Cost-effectiveness of extended-release injectable naltrexone among incarcerated persons with opioid use disorder before release from prison versus after release

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108835
Ali Jalali , Philip J. Jeng , Daniel Polsky , Sabrina Poole , Yi-Chien Ku , George E. Woody , Sean M. Murphy
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of extended-release injectable naltrexone among incarcerated persons with opioid use disorder before release from prison versus after release","authors":"Ali Jalali ,&nbsp;Philip J. Jeng ,&nbsp;Daniel Polsky ,&nbsp;Sabrina Poole ,&nbsp;Yi-Chien Ku ,&nbsp;George E. Woody ,&nbsp;Sean M. Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is highly prevalent among incarcerated populations<span><span>, and the risk of fatal overdose following release from prison is substantial. Despite efficacy, few correctional facilities provide evidence-based addiction treatment. Extended-release injectable </span>naltrexone (XR-NTX) administered prior to release from incarceration may improve health and economic outcomes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of XR-NTX before release from prison (</span><em>n</em> = 38) vs. XR-NTX referral after release (<em>n</em><span> = 48) of incarcerated participants with OUD, both groups continuing treatment at a community addiction treatment center. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) assessed the cost-effectiveness of XR-NTX before release compared to referral after release for three stakeholder perspectives at 12- and 24-week periods: state policymaker, health care sector, and societal. Effectiveness measures included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and abstinent years from opioids. In addition, we categorized resources as OUD-related and non-OUD-related medical care, state transfer payments, and other societal costs (productivity, criminal justice resources, etc.).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed an association between XR-NTX and greater OUD-related costs and total costs from the state policymaker perspective. QALYs gained were positive but statistically insignificant between arms; however, results showed XR-NTX had an estimated 15.5 more days of opioid abstinence over 24 weeks and statistically significant at a 95 % confidence level based on the distribution of bootstrapped samples. We found that estimated ICERs to be &gt; $500,000 per QALY for all stakeholder perspectives. For the abstinent-year effectiveness measure, we found XR-NTX before release to be cost-effective at a 95 % confidence level for willingness-to-pay values &gt;$49,000 per abstinent-year, across all perspectives.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>XR-NTX administered to persons who are incarcerated with OUD before release may provide value for stakeholders and bridge a well-known treatment gap for this vulnerable population. Lower than expected participant engagement and missing data limit our results, and study outcomes may be sensitive to methods that address missing data if replicated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108835"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is highly prevalent among incarcerated populations, and the risk of fatal overdose following release from prison is substantial. Despite efficacy, few correctional facilities provide evidence-based addiction treatment. Extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) administered prior to release from incarceration may improve health and economic outcomes.

Methods

We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of XR-NTX before release from prison (n = 38) vs. XR-NTX referral after release (n = 48) of incarcerated participants with OUD, both groups continuing treatment at a community addiction treatment center. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) assessed the cost-effectiveness of XR-NTX before release compared to referral after release for three stakeholder perspectives at 12- and 24-week periods: state policymaker, health care sector, and societal. Effectiveness measures included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and abstinent years from opioids. In addition, we categorized resources as OUD-related and non-OUD-related medical care, state transfer payments, and other societal costs (productivity, criminal justice resources, etc.).

Results

Results showed an association between XR-NTX and greater OUD-related costs and total costs from the state policymaker perspective. QALYs gained were positive but statistically insignificant between arms; however, results showed XR-NTX had an estimated 15.5 more days of opioid abstinence over 24 weeks and statistically significant at a 95 % confidence level based on the distribution of bootstrapped samples. We found that estimated ICERs to be > $500,000 per QALY for all stakeholder perspectives. For the abstinent-year effectiveness measure, we found XR-NTX before release to be cost-effective at a 95 % confidence level for willingness-to-pay values >$49,000 per abstinent-year, across all perspectives.

Conclusions

XR-NTX administered to persons who are incarcerated with OUD before release may provide value for stakeholders and bridge a well-known treatment gap for this vulnerable population. Lower than expected participant engagement and missing data limit our results, and study outcomes may be sensitive to methods that address missing data if replicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有阿片类药物使用障碍的被监禁者中,缓释注射纳曲酮在释放前与释放后的成本效益。
引言:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)在被监禁人群中非常普遍,出狱后服用过量药物致死的风险很大。尽管疗效显著,但很少有惩教机构提供循证成瘾治疗。在监禁释放前给予的缓释注射纳曲酮(XR-NTX)可以改善健康和经济结果。方法:我们进行了一项经济评估和一项随机对照试验,测试XR-NTX在出狱前(n=38)与XR-NTX释放后(n=48)被监禁的OUD参与者的有效性,这两组参与者都在社区成瘾治疗中心继续治疗。增量成本效益比(ICER)评估了XR-NTX在发布前与发布后转诊的成本效益,包括12周和24周的三个利益相关者视角:州政策制定者、医疗保健部门和社会。有效性指标包括质量调整生命年(QALYs)和阿片类药物戒断年数。此外,我们将资源分类为与OUD相关和非OUD相关的医疗保健、国家转移支付和其他社会成本(生产力、刑事司法资源等)。结果:从国家决策者的角度来看,XR-NTX与更大的OUD相关成本和总成本之间存在关联。获得的QALYs是阳性的,但在两组之间统计学上不显著;然而,结果显示,XR-NTX在24周内估计有15.5天的阿片类药物戒断时间,根据自举样本的分布,在95%的置信水平下具有统计学意义。我们发现估计的ICER为>$对于所有利益相关者的观点,每个QALY 500000。对于禁欲年的有效性测量,我们发现XR-NTX在发布前具有成本效益,在95%的置信水平下,支付意愿值>$从各个角度来看,每年禁欲49000人。结论:释放前给因OUD而被监禁的人服用XR-NTX可能会为利益相关者提供价值,并弥合这一弱势群体众所周知的治疗差距。参与者参与度低于预期和数据缺失限制了我们的结果,如果重复,研究结果可能对解决数据缺失的方法敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1