高度契合。每个领域都是一维的,并表现出良好的内部一致性和可靠性。在 HLQ 的 44 个单项中,没有一个出现项目偏差或局部依赖性。不过,虽然总体拟合度良好,但在这批参与者中,在九个领域中的每个领域都发现了很少的测量差距,这意味着 HLQ 对某些参与者的测量精度可能较低:我们对 HLQ 的分析表明,"理解 MS "在线课程的学员群体具有可接受的测量特性。尽管本研究获得了关于健康素养九个独立构面的可靠信息,表明健康素养问卷可用于类似的群体,但也必须考虑其局限性。[HLRP:健康素养研究与实践。2022;6(3):e200-e212.] 原文摘要:在本研究中,我们证明了 HLQ 适合用于测量慢性疾病(包括多发性硬化症)在线公共健康教育平台中的健康素养。这一发现进一步证明,HLQ 可广泛应用于不同环境、人群和健康教育平台的 HL 测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1