Background: Health literacy (HL) plays a crucial role in navigating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, especially with the abundance of conflicting information from unauthorized sources.
Objective: This study aims to measure COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, COVID-19 HL, and COVID-19 infodemic and their predictors in Iranians.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on the general population in Iran between August 20, 2021 to October 29, 2021. Data were collected using a valid questionnaire with four parts. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, generalized linear models, and ordinal regression with the Polytomous Universal Model were performed using SPSS version 26.
Key results: The study revealed that 68.6% of the participants were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine, 45% had sufficient knowledge about COVID-19, and 52.2% were confused by false information during the pandemic. The results showed that having sufficient COVID-19 HL was significantly associated with higher acceptance of the vaccine (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 2.12). Additionally, higher COVID-19 HL scores were associated with a higher adjusted odds of confusion by false information with an odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: 1 .11, 1 .13).
Conclusion: This study exhibits low levels of COVID-19 HL in Iran, and the fact that higher COVID-19 HL is associated with higher vaccine acceptance. Because vaccination is an essential preventive measure to stop the COVID-19 pandemic, factors associated with low vaccine acceptance need to be addressed by public health strategies. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e184-e193.].
{"title":"Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Fatemeh Ebrahimi, Samaneh Torkian, Roya Rashti, Mahasti Emami, Hossein Shahnazi, Mohammad Reza Maracy","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240607-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240607-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy (HL) plays a crucial role in navigating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, especially with the abundance of conflicting information from unauthorized sources.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to measure COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, COVID-19 HL, and COVID-19 infodemic and their predictors in Iranians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on the general population in Iran between August 20, 2021 to October 29, 2021. Data were collected using a valid questionnaire with four parts. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, generalized linear models, and ordinal regression with the Polytomous Universal Model were performed using SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The study revealed that 68.6% of the participants were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine, 45% had sufficient knowledge about COVID-19, and 52.2% were confused by false information during the pandemic. The results showed that having sufficient COVID-19 HL was significantly associated with higher acceptance of the vaccine (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 2.12). Additionally, higher COVID-19 HL scores were associated with a higher adjusted odds of confusion by false information with an odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: 1 .11, 1 .13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study exhibits low levels of COVID-19 HL in Iran, and the fact that higher COVID-19 HL is associated with higher vaccine acceptance. Because vaccination is an essential preventive measure to stop the COVID-19 pandemic, factors associated with low vaccine acceptance need to be addressed by public health strategies. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e184-e193.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e184-e193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610625/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-10-08DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240625-01
Simone Rodrigues, Ana Isabel Patrício, Cátia Cristina, Flávia Fernandes, Gisela Marcelino Santos, Inês Antunes, Inês Pintalhão, Marília Ribeiro, Rita Lopes, Silvana Moreira, Sofia A Oliveira, Susana Pereira Costa, Susete Simões, Tatiana Carvalho Nunes, Luiz Miguel Santiago, Inês Rosendo
Background: Therapy adherence is a key factor in the control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Optimal self-care requires skills in health literacy (HL).
Objective: This study aims to analyze the relationship between HL and adherence to therapy and to understand the possible influence of other sociodemographic and disease variables.
Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in Portuguese in 13 different primary health care units in both rural and urban environments. A sociodemographic questionnaire and two validated instruments, "Medical Term Recognition Test" and "Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities," were applied. The last value of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the number of chronic medications were collected from clinical records. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were performed as well as multivariable linear regression to assess the association between HL and adherence to therapy.
Key results: Participants (n = 354) were on average age 63.67 ± 10.39 years, 57.1% male and 42.9% female, 68.4% with inadequate HL and an average HbA1c of 7 ± 1.18%. Better HL was correlated with higher adherence to the total of self-care activities, nonpharmacological therapy, and foot care. In multivariable linear regression analyses, better HL (β = 0.176, p = .003), less than minimum wage (β = -0.197, p = .001) and insulin therapy (β = 0.272, p = .001) were independently associated with increased adherence to overall self-care activities.
