Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/5584106
Claudia Didyk, Belinda Lange, Lucy Kate Lewis
Aim: To explore the self-efficacy and self-management practises of people with low back pain (LBP), including associations between participant characteristics, self-efficacy and self-management. The secondary aim was to describe the characteristics of people with LBP who use smartphone apps for self-management, including app preferences.
Methods: Prospective cross-sectional online survey of Australian adults with current or previous LBP. Descriptive statistics were completed for all variables. Associations between participant characteristics, self-efficacy and self-management were explored through linear regression. Alpha was 0.05.
Results: A total of 136 survey responses were included (55.5 ± 14.5 years, 74% female). Most participants (93%) had LBP at the time of the survey and reported constant or daily (58%) pain of moderate severity. Nearly all participants managed their LBP on their own (91%), with the most frequently used self-management options including exercise (47%), advice from health professionals (38%) and pharmacological management (37%). Most self-managed either moderately (35%) or fairly (32%) well, with a mean self-management score of 11.9 ± 4.0 out of 20 and a mean self-efficacy score of 3.6 (±0.8), well above mid-range of 2.5. Lower socioeconomic status and higher scores in personality traits were associated with higher self-efficacy (p < 0.05). Longer duration and increased recurrence of LBP were associated with lower self-efficacy (p < 0.05). Participants with higher self-management scores were female, older, with higher scores in personality traits aside from agreeableness and lower severity of LBP (p < 0.05). Seventeen participants (13%) used apps.
Conclusion: Most adults with LBP self-managed well and had above-average self-efficacy. Smartphone app use was limited, with lack of knowledge a perceived barrier (59%, n = 73).
{"title":"Self-Efficacy, Self-Management and Use of Smartphone Apps for Low-Back Pain.","authors":"Claudia Didyk, Belinda Lange, Lucy Kate Lewis","doi":"10.1155/prm/5584106","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/5584106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the self-efficacy and self-management practises of people with low back pain (LBP), including associations between participant characteristics, self-efficacy and self-management. The secondary aim was to describe the characteristics of people with LBP who use smartphone apps for self-management, including app preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional online survey of Australian adults with current or previous LBP. Descriptive statistics were completed for all variables. Associations between participant characteristics, self-efficacy and self-management were explored through linear regression. Alpha was 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 survey responses were included (55.5 ± 14.5 years, 74% female). Most participants (93%) had LBP at the time of the survey and reported constant or daily (58%) pain of moderate severity. Nearly all participants managed their LBP on their own (91%), with the most frequently used self-management options including exercise (47%), advice from health professionals (38%) and pharmacological management (37%). Most self-managed either moderately (35%) or fairly (32%) well, with a mean self-management score of 11.9 ± 4.0 out of 20 and a mean self-efficacy score of 3.6 (±0.8), well above mid-range of 2.5. Lower socioeconomic status and higher scores in personality traits were associated with higher self-efficacy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Longer duration and increased recurrence of LBP were associated with lower self-efficacy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Participants with higher self-management scores were female, older, with higher scores in personality traits aside from agreeableness and lower severity of LBP (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Seventeen participants (13%) used apps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most adults with LBP self-managed well and had above-average self-efficacy. Smartphone app use was limited, with lack of knowledge a perceived barrier (59%, <i>n</i> = 73).</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5584106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698255/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Frailty represents a geriatric syndrome characterized by diminished physiological reserves and increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. While chronic diseases are established frailty risk factors, the relationship between migraine-a prevalent neurological condition affecting millions globally-and frailty development remains unexplored, representing a critical knowledge gap in geriatric neurology.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using baseline data (2011-2015) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationally representative cohort. Frailty was assessed using a validated 32-item Frailty Index based on deficit accumulation theory. Multivariable logistic regression models examined migraine-frailty associations, with sequential adjustment for sociodemographic factors, lifestyle behaviors, and comorbid conditions. Subgroup analyses evaluated effect modification across key demographic and clinical variables.
