Modification of Case-Based Reasoning Similarity Formula to Enhance the Performance of Smart System in Handling the Complaints of in vitro Fertilization Program Patients.

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Healthcare Informatics Research Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-31 DOI:10.4258/hir.2022.28.3.267
Paminto Agung Christianto, Eko Sediyono, Irwan Sembiring
{"title":"Modification of Case-Based Reasoning Similarity Formula to Enhance the Performance of Smart System in Handling the Complaints of in vitro Fertilization Program Patients.","authors":"Paminto Agung Christianto,&nbsp;Eko Sediyono,&nbsp;Irwan Sembiring","doi":"10.4258/hir.2022.28.3.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Eighty percent of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients have high anxiety levels, which influence the success of IVF and drive IVF patients to quickly report any abnormal symptoms. Rapid responses from fertility subspecialist doctors may reduce patients' anxiety levels, but fertility subspecialist doctors' high workload and their patients' worsening health conditions make them unable to handle IVF patients' complaints quickly. Research suggests that smart systems using case-based reasoning (CBR) can help doctors handle patients quickly. However, a prior study reported enhanced accuracy by modifying the CBR similarity formula based on Lin's similarity theory to generate the Chris case-based reasoning (CCBR) similarity formula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were validated through interviews with two fertility subspecialist doctors, interviews with two IVF patients, a questionnaire administered to 17 community members, the relevant literature, and 256 records with data on IVF patients' complaints and how they were handled. An experiment compared the performance of the CBR similarity formula algorithm with the CCBR similarity formula algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A confusion matrix showed that the CCBR similarity formula had an accuracy value of 52.58% and a precision value of 100%. Fertility subspecialist doctors stated that 89.69% of the CCBR similarity formula recommendations were accurate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend applying a combination of the CCBR similarity formula and a minimum reference value of 80% with a CBR smart system for handling IVF patients' complaints. This recommendation for an accurate system produced by the CBR similarity formula may help fertility subspecialist doctors handle IVF patients' complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/8d/hir-2022-28-3-267.PMC9388916.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2022.28.3.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: Eighty percent of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients have high anxiety levels, which influence the success of IVF and drive IVF patients to quickly report any abnormal symptoms. Rapid responses from fertility subspecialist doctors may reduce patients' anxiety levels, but fertility subspecialist doctors' high workload and their patients' worsening health conditions make them unable to handle IVF patients' complaints quickly. Research suggests that smart systems using case-based reasoning (CBR) can help doctors handle patients quickly. However, a prior study reported enhanced accuracy by modifying the CBR similarity formula based on Lin's similarity theory to generate the Chris case-based reasoning (CCBR) similarity formula.

Methods: The data were validated through interviews with two fertility subspecialist doctors, interviews with two IVF patients, a questionnaire administered to 17 community members, the relevant literature, and 256 records with data on IVF patients' complaints and how they were handled. An experiment compared the performance of the CBR similarity formula algorithm with the CCBR similarity formula algorithm.

Results: A confusion matrix showed that the CCBR similarity formula had an accuracy value of 52.58% and a precision value of 100%. Fertility subspecialist doctors stated that 89.69% of the CCBR similarity formula recommendations were accurate.

Conclusions: We recommend applying a combination of the CCBR similarity formula and a minimum reference value of 80% with a CBR smart system for handling IVF patients' complaints. This recommendation for an accurate system produced by the CBR similarity formula may help fertility subspecialist doctors handle IVF patients' complaints.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修改基于案例的推理相似度公式提高智能系统处理体外受精患者投诉的性能
目的:80%的体外受精(IVF)患者存在高焦虑水平,这影响了IVF的成功,并促使IVF患者迅速报告任何异常症状。生育专科医生的快速反应可能会降低患者的焦虑水平,但生育专科医生的高工作量和患者不断恶化的健康状况使他们无法快速处理试管婴儿患者的投诉。研究表明,使用基于案例推理(CBR)的智能系统可以帮助医生快速处理病人。然而,先前的研究报道了通过修改基于Lin相似理论的CBR相似公式来生成Chris case-based reasoning (CCBR)相似公式来提高准确性。方法:通过对2名生育专科医生的访谈、对2名试管婴儿患者的访谈、对17名社区成员的问卷调查、相关文献和256份记录试管婴儿患者投诉及处理方式的数据,对数据进行验证。实验比较了CBR相似度公式算法与CCBR相似度公式算法的性能。结果:混淆矩阵显示,CCBR相似度公式的准确度值为52.58%,准确度值为100%。生育专科医生表示,CCBR相似性公式建议的准确率为89.69%。结论:我们建议将CCBR相似度公式与最低参考值80%结合使用CBR智能系统来处理IVF患者的投诉。这个由CBR相似公式产生的精确系统的建议可以帮助生育专科医生处理试管婴儿患者的投诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Status and Trends of the Digital Healthcare Industry. Technology and Access to Healthcare with Different Scheduling Systems: A Scoping Review. Associations between Nicotine Dependence, Smartphone Usage Patterns, and Expected Compliance with a Smoking Cessation Application among Smokers. ChatGPT Predicts In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality for Sepsis: In-Context Learning with the Korean Sepsis Alliance Database. Data Market-related Issues in the Medical Field: Accelerating Digital Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1