Conclusion: In a representative sample of people with T2DM in Portugal, HL was a key factor for greater adherence to demanding self-care activities. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e194-e203.].
{"title":"Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal.","authors":"Simone Rodrigues, Ana Isabel Patrício, Cátia Cristina, Flávia Fernandes, Gisela Marcelino Santos, Inês Antunes, Inês Pintalhão, Marília Ribeiro, Rita Lopes, Silvana Moreira, Sofia A Oliveira, Susana Pereira Costa, Susete Simões, Tatiana Carvalho Nunes, Luiz Miguel Santiago, Inês Rosendo","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240625-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240625-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapy adherence is a key factor in the control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Optimal self-care requires skills in health literacy (HL).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the relationship between HL and adherence to therapy and to understand the possible influence of other sociodemographic and disease variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in Portuguese in 13 different primary health care units in both rural and urban environments. A sociodemographic questionnaire and two validated instruments, \"Medical Term Recognition Test\" and \"Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities,\" were applied. The last value of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the number of chronic medications were collected from clinical records. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were performed as well as multivariable linear regression to assess the association between HL and adherence to therapy.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Participants (n = 354) were on average age 63.67 ± 10.39 years, 57.1% male and 42.9% female, 68.4% with inadequate HL and an average HbA1c of 7 ± 1.18%. Better HL was correlated with higher adherence to the total of self-care activities, nonpharmacological therapy, and foot care. In multivariable linear regression analyses, better HL (<i>β</i> = 0.176, <i>p</i> = .003), less than minimum wage (β = -0.197, <i>p</i> = .001) and insulin therapy (<i>β</i> = 0.272, <i>p</i> = .001) were independently associated with increased adherence to overall self-care activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a representative sample of people with T2DM in Portugal, HL was a key factor for greater adherence to demanding self-care activities. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e194-e203.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e194-e203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610626/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-12-06DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240723-01
Jennifer A Manganello, Kimberly F Colvin, Molly Hadley, Kelsey O'Brien
Background: Young adults face a number of health concerns and are typically beginning to manage their health on their own. At the same time, this age group is more connected to digital technology than ever before, and studies show that young adults can struggle with digital health literacy skills.
Objective: The online Get Health'e' Program consists of six modules addressing digital health literacy skills, including topics such as internet searches and social media. This study evaluates the program based on a usability and pilot study.
Methods: Recruited participants ranged in age from 18 to 24 years and were predominantly White women. After an eligibility screening, half of the participants were randomly assigned to the program group. All 131 participants were administered two surveys, 2 weeks apart; the program group had access to the program for that week. Survey questions included demographics, the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), and six sets of five multiple-choice questions assessing digital health knowledge.
Key results: Both groups showed an improvement of 1.0 points on the eHEALS scale, but a repeated measures analysis comparing scores for the program and control groups indicated no significant difference in score improvement between the two groups, F(1, 129) = 0.003, p = .96. The program group had an average improvement in quiz scores (from pre to post) from 1.6 to 2.3 which was better than score improvement in the control group across the six modules. The majority of participants in the program group found the program to be useful (67.2%) and informative (59.4%), and 93.8% said they would recommend it to someone they know.
Conclusions: The Get Health'e' program was well received by participants and led to an increase in digital health knowledge. Programs like this have the potential to raise awareness among youth about how to access and evaluate health information online. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e224-e235.].