Results: Among 13,798 participants (mean age 57.6 ± 9.1 years; 49.6% female), 598 (4.3%) reported migraine and 1,315 (9.5%) met frailty criteria. Migraine participants demonstrated a 4.5-fold higher frailty prevalence (37.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) and significantly elevated median frailty scores (20.0 vs. 7.8, p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis revealed a robust independent association (OR = 5.61, 95% CI: 4.51-6.99, p < 0.001). Smoking status significantly modified this relationship (P-interaction = 0.025), with the strongest associations in ever-smokers (OR = 8.78, 95% CI: 4.36-17.69) and current smokers (OR = 7.30, 95% CI: 4.87-10.96).
Conclusion: This study establishes migraine as a novel independent risk factor for frailty in Chinese middle-aged and older adults. The pronounced smoking interaction suggests targeted tobacco cessation interventions may benefit frailty prevention in migraine patients.
{"title":"Association Between Migraine and Frailty Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on CHARLS.","authors":"Shuoyu Rui, Zhilong Cai, Jingjing Wu, Jing Zhou, Fuying Liu, Nanqu Huang, Yong Luo, Fei Feng","doi":"10.1155/prm/8392878","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/8392878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty represents a geriatric syndrome characterized by diminished physiological reserves and increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. While chronic diseases are established frailty risk factors, the relationship between migraine-a prevalent neurological condition affecting millions globally-and frailty development remains unexplored, representing a critical knowledge gap in geriatric neurology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using baseline data (2011-2015) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationally representative cohort. Frailty was assessed using a validated 32-item Frailty Index based on deficit accumulation theory. Multivariable logistic regression models examined migraine-frailty associations, with sequential adjustment for sociodemographic factors, lifestyle behaviors, and comorbid conditions. Subgroup analyses evaluated effect modification across key demographic and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,798 participants (mean age 57.6 ± 9.1 years; 49.6% female), 598 (4.3%) reported migraine and 1,315 (9.5%) met frailty criteria. Migraine participants demonstrated a 4.5-fold higher frailty prevalence (37.0% vs. 8.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and significantly elevated median frailty scores (20.0 vs. 7.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A multivariable analysis revealed a robust independent association (OR = 5.61, 95% CI: 4.51-6.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Smoking status significantly modified this relationship (P-interaction = 0.025), with the strongest associations in ever-smokers (OR = 8.78, 95% CI: 4.36-17.69) and current smokers (OR = 7.30, 95% CI: 4.87-10.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study establishes migraine as a novel independent risk factor for frailty in Chinese middle-aged and older adults. The pronounced smoking interaction suggests targeted tobacco cessation interventions may benefit frailty prevention in migraine patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8392878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145715316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge in surgical services, which necessitates improving analgesic strategies to enhance patient outcomes. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), which was primarily approved for the treatment of strabismus and blepharospasm, has demonstrated a promising impact on pain reduction through mechanisms such as neurotransmitter inhibition, receptor modulation, glial activity suppression, and interactions with opioidergic and GABAergic systems. A number of studies have investigated BoNT's impact on postsurgical pain. However, there is a lack of evaluation of its efficacy, safety, and optimal administration protocols across different surgical settings. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on the efficacy and complications of intra- and postoperative BoNT injections in managing postsurgical pain across various surgical procedures, including orthopedic and head and neck surgeries, mastectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, and fissurectomy.
