Burden of Pressure Injuries: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2022-06-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Charalampos Siotos, Andrew M Bonett, George Damoulakis, Adan Z Becerra, George Kokosis, Keith Hood, Amir H Dorafshar, Deana S Shenaq
{"title":"Burden of Pressure Injuries: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.","authors":"Charalampos Siotos,&nbsp;Andrew M Bonett,&nbsp;George Damoulakis,&nbsp;Adan Z Becerra,&nbsp;George Kokosis,&nbsp;Keith Hood,&nbsp;Amir H Dorafshar,&nbsp;Deana S Shenaq","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries remain among the most common problems faced by plastic surgeons and comprise a large portion of wound clinic practice. However, little is known about the overall morbidity related to the disease. This research sought to identify the burden related to the diagnosis of pressure injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 to extract information about incidence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) related to pressure injuries from 1990 to 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to identify changes in the outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A relative though not statistically significantly decrease in the incidence and burden of pressure injuries was observed between 1990 and 2017. Rates of incidence in the US appear higher than other higher socio-demographic index countries. No clinically and statistically significant changes were observed based on age or sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pressure injury incidence and burden have remained relatively stable between 1990 and 2017 with no significant improvement noted. There is room for improvement on a national performance level, and further research is needed regarding inconsistencies in regional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":" ","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275412/pdf/eplasty-22-e19.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries remain among the most common problems faced by plastic surgeons and comprise a large portion of wound clinic practice. However, little is known about the overall morbidity related to the disease. This research sought to identify the burden related to the diagnosis of pressure injuries.

Methods: We used the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 to extract information about incidence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) related to pressure injuries from 1990 to 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to identify changes in the outcomes of interest.

Results: A relative though not statistically significantly decrease in the incidence and burden of pressure injuries was observed between 1990 and 2017. Rates of incidence in the US appear higher than other higher socio-demographic index countries. No clinically and statistically significant changes were observed based on age or sex.

Conclusions: Pressure injury incidence and burden have remained relatively stable between 1990 and 2017 with no significant improvement noted. There is room for improvement on a national performance level, and further research is needed regarding inconsistencies in regional outcomes.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力伤害负担:来自全球疾病负担研究的发现。
背景:压伤仍然是整形外科医生面临的最常见的问题之一,并构成了很大一部分伤口临床实践。然而,人们对与该疾病相关的总体发病率知之甚少。本研究旨在确定与压力损伤诊断相关的负担。方法:我们使用2017年全球疾病负担研究,提取1990年至2017年与压力性损伤相关的发病率和残疾调整生命年(DALYs)信息。描述性统计用于确定感兴趣的结果的变化。结果:1990年至2017年期间,压力性损伤的发生率和负担相对较低,但无统计学意义。美国的发病率似乎高于其他社会人口指数较高的国家。没有观察到基于年龄或性别的临床和统计学上的显著变化。结论:1990 - 2017年,压力性损伤发生率和负担保持相对稳定,无明显改善。在国家绩效水平上还有改进的余地,需要对区域结果的不一致性进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1