{"title":"Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.","authors":"Jennifer A Manganello, Kimberly F Colvin, Molly Hadley, Kelsey O'Brien","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240723-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240723-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young adults face a number of health concerns and are typically beginning to manage their health on their own. At the same time, this age group is more connected to digital technology than ever before, and studies show that young adults can struggle with digital health literacy skills.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The online Get Health'e' Program consists of six modules addressing digital health literacy skills, including topics such as internet searches and social media. This study evaluates the program based on a usability and pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recruited participants ranged in age from 18 to 24 years and were predominantly White women. After an eligibility screening, half of the participants were randomly assigned to the program group. All 131 participants were administered two surveys, 2 weeks apart; the program group had access to the program for that week. Survey questions included demographics, the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), and six sets of five multiple-choice questions assessing digital health knowledge.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Both groups showed an improvement of 1.0 points on the eHEALS scale, but a repeated measures analysis comparing scores for the program and control groups indicated no significant difference in score improvement between the two groups, <i>F</i>(1, 129) = 0.003, <i>p</i> = .96. The program group had an average improvement in quiz scores (from pre to post) from 1.6 to 2.3 which was better than score improvement in the control group across the six modules. The majority of participants in the program group found the program to be useful (67.2%) and informative (59.4%), and 93.8% said they would recommend it to someone they know.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Get Health'e' program was well received by participants and led to an increase in digital health knowledge. Programs like this have the potential to raise awareness among youth about how to access and evaluate health information online. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e224-e235.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e224-e235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623233/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142789698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240702-01
Amanda S Mixon, Kathryn Goggins, Samuel Nwosu, Yaping Shi, Jonathan S Schildcrout, Kenneth A Wallston, Gabriela Leon-Perez, Frank E Harrell, Susan P Bell, Lindsay S Mayberry, Eduard E Vasilevskis, John F Schnelle, Russell L Rothman, Sunil Kripalani
Background: The relative contributions of common patient-reported social determinants of health on 30- and 90-day post-discharge outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unclear.
Objective: The aim of this article is to examine the independent associations of social determinants with readmission or death, accounting for medical history.
Methods: Participants included adults who were hospitalized with ACS at an academic medical center. Domains measured were social support, health literacy/numeracy, and socioeconomic status (SES) (including education and difficulty paying bills). We employed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to study associations with time to all-cause readmission or death, up to 30 or 90 days after discharge, and adjusted for demographics and medical history (prior admissions and Elixhauser comorbidity index).
Key results: Among 1,168 patients with ACS and no history of heart failure, more prior admissions, and higher comorbidity index (the medical history domain) were associated with higher rates of 30- and 90-day readmission or death (domain p values <.01 and <.0001, respectively). The social support domain was not associated with outcomes. Higher health literacy and numeracy were associated with lower rates of 30- and 90-day readmission or death (domain p values .016 and .002, respectively). Higher education and less difficulty paying bills (the SES domain) was marginally associated with lower rates of 90-day readmission or death (domain, p = .052).
Conclusions: In addition to medical history, the domain of health literacy and numeracy was independently associated with readmission or death of patients with ACS during the 90 days after hospital discharge. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e212-e223.].
{"title":"Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Amanda S Mixon, Kathryn Goggins, Samuel Nwosu, Yaping Shi, Jonathan S Schildcrout, Kenneth A Wallston, Gabriela Leon-Perez, Frank E Harrell, Susan P Bell, Lindsay S Mayberry, Eduard E Vasilevskis, John F Schnelle, Russell L Rothman, Sunil Kripalani","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240702-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240702-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative contributions of common patient-reported social determinants of health on 30- and 90-day post-discharge outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this article is to examine the independent associations of social determinants with readmission or death, accounting for medical history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included adults who were hospitalized with ACS at an academic medical center. Domains measured were social support, health literacy/numeracy, and socioeconomic status (SES) (including education and difficulty paying bills). We employed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to study associations with time to all-cause readmission or death, up to 30 or 90 days after discharge, and adjusted for demographics and medical history (prior admissions and Elixhauser comorbidity index).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Among 1,168 patients with ACS and no history of heart failure, more prior admissions, and higher comorbidity index (the medical history domain) were associated with higher rates of 30- and 90-day readmission or death (domain <i>p</i> values <.01 and <.0001, respectively). The social support domain was not associated with outcomes. Higher health literacy and numeracy were associated with lower rates of 30- and 90-day readmission or death (domain <i>p</i> values .016 and .002, respectively). Higher education and less difficulty paying bills (the SES domain) was marginally associated with lower rates of 90-day readmission or death (domain, <i>p</i> = .052).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to medical history, the domain of health literacy and numeracy was independently associated with readmission or death of patients with ACS during the 90 days after hospital discharge. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e212-e223.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e212-e223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-12-06DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240730-01
Jacqueline Posselt, Jonas Lander, Marie-Luise Dierks
Background: The lack of therapeutic treatment options for depressive disorders increases the relevance of digital interventions for patients and general practitioners (GPs), particularly to bridge waiting times. However, patients may require adequate (digital) health literacy (HL) to partake in such interventions.