{"title":"Intra- and Postoperative Botulinum Toxin Injection in Postsurgical Pain Management: A Literature Review.","authors":"Sogol Alikarami, Saereh Hosseindoost, Ahmad Reza Dehpour, Zahra Rezaei, Hossein Majedi","doi":"10.1155/prm/6649252","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/6649252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge in surgical services, which necessitates improving analgesic strategies to enhance patient outcomes. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), which was primarily approved for the treatment of strabismus and blepharospasm, has demonstrated a promising impact on pain reduction through mechanisms such as neurotransmitter inhibition, receptor modulation, glial activity suppression, and interactions with opioidergic and GABAergic systems. A number of studies have investigated BoNT's impact on postsurgical pain. However, there is a lack of evaluation of its efficacy, safety, and optimal administration protocols across different surgical settings. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on the efficacy and complications of intra- and postoperative BoNT injections in managing postsurgical pain across various surgical procedures, including orthopedic and head and neck surgeries, mastectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, and fissurectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6649252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12682448/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145709033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/8810256
Emilie Aarestrup Larsen, Johan Hviid Andersen, David Høyrup Christiansen, Trine Nøhr Winding
Background: Multisite musculoskeletal pain is a common condition among young adults, and identifying risk factors for the experience of pain is of particular interest. During the transition from adolescence to adulthood, individuals become less physically active. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term association between physical inactivity during adolescence and young adulthood and multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort later in young adulthood, with analyses conducted separately for males and females.
Methods: Data on self-reported levels of physical activity at Ages 15, 18, and 21 and multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort at Age 28 from The West Jutland Cohort Study (n = 1833) were used. The levels of physical activity were dichotomized into low level (< 4 h per week) and high level (> 4 h per week) of physical activity. Logistic regression analysis was conducted, stratified by sex and adjusted for depressive symptoms, smoking, parental and own educational level, equivalized childhood income, and pain status at Age 15. Results were presented as odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Results: The prevalence of multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort was 32%, and more females reported experiencing multisite pain (37%) than males (26%). The adjusted results showed that adolescents and young adults who were physically inactive were more likely to experience multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort later in life than those adolescents and young adults who were physically active (OR 1.9 (1.3-2.9)).
Conclusion: Physical inactivity during adolescence and young adulthood is a risk factor for experiencing multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort at Age 28. This emphasizes the importance of physical activity during adolescence and young adulthood for later physical health.
{"title":"How Does Physical Activity During Youth Affect the Development of Multisite Musculoskeletal Pain or Discomfort in Young Adults?","authors":"Emilie Aarestrup Larsen, Johan Hviid Andersen, David Høyrup Christiansen, Trine Nøhr Winding","doi":"10.1155/prm/8810256","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/8810256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multisite musculoskeletal pain is a common condition among young adults, and identifying risk factors for the experience of pain is of particular interest. During the transition from adolescence to adulthood, individuals become less physically active. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term association between physical inactivity during adolescence and young adulthood and multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort later in young adulthood, with analyses conducted separately for males and females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on self-reported levels of physical activity at Ages 15, 18, and 21 and multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort at Age 28 from The West Jutland Cohort Study (<i>n</i> = 1833) were used. The levels of physical activity were dichotomized into low level (< 4 h per week) and high level (> 4 h per week) of physical activity. Logistic regression analysis was conducted, stratified by sex and adjusted for depressive symptoms, smoking, parental and own educational level, equivalized childhood income, and pain status at Age 15. Results were presented as odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort was 32%, and more females reported experiencing multisite pain (37%) than males (26%). The adjusted results showed that adolescents and young adults who were physically inactive were more likely to experience multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort later in life than those adolescents and young adults who were physically active (OR 1.9 (1.3-2.9)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical inactivity during adolescence and young adulthood is a risk factor for experiencing multisite musculoskeletal pain or discomfort at Age 28. This emphasizes the importance of physical activity during adolescence and young adulthood for later physical health.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8810256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Pain is one of the most common and long-lasting symptoms after lung cancer surgery, potentially impairing physical functioning. This study aims to investigate to what extent pain mediates the association between the different surgical approaches (single-port VATS versus multiport VATS or thoracotomy) and postoperative functional recovery after lung cancer surgery, with the goal of establishing clinically actionable pain score thresholds.
Methods: In a prospective cohort study including 1381 patients, pain and functional status (activity limitation and walking difficulty) were assessed daily in hospital with the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery (PSA-Lung). The structural equation model (SEM) was used to investigate the mediation effect of pain in the surgery-pain-functioning pathway. The pain thresholds on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, and 3 for optimal functional recovery were identified, corresponding to the cutoff points of pain categorization that demonstrated the largest indirect effects in the models.
