Comparison of skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of two different mandibular advancement methods: conventional technique vs aesthetic approach.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Oral Research Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.26650/eor.2022939871

Hasan Camcı, Farhad Salmanpour

{"title":"Comparison of skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of two different mandibular advancement methods: conventional technique vs aesthetic approach.","authors":"Hasan Camcı, Farhad Salmanpour","doi":"10.26650/eor.2022939871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different mandibular advancement methods on skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue structures through cephalometric measurements.Materials and methods: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different mandibular advancement methods on skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue structures through cephalometric measurements.Results: The mandibular base was observed to move forward significantly in both groups (p<0.05). However, the forward movement of the mandibular base was greater in the TB group than in the EA group (p<0.05). There was no difference in lower incisor protrusion between the two treatment methods. The EA device was found to cause a significant increase in vertical direction parameters (p<0.05).Conclusion: Both methods resulted in Class II malocclusion correction as well as an acceptable occlusion plus profile. The effects of EA were primarily dentoalveolar. In patients with high aesthetic expectations, EA could be an alternative for TB.","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"56 2","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/73/eor-056-096.PMC9377770.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022939871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different mandibular advancement methods on skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue structures through cephalometric measurements.

Materials and methods: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different mandibular advancement methods on skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue structures through cephalometric measurements.

Results: The mandibular base was observed to move forward significantly in both groups (p<0.05). However, the forward movement of the mandibular base was greater in the TB group than in the EA group (p<0.05). There was no difference in lower incisor protrusion between the two treatment methods. The EA device was found to cause a significant increase in vertical direction parameters (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Both methods resulted in Class II malocclusion correction as well as an acceptable occlusion plus profile. The effects of EA were primarily dentoalveolar. In patients with high aesthetic expectations, EA could be an alternative for TB.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

两种不同的下颌骨推进方法对骨骼和牙槽骨的影响比较:传统技术与美学方法。

目的:本研究的目的是比较两种不同的下颌前移方法对骨骼、牙槽牙和软组织结构的影响。材料和方法:本研究的目的是通过头颅测量比较两种不同的下颌前移方法对骨骼、牙槽牙和软组织结构的影响。结果:两组患者的下颌基底均明显前移(p)。结论:两种方法均可矫正II类错颌，并获得可接受的咬合+轮廓。EA的作用主要是牙槽牙。对于审美要求较高的患者，EA可以作为结核病的替代方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