Personality, Attitudes, and Behaviors Predicting Perceived Benefit in Online Support Groups for Caregivers: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.2196/36167
Athena Milios, Ting Xiong, Karen McEwan, Patrick McGrath
{"title":"Personality, Attitudes, and Behaviors Predicting Perceived Benefit in Online Support Groups for Caregivers: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Athena Milios,&nbsp;Ting Xiong,&nbsp;Karen McEwan,&nbsp;Patrick McGrath","doi":"10.2196/36167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online support groups (OSGs) are distance-delivered, easily accessible health interventions offering emotional, informational, and experience-based support and companionship or network support for caregivers managing chronic mental and physical health conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the relative contribution of extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, positive attitudes toward OSGs on social networking sites, and typical past OSG use patterns in predicting perceived OSG benefit in an OSG for parents and caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods, longitudinal design was used to collect data from 81 parents across Canada. Attitudes toward OSGs and typical OSG use patterns were assessed using the author-developed Attitudes Toward OSGs subscale (eg, \"Online support groups are a place to get and give emotional support\") and Past Behaviors in OSGs subscale (eg, \"How often would you typically comment on posts?\") administered at baseline-before OSG membership. The personality traits of extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism were assessed at baseline using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Perceived OSG benefit was assessed using the author-developed Perceived OSG Benefit scale (eg, \"Overall, did you feel supported by other members in this group?\"), administered 2 months after the initiation of OSG membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A hierarchical regression analysis found that extraversion was the only variable that significantly predicted perceived OSG benefit (R<sup>2</sup>=0.125; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The key suggestions for improving future OSGs were facilitating more in-depth, customized, and interactive content in OSGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":" ","pages":"e36167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9437785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/36167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online support groups (OSGs) are distance-delivered, easily accessible health interventions offering emotional, informational, and experience-based support and companionship or network support for caregivers managing chronic mental and physical health conditions.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the relative contribution of extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, positive attitudes toward OSGs on social networking sites, and typical past OSG use patterns in predicting perceived OSG benefit in an OSG for parents and caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Methods: A mixed methods, longitudinal design was used to collect data from 81 parents across Canada. Attitudes toward OSGs and typical OSG use patterns were assessed using the author-developed Attitudes Toward OSGs subscale (eg, "Online support groups are a place to get and give emotional support") and Past Behaviors in OSGs subscale (eg, "How often would you typically comment on posts?") administered at baseline-before OSG membership. The personality traits of extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism were assessed at baseline using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Perceived OSG benefit was assessed using the author-developed Perceived OSG Benefit scale (eg, "Overall, did you feel supported by other members in this group?"), administered 2 months after the initiation of OSG membership.

Results: A hierarchical regression analysis found that extraversion was the only variable that significantly predicted perceived OSG benefit (R2=0.125; P<.001).

Conclusions: The key suggestions for improving future OSGs were facilitating more in-depth, customized, and interactive content in OSGs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格、态度和行为预测在线支持团体对照顾者的感知利益:混合方法研究。
背景:在线支持小组(osg)是远程提供、易于获取的健康干预措施,为管理慢性精神和身体健康状况的护理人员提供情感、信息和基于经验的支持以及陪伴或网络支持。目的:本研究旨在探讨外向性、亲和性、神经质、社交网站上对OSG的积极态度和过去典型的OSG使用模式在预测神经发育障碍儿童父母和照顾者在OSG中感知的OSG收益中的相对贡献。方法:采用混合方法,纵向设计,收集来自加拿大各地81名家长的数据。对OSG的态度和典型的OSG使用模式的评估使用作者开发的OSG态度子量表(例如,“在线支持小组是获得和提供情感支持的地方”)和OSG子量表中的过去行为(例如,“你通常多久评论一次帖子?”)在OSG成员之前的基线进行管理。在基线上使用十项人格量表评估外向性、宜人性和神经质的人格特征。OSG的感知效益使用作者开发的感知OSG效益量表进行评估(例如,“总体而言,你是否感到得到了该组其他成员的支持?”),在加入OSG 2个月后进行评估。结果:层次回归分析发现,外向性是唯一能显著预测OSG获益的变量(R2=0.125;结论:改进未来osg的关键建议是在osg中促进更深入、定制和互动的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of Attached File Formats on the Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the Japanese National Nursing Examination: Evaluation Study. Exploring Educators' Perceptions and Experiences of Online Teaching to Foster Caring Profession Students' Development of Virtual Caring Skills: Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study. Unobtrusive Nighttime Movement Monitoring to Support Nursing Home Continence Care: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. Assessing Visitor Expectations of AI Nursing Robots in Hospital Settings: Cross-Sectional Study Using the Kano Model. Calculating Optimal Patient to Nursing Capacity: Comparative Analysis of Traditional and New Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1