Results: The surgical approach had a significant indirect effect on activity limitation and walking difficulty through pain severity (p < 0.001), with a standardized effect value of 0.039 and 0.037, respectively. According to the largest mediation effects of pain categories generated from the each day SEM, the optimal pain score cutoffs are 5 on POD1, 4 on POD2, and 3 on POD3, for both activity limitation and walking difficulty.
Conclusion: Our study quantified the partial mediating effects of pain between surgical approaches and postoperative functional status in patients with lung cancer surgery. The mediation effect-based pain thresholds support precise strategies for postoperative functional rehabilitation, which is considered the major goal of enhanced recovery after surgery. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR2000033016.
{"title":"Establishing Pain Thresholds for Functional Recovery After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Mediation Analysis of the Surgery-Pain-Functioning Causal Pathway.","authors":"Pan Ma, Wei Dai, Shizhu Li, Rumei Xiang, Hongfan Yu, Xing Wei, Jia Liao, Cheng Lei, Wei Xu, Xiangxi Zhou, Zhibiao Wang, Qiuling Shi","doi":"10.1155/prm/3783225","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/3783225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pain is one of the most common and long-lasting symptoms after lung cancer surgery, potentially impairing physical functioning. This study aims to investigate to what extent pain mediates the association between the different surgical approaches (single-port VATS versus multiport VATS or thoracotomy) and postoperative functional recovery after lung cancer surgery, with the goal of establishing clinically actionable pain score thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study including 1381 patients, pain and functional status (activity limitation and walking difficulty) were assessed daily in hospital with the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery (PSA-Lung). The structural equation model (SEM) was used to investigate the mediation effect of pain in the surgery-pain-functioning pathway. The pain thresholds on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, and 3 for optimal functional recovery were identified, corresponding to the cutoff points of pain categorization that demonstrated the largest indirect effects in the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical approach had a significant indirect effect on activity limitation and walking difficulty through pain severity (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with a standardized effect value of 0.039 and 0.037, respectively. According to the largest mediation effects of pain categories generated from the each day SEM, the optimal pain score cutoffs are 5 on POD1, 4 on POD2, and 3 on POD3, for both activity limitation and walking difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study quantified the partial mediating effects of pain between surgical approaches and postoperative functional status in patients with lung cancer surgery. The mediation effect-based pain thresholds support precise strategies for postoperative functional rehabilitation, which is considered the major goal of enhanced recovery after surgery. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR2000033016.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3783225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-25eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/6996211
Elisha Doi, Cormac Ryan, Niki Jones, Chris Penlington, Jagjit Mankelow
Pain management apps are gaining popularity for providing timely, accessible care. However, digital health intervention research is still in its infancy, with a limited understanding of how users experience and make meaning of these tools. This study explores users' experiences with the Curable app, considering its impact and the influence of contextual factors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 Curable app users for chronic pain. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realist lens. Five themes were conceptualised: (1) The space between, participants navigate a paradoxical space where trust coexists with scepticism and desperation with hope in a delicate balance. (2) Tin Man and the Invisible Women, follows the participants' journeys towards the Curable app, navigating systemic biases and cultural norms. (3) It Takes a Village, highlights the 'village' of people, resources and modalities participants needed for effective pain care, beyond a solely biomedical approach. (4) Enjoy Being in the Process of Becoming, follows participants' interoceptive journey as they reconnect with the present moment, finding peace with their pain. (5) Fiend to Friend; a story of neuroplasticity, illustrates a shift in participants' fearful and combative relationship with pain towards a more conscious and compassionate companionship. The Curable app helped to fill gaps in existing care, illustrating the potential of digital tools when woven into broader ecosystems of support. However, as with all qualitative inquiry, these findings are situated and partial, reflecting the perspectives of well-educated, cisgender, English-speaking participants who chose to engage with this research.