Objective: This study contrasts expected benefits and risks of digital mental health interventions, specifically digital therapeutics on prescription (DTx), among GPs and patients with depression according to HL dimensions (access, understanding, appraisal, and application) and patients' personal determinants.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled GPs (n = 17) and patients with mild or moderate depression (n = 17) in Germany. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Key results: DTx include benefits to access health information and promote HL as DTx can improve understanding of health content and foster self-management skills. But DTx also implies risks for routine care distribution and creates new media barriers. During waiting times patients appraise DTx for themselves as more positive than GPs expect. However, digital- and disease-specific challenges such as non-commitment, listlessness or lethargy appear to hinder the use of DTx in practical situations. While GPs were not convinced about the digital skills of their patients, patients raised concerns that depressive symptoms may inhibit them from actual use.
Conclusion: In the context of DTx for depressive disorders, patients' mental health needs are seldom noticed and rarely promoted. To foster (digital) HL, DTx should be comprehensively embedded in supply situations. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e236-e245.].
{"title":"Health Literacy Promotion and Digital Interventions for Depressive Disorders.","authors":"Jacqueline Posselt, Jonas Lander, Marie-Luise Dierks","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240730-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240730-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of therapeutic treatment options for depressive disorders increases the relevance of digital interventions for patients and general practitioners (GPs), particularly to bridge waiting times. However, patients may require adequate (digital) health literacy (HL) to partake in such interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study contrasts expected benefits and risks of digital mental health interventions, specifically digital therapeutics on prescription (DTx), among GPs and patients with depression according to HL dimensions (access, understanding, appraisal, and application) and patients' personal determinants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled GPs (<i>n</i> = 17) and patients with mild or moderate depression (<i>n</i> = 17) in Germany. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>DTx include benefits to access health information and promote HL as DTx can improve understanding of health content and foster self-management skills. But DTx also implies risks for routine care distribution and creates new media barriers. During waiting times patients appraise DTx for themselves as more positive than GPs expect. However, digital- and disease-specific challenges such as non-commitment, listlessness or lethargy appear to hinder the use of DTx in practical situations. While GPs were not convinced about the digital skills of their patients, patients raised concerns that depressive symptoms may inhibit them from actual use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of DTx for depressive disorders, patients' mental health needs are seldom noticed and rarely promoted. To foster (digital) HL, DTx should be comprehensively embedded in supply situations. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e236-e245.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e236-e245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623232/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142789700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240618-01
Terry Davis, Connie Arnold, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, Candice Myers, Kara D Denstel, Emily F Mire, Christoph Höchsmann, John Apolzan, Peter T Katzmarzyk
Background: Low income and low health literacy are associated with poorer health knowledge, health behaviors and poor health outcomes. The effectiveness of health literacy-directed weight loss treatment interventions in primary care clinics is lacking.
Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana ([PROPEL]) to test the effectiveness of a 24-month, patient-centered, literacy-directed obesity treatment program delivered within primary care in an underserved population. This study reports the association between health literacy and program effectiveness, examining potential correlates of weight loss related to patient adherence to the program.
