Short-Term Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Alleviating Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2022-10-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1319165
Punpetch Siriratna, Chompoonuch Ratanasutiranont, Thongsuk Manissorn, Nonthalee Santiniyom, Waree Chira-Adisai
{"title":"Short-Term Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Alleviating Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Punpetch Siriratna,&nbsp;Chompoonuch Ratanasutiranont,&nbsp;Thongsuk Manissorn,&nbsp;Nonthalee Santiniyom,&nbsp;Waree Chira-Adisai","doi":"10.1155/2022/1319165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on pain reduction in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients diagnosed with primary knee OA, with a Kellgren-Lawrence classification of 2-4, were recruited into the study. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: HILT and control. The intervention group received HILT (energy density of 22.39 J/cm2, 562.5 joule/session), while the control group received a sham laser, which was done 2-3 sessions per week for a total of 10 sessions. Both the groups also received the same conservative treatment. The main outcome measures were the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (T-WOMAC) which were evaluated at baseline and immediately after treatment completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the study, the overall analysis showed a significant decrease in VAS and T-WOMAC scores in both the groups; a greater decrease in scores was found in the HILT group than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The between-group comparison also showed a significant difference in VAS, but not in the T-WOMAC score, favouring HILT (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HILT plus conservative treatment can help alleviate pain in patients with knee OA. The findings of the present study could be used in clinical practice to add HILT as another noninvasive treatment option for knee OA. This could be advantageous, particularly for individuals who are at high risk of surgery due to multiple comorbidities or older people. <i>Trial Registration</i>. This clinical trial registration was performed at Clinical.gov (NCT04889885).</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616657/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1319165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on pain reduction in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: Forty-two patients diagnosed with primary knee OA, with a Kellgren-Lawrence classification of 2-4, were recruited into the study. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: HILT and control. The intervention group received HILT (energy density of 22.39 J/cm2, 562.5 joule/session), while the control group received a sham laser, which was done 2-3 sessions per week for a total of 10 sessions. Both the groups also received the same conservative treatment. The main outcome measures were the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (T-WOMAC) which were evaluated at baseline and immediately after treatment completion.

Results: At the end of the study, the overall analysis showed a significant decrease in VAS and T-WOMAC scores in both the groups; a greater decrease in scores was found in the HILT group than in the control group (p < 0.001). The between-group comparison also showed a significant difference in VAS, but not in the T-WOMAC score, favouring HILT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The HILT plus conservative treatment can help alleviate pain in patients with knee OA. The findings of the present study could be used in clinical practice to add HILT as another noninvasive treatment option for knee OA. This could be advantageous, particularly for individuals who are at high risk of surgery due to multiple comorbidities or older people. Trial Registration. This clinical trial registration was performed at Clinical.gov (NCT04889885).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高强度激光治疗缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的短期疗效:一项单盲随机对照试验。
目的:本研究的目的是评估高强度激光治疗(HILT)对膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛减轻的疗效。方法:42例诊断为原发性膝关节OA, kelgren - lawrence分级为2-4的患者被纳入研究。患者随机分为两组:HILT组和对照组。干预组接受HILT治疗(能量密度22.39 J/cm2, 562.5焦耳/次),对照组接受假激光治疗,每周2-3次,共10次。两组患者都接受了同样的保守治疗。主要结果测量是视觉模拟量表(VAS)和改良的泰国版西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(T-WOMAC),分别在基线和治疗完成后立即进行评估。结果:研究结束时,总体分析显示,两组患者VAS评分和T-WOMAC评分均显著下降;与对照组相比,HILT组得分下降幅度更大(p < 0.001)。组间比较VAS评分差异有统计学意义,T-WOMAC评分差异无统计学意义,HILT评分更优(p < 0.05)。结论:HILT加保守治疗能有效减轻膝关节炎患者的疼痛。本研究的结果可用于临床实践,以增加HILT作为膝关节OA的另一种无创治疗选择。这可能是有利的,特别是对于那些由于多种合并症或老年人而处于手术高风险的个体。试验注册。该临床试验注册在clinical .gov (NCT04889885)进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain. Assessment of Clinical Analgesic Levels and Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Diclofenac and Methotrexate Combined Therapy with Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy. Potential S1 Nerve Root Blocks Associated with Sacroiliac Joint Injections. Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Pain Resilience Scale among Lebanese Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Exploring the Analgesic Initiation Mechanism of Tuina in the Dorsal Root Ganglion of Minor CCI Rats via the TRPV1/TRPA1-cGMP Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1