疼痛管理应用程序因提供及时、便捷的护理而越来越受欢迎。然而,数字健康干预研究仍处于起步阶段,对用户如何体验和利用这些工具的理解有限。本研究探讨了Curable应用程序的用户体验,考虑了其影响和情境因素的影响。对12名可治愈的慢性疼痛应用程序用户进行了半结构化的在线访谈。通过批判现实主义的视角,运用反身性主题分析对文本进行分析。五个主题被概念化:(1)空间之间,参与者在一个矛盾的空间中导航,信任与怀疑共存,绝望与希望在微妙的平衡中共存。(2)《锡人与看不见的女人》(Tin Man and the Invisible Women),讲述了参与者走向可治愈应用程序的历程,克服了系统性偏见和文化规范。(3)它需要一个村庄,强调“村庄”的人,资源和模式参与者需要有效的疼痛护理,而不仅仅是生物医学的方法。(4)享受成为的过程,跟随参与者的内感受之旅,当他们重新连接到现在的时刻,在他们的痛苦中找到和平。(5)从朋友到朋友;一个关于神经可塑性的故事,说明了参与者对疼痛的恐惧和战斗关系向更有意识和更富有同情心的陪伴的转变。Curable应用程序帮助填补了现有护理的空白,说明了数字工具在融入更广泛的支持生态系统后的潜力。然而,与所有的定性调查一样,这些发现是定位的和局部的,反映了选择参与这项研究的受过良好教育的、顺性别的、说英语的参与者的观点。
{"title":"A Reflexive Thematic Analysis Exploring the Experiences of People Using the Curable App for Chronic Pain.","authors":"Elisha Doi, Cormac Ryan, Niki Jones, Chris Penlington, Jagjit Mankelow","doi":"10.1155/prm/6996211","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/6996211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain management apps are gaining popularity for providing timely, accessible care. However, digital health intervention research is still in its infancy, with a limited understanding of how users experience and make meaning of these tools. This study explores users' experiences with the Curable app, considering its impact and the influence of contextual factors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 Curable app users for chronic pain. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realist lens. Five themes were conceptualised: (1) <i>The space between</i>, participants navigate a paradoxical space where trust coexists with scepticism and desperation with hope in a delicate balance. (2) <i>Tin Man and the Invisible Women,</i> follows the participants' journeys towards the Curable app, navigating systemic biases and cultural norms. (3) <i>It Takes a Village</i>, highlights the 'village' of people, resources and modalities participants needed for effective pain care, beyond a solely biomedical approach. (4) <i>Enjoy Being in the Process of Becoming,</i> follows participants' interoceptive journey as they reconnect with the present moment, finding peace with their pain. (5) <i>Fiend to Friend</i>; <i>a story of neuroplasticity,</i> illustrates a shift in participants' fearful and combative relationship with pain towards a more conscious and compassionate companionship. The Curable app helped to fill gaps in existing care, illustrating the potential of digital tools when woven into broader ecosystems of support. However, as with all qualitative inquiry, these findings are situated and partial, reflecting the perspectives of well-educated, cisgender, English-speaking participants who chose to engage with this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6996211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12672080/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/8356050
Qiyao Li, Chenchang He, Rui Huang, Xiang Gao, Li Li, Pei Fan
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of mechanical pain in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (KOA), providing insights for targeted treatment approaches.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 920 patients with KOA. The sample size was determined using the formula n=(Z2∗P∗(1 - P))/E2, assuming a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a 5% margin of error. Data on demographics and affected knee parameters, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), affected side, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, range of motion, degree of varus, and numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected. Pain was categorized using the painDETECT questionnaire and WOMAC scores to differentiate between simple mechanical pain, mixed mechanical pain, and probable neuropathic pain (NP).