Methods: We randomly assigned 18 clinics to usual care (UC) or a health literacy-directed lifestyle intervention (HLI). The primary outcome was percent weight loss at 24 months.
Key results: Of 803 adult participants (84% women; 67% Black), 31% had limited health literacy. Patients in UC lost an average of 0.44%of their enrollment weight after 24 months. Those with adequate literacy lost 0.57% and those with limited literacy lost 0.30%, which was not significantly different. The HLI patient group lost an average of 4.9% of their enrollment weight. Those with adequate literacy lost 5.2% and those with limited literacy, 4.7%, which was not significantly different. The advantage of adequate health literacy was consistent across the 24-month study period, though not significant. Patients in the HLI group with adequate health literacy had greater percent weight loss by a margin of 0.50 ± 0.75 (p = .50), while the UC margin was 0.27 ± 0.84 (p = .74). The percent weight loss difference between HLI and UC groups was 4.6 ± 0.8 (p < .001) among patients with adequate health literacy and 4.4 ± 1.0 (p < .001) among patients with limited health literacy. The difference in percent weight loss between the HLI and UC groups was 0.2 ± 1.1 (p = .84) higher for adequate literacy patients.
Conclusions: A health literacy directed health coaching intervention in community clinics led to significant weight loss over 24 months but did not vary by level of patient health literacy. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e204-e211.].
{"title":"Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics.","authors":"Terry Davis, Connie Arnold, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, Candice Myers, Kara D Denstel, Emily F Mire, Christoph Höchsmann, John Apolzan, Peter T Katzmarzyk","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240618-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240618-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low income and low health literacy are associated with poorer health knowledge, health behaviors and poor health outcomes. The effectiveness of health literacy-directed weight loss treatment interventions in primary care clinics is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana ([PROPEL]) to test the effectiveness of a 24-month, patient-centered, literacy-directed obesity treatment program delivered within primary care in an underserved population. This study reports the association between health literacy and program effectiveness, examining potential correlates of weight loss related to patient adherence to the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 18 clinics to usual care (UC) or a health literacy-directed lifestyle intervention (HLI). The primary outcome was percent weight loss at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of 803 adult participants (84% women; 67% Black), 31% had limited health literacy. Patients in UC lost an average of 0.44%of their enrollment weight after 24 months. Those with adequate literacy lost 0.57% and those with limited literacy lost 0.30%, which was not significantly different. The HLI patient group lost an average of 4.9% of their enrollment weight. Those with adequate literacy lost 5.2% and those with limited literacy, 4.7%, which was not significantly different. The advantage of adequate health literacy was consistent across the 24-month study period, though not significant. Patients in the HLI group with adequate health literacy had greater percent weight loss by a margin of 0.50 ± 0.75 (<i>p</i> = .50), while the UC margin was 0.27 ± 0.84 (<i>p</i> = .74). The percent weight loss difference between HLI and UC groups was 4.6 ± 0.8 (<i>p</i> < .001) among patients with adequate health literacy and 4.4 ± 1.0 (<i>p</i> < .001) among patients with limited health literacy. The difference in percent weight loss between the HLI and UC groups was 0.2 ± 1.1 (<i>p</i> = .84) higher for adequate literacy patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A health literacy directed health coaching intervention in community clinics led to significant weight loss over 24 months but did not vary by level of patient health literacy. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e204-e211.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e204-e211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540448/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-05DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240613-04
Lindsay Rosenfeld, Vanessa Watts Simonds
{"title":"Six-Word Memoirs of a Mentor.","authors":"Lindsay Rosenfeld, Vanessa Watts Simonds","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240613-04","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240613-04","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 3","pages":"e124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230639/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142584567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240819-03
Yui Yumiya, Aya Goto, Tsuneo Konta
Background: In Japan, the doctor-patient relationship has traditionally been characterized by a power imbalance that may contribute to communication gaps. To date, however, the link between patients' health literacy levels and their understanding of doctors' explanations of medical conditions and treatment has yet to be fully examined in Japan.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between patients' health literacy level and their understanding of doctors' explanations.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study analyzing data derived from 11,217 questionnaires collected in July 2021 from participants of the Yamagata Study, a community-based cohort study implemented by Yamagata University since 2009.
