Development and Validation of the Self-Rating Suicide Risk Screening Questionnaire.

IF 1.3 Omega Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-13 DOI:10.1177/00302228221119029
Hwa Jung Lee, Dong Hun Lee, Hong Jin Jeon, Deok Hee Lee, Vidal Yook, Ji Yeol Jeon
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Self-Rating Suicide Risk Screening Questionnaire.","authors":"Hwa Jung Lee, Dong Hun Lee, Hong Jin Jeon, Deok Hee Lee, Vidal Yook, Ji Yeol Jeon","doi":"10.1177/00302228221119029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since suicide is one of the major health problems worldwide, the goal of the present study is to develop a psychometrically sound suicide risk screening tool named Suicide Screening Questionnaire- Self-Rating (SSQ-SR) to quantify the risk of suicidal behavior. The development process includes item generation, item revision and refinement, and validation. A total sample of 2,238 adults in South Korea was used for analysis. The results of factor analysis showed that the SSQ-SR, containing 25 items, supported a three-factor model: \"Situational factors,\" \"Negative self-perceptions and mental health factors,\" and \"Suicidal thoughts and behaviors.\" Also, SSQ-SR showed satisfying internal consistency, concurrent validity and discriminant validity. Lastly, the results of ROC analysis showed a cut-off point of 33.5 for the low-risk group and 36.5 for the high-risk group. Considering these results, the current results demonstrate the SSQ-SR is a valid scale and therefore can contribute to future suicide-related studies and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"1250-1278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221119029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since suicide is one of the major health problems worldwide, the goal of the present study is to develop a psychometrically sound suicide risk screening tool named Suicide Screening Questionnaire- Self-Rating (SSQ-SR) to quantify the risk of suicidal behavior. The development process includes item generation, item revision and refinement, and validation. A total sample of 2,238 adults in South Korea was used for analysis. The results of factor analysis showed that the SSQ-SR, containing 25 items, supported a three-factor model: "Situational factors," "Negative self-perceptions and mental health factors," and "Suicidal thoughts and behaviors." Also, SSQ-SR showed satisfying internal consistency, concurrent validity and discriminant validity. Lastly, the results of ROC analysis showed a cut-off point of 33.5 for the low-risk group and 36.5 for the high-risk group. Considering these results, the current results demonstrate the SSQ-SR is a valid scale and therefore can contribute to future suicide-related studies and prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀风险自评筛查问卷的开发与验证。
自杀是世界范围内的主要健康问题之一,因此本研究旨在开发一种心理测量学上可靠的自杀风险筛查工具,名为自杀筛查问卷-自我评分(SSQ-SR),用于量化自杀行为的风险。开发过程包括项目生成、项目修订和完善以及验证。分析使用了 2 238 个韩国成年人样本。因子分析结果显示,SSQ-SR 包含 25 个项目,支持三因子模型:"情境因素"、"消极自我认知和心理健康因素 "以及 "自杀想法和行为"。此外,SSQ-SR 还显示出令人满意的内部一致性、并发效度和判别效度。最后,ROC 分析结果显示,低风险组的临界点为 33.5,高风险组的临界点为 36.5。考虑到这些结果,目前的研究结果表明 SSQ-SR 是一个有效的量表,因此可以为未来的自杀相关研究和预防工作做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of "Intensive Care Nurses" Attitude Scale Toward Brain Death and Organ Transplantation. Find Meaning and Help: The Lived Experiences and Support Needs of Iranian Muslim Husbands of Women Undergoing Mastectomy From Diagnosis to the End of Life. The Reliability and Validity Study of Turkish Version of the Death Depression Scale-Revised Among Nurses. Sanctity of Life or God's Command? Investigating Religious Determinants of Attitudes Toward Three Cases of Unnatural Death: Capital Punishment, Abortion, and Euthanasia. Death Preparedness: Development and Initial Validation of the Advance Planning Preparedness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1