Results: Among participants, 43.48% experienced simple mechanical pain, 33.48% had mixed mechanical pain, and 23.04% reported probable NP. Significant differences were observed in the total WOMAC scores, range of motion (bend), and NRS across the three groups. Gender distribution varied significantly, with a higher proportion of female patients in each pain category. Notably, NRS on the affected side was moderately correlated with the total WOMAC pain score (r = 0.500, ∗p < 0.05). Moreover, female patients exhibited significantly higher WOMAC pain scores (6.28) compared with males (6.08), and women with a WOMAC pain score > 4 had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.462 (95% CI: 1.766-3.433, ∗p < 0.05) compared with those with a score ≤ 4.
Conclusions: Mechanical pain is highly prevalent in patients with advanced KOA. Identifying the specific type of mechanical pain and associated risk factors, such as female gender and higher NRS score, can facilitate personalized pain management.
{"title":"Mechanical Pain is a Main Type of Pain in Patients With Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Qiyao Li, Chenchang He, Rui Huang, Xiang Gao, Li Li, Pei Fan","doi":"10.1155/prm/8356050","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/8356050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of mechanical pain in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (KOA), providing insights for targeted treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 920 patients with KOA. The sample size was determined using the formula <i>n</i>=(<i>Z</i> <sup>2</sup>∗<i>P</i>∗(1 - <i>P</i>))/<i>E</i> <sup>2</sup>, assuming a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a 5% margin of error. Data on demographics and affected knee parameters, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), affected side, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, range of motion, degree of varus, and numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected. Pain was categorized using the painDETECT questionnaire and WOMAC scores to differentiate between simple mechanical pain, mixed mechanical pain, and probable neuropathic pain (NP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 43.48% experienced simple mechanical pain, 33.48% had mixed mechanical pain, and 23.04% reported probable NP. Significant differences were observed in the total WOMAC scores, range of motion (bend), and NRS across the three groups. Gender distribution varied significantly, with a higher proportion of female patients in each pain category. Notably, NRS on the affected side was moderately correlated with the total WOMAC pain score (<i>r</i> = 0.500, <sup>∗</sup> <i>p</i> < 0.05). Moreover, female patients exhibited significantly higher WOMAC pain scores (6.28) compared with males (6.08), and women with a WOMAC pain score > 4 had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.462 (95% CI: 1.766-3.433, <sup>∗</sup> <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared with those with a score ≤ 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mechanical pain is highly prevalent in patients with advanced KOA. Identifying the specific type of mechanical pain and associated risk factors, such as female gender and higher NRS score, can facilitate personalized pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8356050"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12668844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145661152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/6677904
Salwan Diwan, Alexander Olausson, Paulin Andréll, Axel Wolf, Pether Jildenstål
Objectives: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a promising alternative to traditional opioid-based anesthesia. Research indicates that OFA reduces postoperative opioid consumption and related adverse effects while maintaining effective pain control and patient safety. Despite these benefits, clinical adoption of OFA remains limited, possible due to gaps in evidence. To bridge this knowledge gap, a web-based survey was used to assess Swedish healthcare professionals' (HCPs') knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding OFA, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for its broader integration into routine anesthesia care.
Methods: A web-based survey was sent to anesthesiology department heads at all university hospitals in Sweden and three randomly selected smaller hospitals. The department heads distributed the survey to anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, critical care nurses, and registered nurses involved in intraoperative care. The questionnaire had four sections: demographic data, general questions regarding intraoperative care, specific questions on OFA usage, and an open-ended question.
Results: A total of 309 HCPs responded to the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 35%. The majority of respondents (77%) had seven or more years of perioperative experience, 63% were female, and 82% worked at university hospitals. Knowledge about OFA was generally low, with 62% reporting insufficient knowledge, and 14% actively applied OFA. Self-report data demonstrated that anesthesiologists had significantly lower knowledge levels on applying OFA compared to nurse anesthetists and critical care nurses (p < 0.01). However, 85% of all HCPs expressed interest in acquiring additional theoretical knowledge about OFA. Additionally, 87% reported either absent guidelines or uncertainty about their existence, while most (57%) agreed that guidelines supporting the practice of OFA should be introduced at their clinic.