Key results: The results showed lower health literacy was associated with poorer understanding of physicians' explanations, adjusting for potential confounding factors. In addition to low health literacy, factors associated with lower comprehension were being male, not having a regular family doctor, and having lower self-perceived levels of health and happiness.
Conclusions: The results suggest that health care professionals need to communicate with patients according to their health literacy level and ensure they fully understand their medical condition and treatment. Medical providers need to create a better health-literate environment to enable patients and families to make decisions by themselves. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(3):e175-e183.].
背景:在日本,医患关系的传统特点是权力不平衡,这可能会造成沟通障碍。然而,迄今为止,日本尚未对患者的健康知识水平与他们对医生关于病情和治疗的解释的理解之间的联系进行全面研究:本研究旨在调查患者的健康知识水平与他们对医生解释的理解之间的关系:这是一项横断面研究,分析了山形大学自2009年起实施的一项社区队列研究 "山形研究 "参与者于2021年7月收集的11217份问卷中的数据:结果表明,在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,较低的健康素养与较少理解医生的解释有关。除了健康素养低之外,与理解能力较差相关的因素还有男性、没有固定的家庭医生以及自我感觉健康和幸福水平较低:研究结果表明,医护人员需要根据患者的健康素养水平与他们进行沟通,确保他们完全理解自己的病情和治疗方法。医疗服务提供者需要创造一个更好的健康素养环境,让患者和家属能够自己做出决定。[HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(3):e175-e183.]。
{"title":"Association Between Health Literacy and Understanding of Doctors' Explanations: The Yamagata Study.","authors":"Yui Yumiya, Aya Goto, Tsuneo Konta","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240819-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20240819-03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, the doctor-patient relationship has traditionally been characterized by a power imbalance that may contribute to communication gaps. To date, however, the link between patients' health literacy levels and their understanding of doctors' explanations of medical conditions and treatment has yet to be fully examined in Japan.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between patients' health literacy level and their understanding of doctors' explanations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study analyzing data derived from 11,217 questionnaires collected in July 2021 from participants of the Yamagata Study, a community-based cohort study implemented by Yamagata University since 2009.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The results showed lower health literacy was associated with poorer understanding of physicians' explanations, adjusting for potential confounding factors. In addition to low health literacy, factors associated with lower comprehension were being male, not having a regular family doctor, and having lower self-perceived levels of health and happiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that health care professionals need to communicate with patients according to their health literacy level and ensure they fully understand their medical condition and treatment. Medical providers need to create a better health-literate environment to enable patients and families to make decisions by themselves. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(3):e175-e183.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 3","pages":"e175-e183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240722-01
Andreivna Kharenine Serbim, Julie Ayre, Lisiane Manganelli Girardi Paskulin, Don Nutbeam, Danielle Muscat
To address current gaps in health literacy research and practice in low-resource settings, the 'Alfa-Health Program' was designed to improve health literacy in older adults who live in a community dwelling in a socioeconomically disadvantaged community in North-East Brazil. In this longitudinal qualitative study, participants were interviewed before and after participating in the group-based program that was delivered November 2017 to December 2017 in the Primary Care Health Unit. Semi-structured interviews were guided by a previously validated health literacy instrument, translated and adapted for use in Brazil. Data was analyzed using Framework analysis. Of the 21 participants, the majority were age 60 to 69 years with a median of 4-years of school education. Our analysis identified self-reported improvements in health knowledge, behaviors, and skills that matched program content and indicated that participants were supported to manage their health conditions more autonomously. Other themes reflect the distributed nature of health literacy and the potential for group-based health literacy programs to facilitate feelings of social support and cohesion through co-learning. However, age-related deficits in memory and external and structural factors remained important barriers to program participation. This study provides insight into developing health literacy in low-resource settings with older adults, where health literacy is compounded by social determinants and cognitive and sensory changes that contribute to health disparities. Although the targeted Alfa Health Program addresses calls to ensure that priority is proportionate to need by reaching and engaging population groups who are disproportionately affected by low health literacy, further work is needed to adapt the program for people who are unable to read or write. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(3):e140-e150.].
