Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Word of Caution in Cases of Aberrant Anatomy.

Pub Date : 2022-10-18 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1744154
Maria Ioanna Antonopoulou, Dimitrios K Manatakis
{"title":"Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Word of Caution in Cases of Aberrant Anatomy.","authors":"Maria Ioanna Antonopoulou, Dimitrios K Manatakis","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1744154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction  To avoid vasculobiliary injuries, the Critical View of Safety (CVS) technique is strongly recommended during dissection of the hepatocystic triangle. It entails three basic steps as follows: (1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle of fibrofatty tissue, (2) separation of the lower part of the gallbladder from the cystic plate, so that (3) two and only two structures are seen entering the gallbladder. Case History  In this video vignette, we present the case of an aberrant hepatic artery, coursing subserosally parallel to the gallbladder wall. Despite presumably achieving all three CVS requirements, the surgeon did not proceed to clipping and dividing the two structures, preventing a major vascular injury. Due to its unusually large caliber, the artery was carefully dissected, and multiple smaller branches to the gallbladder were ligated instead, until it was definitively identified entering into the hepatic parenchyma of segments IVb–V. Discussion  The CVS approach was originally conceived as a means for the conclusive recognition of the cystic duct and artery to prevent misidentification errors. However, in such cases of extreme anatomical variations, the CVS may indeed have certain limitations. Therefore the surgeon should always maintain a high degree of suspicion and a low threshold for alternative bail-out options.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578768/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction  To avoid vasculobiliary injuries, the Critical View of Safety (CVS) technique is strongly recommended during dissection of the hepatocystic triangle. It entails three basic steps as follows: (1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle of fibrofatty tissue, (2) separation of the lower part of the gallbladder from the cystic plate, so that (3) two and only two structures are seen entering the gallbladder. Case History  In this video vignette, we present the case of an aberrant hepatic artery, coursing subserosally parallel to the gallbladder wall. Despite presumably achieving all three CVS requirements, the surgeon did not proceed to clipping and dividing the two structures, preventing a major vascular injury. Due to its unusually large caliber, the artery was carefully dissected, and multiple smaller branches to the gallbladder were ligated instead, until it was definitively identified entering into the hepatic parenchyma of segments IVb–V. Discussion  The CVS approach was originally conceived as a means for the conclusive recognition of the cystic duct and artery to prevent misidentification errors. However, in such cases of extreme anatomical variations, the CVS may indeed have certain limitations. Therefore the surgeon should always maintain a high degree of suspicion and a low threshold for alternative bail-out options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
对腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性的批判:对解剖异常病例的警告。
为了避免血管损伤,强烈建议在肝囊三角区解剖时使用安全批判视点技术。它包括以下三个基本步骤:(1)完全清除纤维脂肪组织的肝囊三角,(2)将胆囊下部与胆囊板分离,以便(3)看到两个且只有两个结构进入胆囊。在这段视频中,我们报告了一个异常肝动脉的病例,该动脉在浆膜下与胆囊壁平行。尽管可能达到了所有三个CVS要求,但外科医生没有继续夹持和分割两个结构,以防止主要的血管损伤。由于其异常大的口径,我们仔细地解剖了动脉,并结扎了多个通往胆囊的小分支,直到确定它进入了IVb-V段的肝实质。CVS方法最初被认为是一种结论性识别囊管和动脉的手段,以防止错误识别。然而,在这种极端的解剖变异的情况下,CVS可能确实有一定的局限性。因此,外科医生应始终保持高度的怀疑和低门槛的替代救市方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1