Conclusion: This survey indicated interest in OFA among Swedish perioperative HCPs while revealing key barriers to implementation, including knowledge gaps and limited guidelines. Addressing these challenges through targeted education and institutional support may facilitate broader OFA adoption, enhancing patient safety and multimodal perioperative pain management.
{"title":"Opioid-Free Anesthesia in Perioperative Care: Findings From a Swedish Web-Based Survey.","authors":"Salwan Diwan, Alexander Olausson, Paulin Andréll, Axel Wolf, Pether Jildenstål","doi":"10.1155/prm/6677904","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/6677904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a promising alternative to traditional opioid-based anesthesia. Research indicates that OFA reduces postoperative opioid consumption and related adverse effects while maintaining effective pain control and patient safety. Despite these benefits, clinical adoption of OFA remains limited, possible due to gaps in evidence. To bridge this knowledge gap, a web-based survey was used to assess Swedish healthcare professionals' (HCPs') knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding OFA, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for its broader integration into routine anesthesia care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was sent to anesthesiology department heads at all university hospitals in Sweden and three randomly selected smaller hospitals. The department heads distributed the survey to anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, critical care nurses, and registered nurses involved in intraoperative care. The questionnaire had four sections: demographic data, general questions regarding intraoperative care, specific questions on OFA usage, and an open-ended question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 309 HCPs responded to the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 35%. The majority of respondents (77%) had seven or more years of perioperative experience, 63% were female, and 82% worked at university hospitals. Knowledge about OFA was generally low, with 62% reporting insufficient knowledge, and 14% actively applied OFA. Self-report data demonstrated that anesthesiologists had significantly lower knowledge levels on applying OFA compared to nurse anesthetists and critical care nurses (<i>p</i> < 0.01). However, 85% of all HCPs expressed interest in acquiring additional theoretical knowledge about OFA. Additionally, 87% reported either absent guidelines or uncertainty about their existence, while most (57%) agreed that guidelines supporting the practice of OFA should be introduced at their clinic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey indicated interest in OFA among Swedish perioperative HCPs while revealing key barriers to implementation, including knowledge gaps and limited guidelines. Addressing these challenges through targeted education and institutional support may facilitate broader OFA adoption, enhancing patient safety and multimodal perioperative pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6677904"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660620/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/6147802
Suzana Bojic, Nemanja Radovanovic, Milica Radovic, Maja Stojanovic, Marija Stevic, Marko Djuric, Nemanja Dimic, Dusica Stamenkovic
Introduction: Exercise-induced pain (EIP) is a transient pain phenomenon that emerges during physical exertion and resolves soon after exercise cessation. Despite being recognized as a performance-limiting variable in endurance sports, the mechanisms driving its interindividual variability remain poorly defined. We aimed to determine whether sex remains a significant predictor of EIP intensity after adjustment for performance and pain sensitivity.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 122 recreational athletes (61 males and 61 females), including 48 trail runners and 74 hikers. Participants provided self-reported data on demographics and training habits. Performance was evaluated using both external and internal load metrics: external load was represented by activity duration and effort-adjusted speed, while internal load was assessed using the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Maximum and average EIP was rated on a numeric rating scale and combined into a pain composite score (PCS). Pain threshold and tolerance were measured using the cold pressor test. Associations between variables and pain outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear models.
Results: No significant differences were observed in maximum or average EIP intensity, pain threshold, or pain tolerance between male and female athletes. Sex was not a significant predictor of the PCS after adjusting for external and internal exercise load. Neither pain threshold nor tolerance significantly predicted PCS, and these associations did not vary by gender.
Conclusion: In recreational endurance athletes, sex had no significant impact on EIP intensity when accounting for performance and pain sensitivity. These findings challenged traditional assumptions about sex-related pain differences.