为解决目前在低资源环境中健康素养研究和实践方面存在的差距,"阿尔法健康计划 "旨在提高巴西东北部一个社会经济条件较差社区中老年人的健康素养。在这项纵向定性研究中,参与者在参加 2017 年 11 月至 2017 年 12 月在初级保健单位开展的小组项目前后接受了访谈。半结构式访谈以之前经过验证的健康素养工具为指导,该工具经过翻译和改编,可在巴西使用。数据采用框架分析法进行分析。在 21 名参与者中,大多数年龄在 60 至 69 岁之间,受教育年限中位数为 4 年。我们的分析发现,参与者自我报告的健康知识、行为和技能方面的改善与计划内容相吻合,并表明他们得到了支持,能够更加自主地管理自己的健康状况。其他主题反映了健康素养的分布性质,以及以小组为基础的健康素养计划通过共同学习促进社会支持感和凝聚力的潜力。然而,与年龄有关的记忆缺陷以及外部和结构性因素仍然是参与计划的重要障碍。这项研究为在资源匮乏的环境中培养老年人的健康素养提供了启示,因为在这些环境中,社会决定因素以及认知和感官的变化会加剧健康素养方面的差异。尽管有针对性的阿尔法健康计划响应了确保优先顺序与需求相称的呼吁,接触到了受健康素养低影响过大的人群,并让他们参与其中,但仍需进一步努力,使该计划适用于无法阅读或书写的人群。[HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(3):e140-e150]。
{"title":"Qualitative Evaluation of a Health Literacy Program for Older Adults Who Live in a Community Dwelling in Brazil.","authors":"Andreivna Kharenine Serbim, Julie Ayre, Lisiane Manganelli Girardi Paskulin, Don Nutbeam, Danielle Muscat","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240722-01","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240722-01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To address current gaps in health literacy research and practice in low-resource settings, the 'Alfa-Health Program' was designed to improve health literacy in older adults who live in a community dwelling in a socioeconomically disadvantaged community in North-East Brazil. In this longitudinal qualitative study, participants were interviewed before and after participating in the group-based program that was delivered November 2017 to December 2017 in the Primary Care Health Unit. Semi-structured interviews were guided by a previously validated health literacy instrument, translated and adapted for use in Brazil. Data was analyzed using Framework analysis. Of the 21 participants, the majority were age 60 to 69 years with a median of 4-years of school education. Our analysis identified self-reported improvements in health knowledge, behaviors, and skills that matched program content and indicated that participants were supported to manage their health conditions more autonomously. Other themes reflect the distributed nature of health literacy and the potential for group-based health literacy programs to facilitate feelings of social support and cohesion through co-learning. However, age-related deficits in memory and external and structural factors remained important barriers to program participation. This study provides insight into developing health literacy in low-resource settings with older adults, where health literacy is compounded by social determinants and cognitive and sensory changes that contribute to health disparities. Although the targeted Alfa Health Program addresses calls to ensure that priority is proportionate to need by reaching and engaging population groups who are disproportionately affected by low health literacy, further work is needed to adapt the program for people who are unable to read or write. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(3):e140-e150.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 3","pages":"e140-e150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141971977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20240717-02
Kristine Sørensen
{"title":"My Passion for Health Literacy.","authors":"Kristine Sørensen","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240717-02","DOIUrl":"10.3928/24748307-20240717-02","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 3","pages":"e128-e129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141971976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}