{"title":"Sex Is Not an Independent Predictor of Exercise-Induced Pain After Adjustment for Performance and Pain Sensitivity.","authors":"Suzana Bojic, Nemanja Radovanovic, Milica Radovic, Maja Stojanovic, Marija Stevic, Marko Djuric, Nemanja Dimic, Dusica Stamenkovic","doi":"10.1155/prm/6147802","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/6147802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise-induced pain (EIP) is a transient pain phenomenon that emerges during physical exertion and resolves soon after exercise cessation. Despite being recognized as a performance-limiting variable in endurance sports, the mechanisms driving its interindividual variability remain poorly defined. We aimed to determine whether sex remains a significant predictor of EIP intensity after adjustment for performance and pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 122 recreational athletes (61 males and 61 females), including 48 trail runners and 74 hikers. Participants provided self-reported data on demographics and training habits. Performance was evaluated using both external and internal load metrics: external load was represented by activity duration and effort-adjusted speed, while internal load was assessed using the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Maximum and average EIP was rated on a numeric rating scale and combined into a pain composite score (PCS). Pain threshold and tolerance were measured using the cold pressor test. Associations between variables and pain outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in maximum or average EIP intensity, pain threshold, or pain tolerance between male and female athletes. Sex was not a significant predictor of the PCS after adjusting for external and internal exercise load. Neither pain threshold nor tolerance significantly predicted PCS, and these associations did not vary by gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In recreational endurance athletes, sex had no significant impact on EIP intensity when accounting for performance and pain sensitivity. These findings challenged traditional assumptions about sex-related pain differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6147802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12643693/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145605461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1155/prm/7548771
Joshua W Pate, Laura E Simons, Emily Moore, Jennifer Norton, Erin Turbitt, Arianne Verhagen, Verity Pacey
Objectives: To assess perceived changes in children's understanding of the pain-damage relationship and the brain's influence on pain following exposure to sham and pain science education (PSE) books.
Methods: A series of single-case experimental designs were replicated across 17 children (8-12 years), with and without chronic pain, over six weeks. Following baseline, participants received a sham book and then a PSE book. The Concept of Pain Inventory (COPI) (total and selected items) and qualitative interviews (child and interviewer) assessed conceptual change and book acceptability.
Results: COPI scores for three targeted items fluctuated but generally increased after the PSE book for both groups, suggesting improved understanding. Discrepancies between COPI responses and interview data occurred in 88% of children, indicating varied perspectives on the nature and extent of conceptual change. The PSE book was found to be acceptable and was preferred by most children.
Discussion: Children's understanding of core pain science concepts can improve with targeted, book-based PSE. The dynamic nature of conceptual change and observed discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative assessment methods underscore the value of using multiple approaches to evaluate learning in pediatric PSE.
{"title":"Targeting Pain Science Education With a Children's Book: A Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) Study With a Sham Comparison.","authors":"Joshua W Pate, Laura E Simons, Emily Moore, Jennifer Norton, Erin Turbitt, Arianne Verhagen, Verity Pacey","doi":"10.1155/prm/7548771","DOIUrl":"10.1155/prm/7548771","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess perceived changes in children's understanding of the pain-damage relationship and the brain's influence on pain following exposure to sham and pain science education (PSE) books.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of single-case experimental designs were replicated across 17 children (8-12 years), with and without chronic pain, over six weeks. Following baseline, participants received a sham book and then a PSE book. The Concept of Pain Inventory (COPI) (total and selected items) and qualitative interviews (child and interviewer) assessed conceptual change and book acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COPI scores for three targeted items fluctuated but generally increased after the PSE book for both groups, suggesting improved understanding. Discrepancies between COPI responses and interview data occurred in 88% of children, indicating varied perspectives on the nature and extent of conceptual change. The PSE book was found to be acceptable and was preferred by most children.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Children's understanding of core pain science concepts can improve with targeted, book-based PSE. The dynamic nature of conceptual change and observed discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative assessment methods underscore the value of using multiple approaches to evaluate learning in pediatric PSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7548771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12611469/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}